IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i16p8749-d608923.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on Reward and Punishment Contract Model and Coordination of Green Supply Chain Based on Fairness Preference

Author

Listed:
  • Mingjun Jiang

    (School of Economics and Management, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin 150080, China
    School of Economics, Heilongjiang University of Science and Technology, Harbin 150022, China)

  • Dongyan Chen

    (College of Science, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin 150080, China)

  • Hui Yu

    (College of Science, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin 150080, China)

Abstract

With the increasing demand for “green” goods, it is necessary for companies to develop green innovation to seize market opportunities. Companies often use the model of supply chain cooperation to carry out green innovation. The standard reward and punishment contract model is constructed based on the green degree of the product provided by the supplier when the manufacturer has a fair preference. The impact of the manufacturer’s fairness preference on the green degree of the product, price, manufacturer’s profit, supplier’s profit, and overall profit when the product green degree standard provided by the supplier is greater or smaller than the manufacturer’s demand standard is analyzed. The impact of the difference in channel power between manufacturers and suppliers is also analyzed on the overall profit of the green supply chain. The research results showed that when the manufacturer’s attention to fairness is equal to the attention to self-interest, the overall profit of the green supply chain is the largest, the coordination of the supply chain can be achieved, and the difference in the channel power of the participants in the green supply chain has a significant impact on the overall profit, which is verified by numerical analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Mingjun Jiang & Dongyan Chen & Hui Yu, 2021. "Research on Reward and Punishment Contract Model and Coordination of Green Supply Chain Based on Fairness Preference," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:8749-:d:608923
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/8749/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/8749/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lisa Melander, 2018. "Customer and Supplier Collaboration in Green Product Innovation: External and Internal Capabilities," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(6), pages 677-693, September.
    2. Md. Ahashan Habib & Yukun Bao & Nurun Nabi & Marzia Dulal & Asma Ansary Asha & Mazedul Islam, 2021. "Impact of Strategic Orientations on the Implementation of Green Supply Chain Management Practices and Sustainable Firm Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, January.
    3. Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky, 2013. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 6, pages 99-127, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    4. Jafar Heydari & Kannan Govindan & Zahra Basiri, 2021. "Balancing price and green quality in presence of consumer environmental awareness: a green supply chain coordination approach," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(7), pages 1957-1975, April.
    5. Biswajit Sarkar & Sharmila Saren & Mitali Sarkar & Yong Won Seo, 2016. "A Stackelberg Game Approach in an Integrated Inventory Model with Carbon-Emission and Setup Cost Reduction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-23, December.
    6. Chu, Junfei & Wu, Jie & Chu, Chengbin & Zhang, Tinglong, 2020. "DEA-based fixed cost allocation in two-stage systems: Leader-follower and satisfaction degree bargaining game approaches," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    7. Gary E Bolton & Axel Ockenfels, 1997. "A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition," Levine's Working Paper Archive 1889, David K. Levine.
    8. Wei Wang & Xiujuan Liu & Wensi Zhang & Ge Gao & Hui Zhang, 2019. "Coordination of a Green Supply Chain with One Manufacturer and Two Competing Retailers under Different Power Structures," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-18, December.
    9. Chiou, Tzu-Yun & Chan, Hing Kai & Lettice, Fiona & Chung, Sai Ho, 2011. "The influence of greening the suppliers and green innovation on environmental performance and competitive advantage in Taiwan," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(6), pages 822-836.
