IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0291351.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

R&D mode and coordination of green products in sustainable supply chain considering power structures

Author

Listed:
  • Tong Liu
  • Qinghua Feng

Abstract

Green product R&D has a significant impact on the sustainable development of the economy and environment, and green product R&D can be carried out by manufacturers, retailers, third-party companies, and enterprise alliances. The decision-making order in the supply chain depends on the power structures, which can affect the choice of the supply chain decision-making. To study the optimal choice of green product R&D mode in different power structures and the influence of power structure on product price, market demand, green level, and enterprise profits, This paper compares five modes including green product R&D by manufacturers, green product R&D by retailers, green product R&D outsourced by manufacturers to third-party companies, green product R&D outsourced by retailers to third-party companies and green product R&D by manufacturers and retailers in the three power structures of manufacturers as core enterprises, retailers as core enterprises, and equal power between manufacturers and retailers to study the selection strategy of green product R&D modes in the sustainable supply chain. The conclusion provides a strategic reference for the selection of green product R&D mode in different power structures. The findings indicate that when manufacturers are core enterprises, retailers’ green product R&D is better than that of manufacturers. When retailers are core enterprises, manufacturers’ green product R&D is better than that of retailers. In the same power structure, manufacturers’ green product R&D is better than outsourcing to third-party companies, retailers’ green product R&D is better than outsourcing to third-party companies, and manufacturers and retailers jointly conduct green product R&D better than manufacturers or retailers alone. When manufacturers and retailers have equal power, the market demand and the product green level are the highest, and the retail price is the lowest. When manufacturers are core enterprises, manufacturers’ profits are the highest. When retailers are core enterprises, retailers’ profits are the highest. Finally, a two-part pricing contract is used to coordinate the optimal selection strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Tong Liu & Qinghua Feng, 2023. "R&D mode and coordination of green products in sustainable supply chain considering power structures," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(11), pages 1-35, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0291351
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291351
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0291351
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0291351&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0291351?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Syed Abdul Rehman Khan & Muhammad Waqas & Xue Honggang & Naveed Ahmad & Zhang Yu, 2022. "Adoption of innovative strategies to mitigate supply chain disruption: COVID-19 pandemic," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 1115-1133, December.
    2. Lai, Kee-hung & Feng, Yunting & Zhu, Qinghua, 2023. "Digital transformation for green supply chain innovation in manufacturing operations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    3. Zhang, Lina & Zhang, Yumeng & Chutani, Anshuman, 2022. "Riding the wave of fashion rental: The role of power structures and green advertising," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    4. Mingjun Jiang & Dongyan Chen & Hui Yu, 2021. "Research on Reward and Punishment Contract Model and Coordination of Green Supply Chain Based on Fairness Preference," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    5. Agi, Maher A.N. & Yan, Xinghao, 2020. "Greening products in a supply chain under market segmentation and different channel power structures," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    6. Yong Liu & Wenwen Ren & Qian Xu & Zhi-yang Liu, 2022. "Decision analysis of supply chains considering corporate social responsibility and government subsidy under different channel power structures," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(2), pages 1841-1869, August.
    7. Ehsan Shekarian & Behrang Ijadi & Amirreza Zare & Jukka Majava, 2022. "Sustainable Supply Chain Management: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Industrial Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-30, June.
    8. Gu, Haoran & Yang, Shenggang & Xu, Zhaoyi & Cheng, Cheng, 2023. "Supply chain finance, green innovation, and productivity: Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    9. Qinghua Feng & Tong Liu, 2022. "Selection Strategy and Coordination of Green Product R&D in Sustainable Competitive Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-22, July.
    10. Kelei Xue & Guohua Sun & Yuyan Wang & Shuiye Niu, 2021. "Optimal Pricing and Green Product Design Strategies in a Sustainable Supply Chain Considering Government Subsidy and Different Channel Power Structures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-26, November.
    11. Lin, Boqiang & Xie, Yongjing, 2023. "Positive or negative? R&D subsidies and green technology innovation: Evidence from China's renewable energy industry," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 148-156.
    12. Wang, Liukai & Li, Min & Wang, Weiqing & Gong, Yu & Xiong, Yu, 2023. "Green innovation output in the supply chain network with environmental information disclosure: An empirical analysis of Chinese listed firms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    13. Xiaojing Liu & Wenyi Du & Yijie Sun, 2020. "Green Supply Chain Decisions Under Different Power Structures: Wholesale Price vs. Revenue Sharing Contract," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-18, October.
    14. Maher Agi & Xinghao Yan, 2020. "Greening products in a supply chain under market segmentation and different channel power structures," Post-Print hal-02898158, HAL.
