IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0294806.html

Protocol for a cluster randomized study to compare the effectiveness of a self-report distress tool and a mental health referral service to usual case management on program completion among vulnerable youth enrolled in a vocational training program

Author

Listed:
  • Shawna Bailey
  • Carrie Stoner
  • Kelly Cruise
  • Giulio DiDiodato

Abstract

Objectives: 1) To compare the effect of the self-report distress tool (DT) and rapid mental health referral process (MH) on vocational training program attendance. Design: Pragmatic, multi-centre, 2x2 factorial, cluster randomized, superiority study with 4 parallel groups and primary endpoints of vocational program attendance and completion at 12 weeks and post-program employment at 24 months. Cluster randomization of each training cohort will be performed with a 1:1:1:1 allocation ratio using a site stratified, permuted-block group schema. Final sample size is expected to be 400 participants (100 per group). Participants: Students enrolled in Community Builder’s Trades & Diversity Training Program in either the city of Barrie or Sudbury (in Ontario, Canada) will be eligible for enrollment if they have an active Ontario Health Insurance Plan number and Canadian Social Insurance Number and provide written informed consent prior to Training program commencement. Outcomes: The primary outcome includes: Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05626374 (November 23, 2022).

Suggested Citation

  • Shawna Bailey & Carrie Stoner & Kelly Cruise & Giulio DiDiodato, 2024. "Protocol for a cluster randomized study to compare the effectiveness of a self-report distress tool and a mental health referral service to usual case management on program completion among vulnerable youth enrolled in a vocational training program," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(8), pages 1-16, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0294806
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294806
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0294806
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0294806&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0294806?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Card & Jochen Kluve & Andrea Weber, 2018. "What Works? A Meta Analysis of Recent Active Labor Market Program Evaluations," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 16(3), pages 894-931.
    2. Donner, A. & Klar, N., 2004. "Pitfalls of and Controversies in Cluster Randomization Trials," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 94(3), pages 416-422.
    3. Cédric Brun & Steeves Demazeux & Pierangelo Di Vittorio & François Gonon & Philippe Gorry & Jan Peter Konsman & Fanny Lung & Yannick Lung & Michel Minard & Matthieu Montalban & Nicole Rumeau & Andy Sm, 2015. "Construction of mental health categories [La construction des catégories diagnostiques de maladie mentale]," Post-Print hal-02195583, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Collewet, Marion & Fairley, Kim & Kessels, Roselinde & Knoef, Marike & van Vliet, Olaf, 2024. "The design of welfare: unraveling taxpayers' preferences," OSF Preprints 4am7e, Center for Open Science.
    2. Kim, Jinyoung & Kim, Seonghoon & Koh, Kanghyock, 2022. "Labor market institutions and the incidence of payroll taxation," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    3. Matthias Collischon & Kamila Cygan-Rehm & Regina T. Riphahn, 2021. "Employment effects of payroll tax subsidies," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 1201-1219, October.
    4. Anna Sokolova, 2023. "Marginal Propensity to Consume and Unemployment: a Meta-analysis," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 51, pages 813-846, December.
    5. Fabrice Gilles & Yannick L'Horty & Ferhat Mihoubi, 2021. "The Effects of the Non-Financial Component of Business Accelerators," TEPP Working Paper 2021-06, TEPP.
    6. Oriana Bandiera & Ahmed Elsayed & Anton Heil & Andrea Smurra, 2022. "Economic Development and the Organisation Of Labour: Evidence from the Jobs of the World Project," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 20(6), pages 2226-2270.
    7. World Bank, 2019. "Growth and Jobs in Slavonia, Baranja, and Srijem," World Bank Publications - Reports 34182, The World Bank Group.
    8. Marco Caliendo & Robert Mahlstedt & Gerard J. van den Berg & Johan Vikström, 2023. "Side effects of labor market policies," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 125(2), pages 339-375, April.
    9. Banerjee, Abhijit V. & Chiplunkar, Gaurav, 2024. "How important are matching frictions in the labor market? Experimental & non-experimental evidence from a large Indian firm," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    10. Kenneth Fortson & Dana Rotz & Paul Burkander & Annalisa Mastri & Peter Schochet & Linda Rosenberg & Sheena McConnell & Ronald D'Amico, "undated". "Providing Public Workforce Services to Job Seekers: 30-Month Impact Findings on the WIA Adult and Dislocated Worker Programs," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 42e8b3550e40408f854b966d0, Mathematica Policy Research.
    11. Pardesi, Mantej, 2024. "Productivity convergence and firm’s training strategy," ROA Research Memorandum 003, Maastricht University, Research Centre for Education and the Labour Market (ROA).
    12. Bruno Crépon & Gerard J. van den Berg, 2016. "Active Labor Market Policies," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 8(1), pages 521-546, October.
    13. Silke Anger & Bernhard Christoph & Agata Galkiewicz & Shushanik Margaryan & Malte Sandner & Thomas Siedler, 2025. "Online Tutoring, School Performance, and School-to-Work Transitions: Evidence from a Randomized Controlled Trial," Berlin School of Economics Discussion Papers 0084, Berlin School of Economics.
    14. Canzian, Giulia & Meroni, Elena Claudia & Santangelo, Giulia, 2023. "Evaluation of a Flemish Active Labour Market Policy in the framework of the European Social Fund. Results and challenges," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    15. Szabó, Lajos Tamás, 2022. "A közfoglalkoztatottak jellemzői [The characteristics of public workers]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(10), pages 1114-1156.
    16. Taina Leinonen & Svetlana Solovieva & Kirsti Husgafvel-Pursiainen & Mikko Laaksonen & Eira Viikari-Juntura, 2019. "Do individual and work-related factors differentiate work participation trajectories before and after vocational rehabilitation?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-19, February.
    17. Eichhorst, Werner & Rinne, Ulf, 2016. "Promoting Youth Employment in Europe: Evidence-based Policy Lessons," IZA Policy Papers 119, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    18. Anna Aizer & Shari Eli & Adriana Lleras-Muney & Keyoung Lee, 2020. "Do Youth Employment Programs Work? Evidence from the New Deal," NBER Working Papers 27103, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Fusaro, Stefano & Scandurra, Rosario, 2023. "The impact of the European social fund on youth education and employment," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    20. Da Mata, Daniel & Oliveira, Rodrigo & Silva, Diana, 2025. "Who benefits from job training programs? Evidence from a high-dosage program in Brazil," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0294806. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.