    10. Fei Ye & Lixu Li & Zhiqiang Wang & Yina Li, 2018. "An Asymmetric Nash Bargaining Model for Carbon Emission Quota Allocation among Industries: Evidence from Guangdong Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-18, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chin, Tachia & Shi, Yi & Singh, Sanjay Kumar & Agbanyo, George Kwame & Ferraris, Alberto, 2022. "Leveraging blockchain technology for green innovation in ecosystem-based business models: A dynamic capability of values appropriation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yumin Fu & Jianyun Wu & Cheng Ma & Xiaoyu Fu, 2023. "Agency, Reselling, or Hybrid: Strategic Channel Selection in a Green Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.
    2. Yu Zhang & Yajuan Wang, 2022. "Do Managerial Ties Help or Hinder Corporate Green Innovation? The Moderating Roles of Contextual Factors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Jingjing Zuo & Baoyin Qiu, 2023. "The impact of local gambling preferences on firm‐level environmental violations: Evidence from China," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(2), pages 1175-1190, March.
    4. Wentao Yi & Zhongwei Feng & Chunqiao Tan & Yuzhong Yang, 2021. "Green Supply Chain Management with Nash Bargaining Loss-Averse Reference Dependence," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(24), pages 1-26, December.
    5. Allal-Chérif, Oihab & Costa Climent, Juan & Ulrich Berenguer, Klaus Jurgen, 2023. "Born to be sustainable: How to combine strategic disruption, open innovation, and process digitization to create a sustainable business," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    6. Larissa Marchiori Pacheco & Marlon Fernandes Rodrigues Alves & Lara Bartocci Liboni, 2018. "Green absorptive capacity: A mediation‐moderation model of knowledge for innovation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(8), pages 1502-1513, December.
    7. John Duffy & Tatiana Kornienko, 2005. "Does Competition Affect Giving? An Experimental Study," Experimental 0508002, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Martin Beckenkamp & Heike Hennig-Schmidt & Frank P. Maier-Rigaud, 2007. "Cooperation in Symmetric and Asymmetric Prisoner's Dilemma Games," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2006_25, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
    9. Terzi, Ayse & Koedijk, Kees & Noussair, Charles N. & Pownall, Rachel, 2016. "Reference point heterogeneity," Other publications TiSEM 9ef0ddbd-8f52-4845-87b3-1, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    10. Seow Eng Ong & Davin Wang & Calvin Chua, 2023. "Disruptive Innovation and Real Estate Agency: The Disruptee Strikes Back," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 67(2), pages 287-317, August.
    11. Herrmann, Tabea & Hübler, Olaf & Menkhoff, Lukas & Schmidt, Ulrich, 2016. "Allais for the poor," Kiel Working Papers 2036, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    12. Christiane Goodfellow & Dirk Schiereck & Steffen Wippler, 2013. "Are behavioural finance equity funds a superior investment? A note on fund performance and market efficiency," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 14(2), pages 111-119, April.
    13. Berg, Joyce E. & Rietz, Thomas A., 2019. "Longshots, overconfidence and efficiency on the Iowa Electronic Market," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 271-287.
    14. Reckers, Philip M.J. & Sanders, Debra L. & Roark, Stephen J., 1994. "The Influence of Ethical Attitudes on Taxpayer Compliance," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 47(4), pages 825-836, December.
    15. Bier, Vicki & Gutfraind, Alexander, 2019. "Risk analysis beyond vulnerability and resilience – characterizing the defensibility of critical systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(2), pages 626-636.
    16. Sitinjak Elizabeth Lucky Maretha & Haryanti Kristiana & Kurniasari Widuri & Sasmito Yohanes Wisnu Djati, 2019. "Investor behavior based on personality and company life cycle," HOLISTICA – Journal of Business and Public Administration, Sciendo, vol. 10(2), pages 23-38, August.
    17. Theo Arentze & Tao Feng & Harry Timmermans & Jops Robroeks, 2012. "Context-dependent influence of road attributes and pricing policies on route choice behavior of truck drivers: results of a conjoint choice experiment," Transportation, Springer, vol. 39(6), pages 1173-1188, November.
    18. van den Bergh, J.C.J.M. & Botzen, W.J.W., 2015. "Monetary valuation of the social cost of CO2 emissions: A critical survey," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 33-46.
    19. Frank D. Hodge & Roger D. Martin & Jamie H. Pratt, 2006. "Audit Qualifications of Income†Decreasing Accounting Choices," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 23(2), pages 369-394, June.
    20. Philippe Fevrier & Sebastien Gay, 2005. "Informed Consent Versus Presumed Consent The Role of the Family in Organ Donations," HEW 0509007, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:16:p:8749-:d:608923. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.