    15. Xing, Yijun & Liu, Yipeng, 2023. "Integrating product-service innovation into green supply chain management from a life cycle perspective: A systematic review and future research directions," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    16. Li, Zhimin & Pan, Yanchun & Yang, Wen & Ma, Jianhua & Zhou, Ming, 2021. "Effects of government subsidies on green technology investment and green marketing coordination of supply chain under the cap-and-trade mechanism," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    17. Shan Chang & Bin Hu & Xiuhong He, 2019. "Supply Chain Coordination in the Context of Green Marketing Efforts and Capacity Expansion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-22, October.
    18. Li, Qingying & Ma, Manqiong & Shi, Tianqin & Zhu, Chen, 2022. "Green investment in a sustainable supply chain: The role of blockchain and fairness," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    19. Liu, Yang & Zhu, Qinghua & Seuring, Stefan, 2017. "Linking capabilities to green operations strategies: The moderating role of corporate environmental proactivity," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 182-195.
    20. Kumar, Maneesh & Rodrigues, Vasco Sanchez, 2020. "Synergetic effect of lean and green on innovation: A resource-based perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 469-479.
    21. Chang Su & Xiaojing Liu & Wenyi Du, 2020. "Green Supply Chain Decisions Considering Consumers’ Low-Carbon Awareness under Different Government Subsidies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-12, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lai, Zhixuan & Lou, Gaoxiang & Ma, Haicheng & Chung, Sai-Ho & Wen, Xin & Fan, Tijun, 2022. "Optimal green supply chain financing strategy: Internal collaborative financing and external investments," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    2. Lee, Sangjoon & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing & Yoo, Seung Ho, 2024. "Multi-period quality and pricing decision in production-focused and market-focused supply chains: How to manage a long-term contractual relationship," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    3. Xia, Jing & Niu, Wenju, 2021. "Carbon-reducing contract design for a supply chain with environmental responsibility under asymmetric information," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    4. Li, Guo & Xue, Jing & Li, Na & Qi, Qingwu, 2024. "Does digital finance favor firms in supply chains? Roles of green innovation and bargaining power," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    5. Wang, Kai & Zeng, Hao & Yuan, Yue & Zhang, Chong & Liu, Lu, 2022. "Green or non-green: A game to introduce decision making under fairness concerns," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    6. Guohu Qi & Xuemei Zhang & Jiawei Hu & Haoran Chen, 2022. "Decision and Coordination of an O2O Supply Chain With Market Segmentation and Showrooming Effect," International Journal of Information Systems and Supply Chain Management (IJISSCM), IGI Global, vol. 15(1), pages 1-42, January.
    7. Lixi Zhou & Tijun Fan & Jie Yang & Lihao Zhang, 2022. "Monopolistic vs. Competitive Supply Chain Concerning Selection of the Platform Selling Mode in Three Power Structures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-27, September.
    8. Wen Jiang & Menglin Liu & Lu Gan & Chong Wang, 2021. "Optimal Pricing, Ordering, and Coordination for Prefabricated Building Supply Chain with Power Structure and Flexible Cap-and-Trade," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(19), pages 1-22, September.
    9. Nouira, Imen & Hammami, Ramzi & Fernandez Arias, Alina & Gondran, Natacha & Frein, Yannick, 2022. "Olive oil supply chain design with organic and conventional market segments and consumers’ preference to local products," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    10. Nan Xu & Yaoqun Xu & Haiyan Zhong, 2023. "Pricing Decisions for Power Battery Closed-Loop Supply Chains with Low-Carbon Input by Echelon Utilization Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-30, December.
    11. Hagspiel, Verena & Kort, Peter M. & Nunes, Cláudia & Pimentel, Rita & Støre, Kristian, 2021. "Capacity optimization of an innovating firm," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    12. Kelei Xue & Guohua Sun & Yuyan Wang & Shuiye Niu, 2021. "Optimal Pricing and Green Product Design Strategies in a Sustainable Supply Chain Considering Government Subsidy and Different Channel Power Structures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-26, November.
    13. Cai, Jianhu & Sun, Haining & Shang, Jennifer & Hegde, Gajanan G., 2023. "Information structure selection in a green supply chain: Impacts of wholesale price and greenness level," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(1), pages 34-46.
    14. Ma, Xueli & Mao, Jinyue & Luo, Qian & Bai, Qingguo, 2024. "Effects of information superiority and green optimism on green supply chains under different power structures," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    15. Zhou, Yu & Yan, Shuangqi & Li, Gendao & Xiong, Yu & Lin, Zhibin, 2023. "The impact of consumer skepticism on blockchain-enabled sustainability disclosure in a supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    16. Liu, Yaobin & Hu, Sheng & Wang, Chenchen, 2024. "The green innovation spillover effect of enterprise digital transformation: Based on supply chain perspective," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 1381-1393.
    17. Hanli Hu & Yu Cao & Dan Yi & Qingsong Li, 2023. "How to Distribute Green Products in Competition with Brown Products? Direct Selling versus Agent Selling?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-22, July.
    18. Nguyen Thuy Trang & Steven W. Kopp & Vo Hong Tu, 2025. "Sustainable development of local livelihoods in Vietnam: A demand‐driven approach through “One Commune, One Product”," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(1), pages 270-286, February.
    19. Xia, Qiu & Zhi, Bangdong & Wang, Xiaojun, 2021. "The role of cross-shareholding in the green supply chain: Green contribution, power structure and coordination," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    20. Junbin Wang & Xuan Gao & Zhiguo Wang, 2021. "Sustainable Supply Chain Decisions under E-Commerce Platform Marketplace with Competition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-23, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0291351. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.