IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0058650.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring Health System Strengthening: Application of the Balanced Scorecard Approach to Rank the Baseline Performance of Three Rural Districts in Zambia

Author

Listed:
  • Wilbroad Mutale
  • Peter Godfrey-Fausset
  • Margaret Tembo Mwanamwenge
  • Nkatya Kasese
  • Namwinga Chintu
  • Dina Balabanova
  • Neil Spicer
  • Helen Ayles

Abstract

Introduction: There is growing interest in health system performance and recently WHO launched a report on health systems strengthening emphasising the need for close monitoring using system-wide approaches. One recent method is the balanced scorecard system. There is limited application of this method in middle- and low-income countries. This paper applies the concept of balanced scorecard to describe the baseline status of three intervention districts in Zambia. Methodology: The Better Health Outcome through Mentoring and Assessment (BHOMA) project is a randomised step-wedged community intervention that aims to strengthen the health system in three districts in the Republic of Zambia. To assess the baseline status of the participating districts we used a modified balanced scorecard approach following the domains highlighted in the MOH 2011 Strategic Plan. Results: Differences in performance were noted by district and residence. Finance and service delivery domains performed poorly in all study districts. The proportion of the health workers receiving training in the past 12 months was lowest in Kafue (58%) and highest in Luangwa district (77%). Under service capacity, basic equipment and laboratory capacity scores showed major variation, with Kafue and Luangwa having lower scores when compared to Chongwe. The finance domain showed that Kafue and Chongwe had lower scores (44% and 47% respectively). Regression model showed that children's clinical observation scores were negatively correlated with drug availability (coeff −0.40, p = 0.02). Adult clinical observation scores were positively association with adult service satisfaction score (coeff 0.82, p = 0.04) and service readiness (coeff 0.54, p = 0.03). Conclusion: The study applied the balanced scorecard to describe the baseline status of 42 health facilities in three districts of Zambia. Differences in performance were noted by district and residence in most domains with finance and service delivery performing poorly in all study districts. This tool could be valuable in monitoring and evaluation of health systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Wilbroad Mutale & Peter Godfrey-Fausset & Margaret Tembo Mwanamwenge & Nkatya Kasese & Namwinga Chintu & Dina Balabanova & Neil Spicer & Helen Ayles, 2013. "Measuring Health System Strengthening: Application of the Balanced Scorecard Approach to Rank the Baseline Performance of Three Rural Districts in Zambia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(3), pages 1-11, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0058650
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058650
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0058650
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0058650&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0058650?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leonard, Kenneth L. & Masatu, Melkiory C., 2010. "Using the Hawthorne effect to examine the gap between a doctor's best possible practice and actual performance," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(2), pages 226-234, November.
    2. Gauld, Robin & Al-wahaibi, Suhaila & Chisholm, Johanna & Crabbe, Rebecca & Kwon, Boomi & Oh, Timothy & Palepu, Raja & Rawcliffe, Nic & Sohn, Stephen, 2011. "Scorecards for health system performance assessment: The New Zealand example," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(2), pages 200-208.
    3. Jeff Richardson & John Wildman & Iain K. Robertson, 2003. "A critique of the World Health Organisation's evaluation of health system performance," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 12(5), pages 355-366, May.
    4. Handler, A. & Issel, M. & Turnock, B., 2001. "A conceptual framework to measure performance of the public health system," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 91(8), pages 1235-1239.
    5. Anbrasi Edward & Binay Kumar & Faizullah Kakar & Ahmad Shah Salehi & Gilbert Burnham & David H Peters, 2011. "Configuring Balanced Scorecards for Measuring Health System Performance: Evidence from 5 Years' Evaluation in Afghanistan," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(7), pages 1-9, July.
    6. Edward Anbrasi & Binay Kumar & Faizullah Kakar & Ahmed Shah Salehi & Gilbert Burnham & David H Peters, 2011. "Configuring Balanced Scorecards for Measuring Health System Performance: Evidence from 5 Years’ Evaluation in Afghanistan," Working Papers id:4362, eSocialSciences.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joan T Price & Benjamin H Chi & Winifreda M Phiri & Helen Ayles & Namwinga Chintu & Roma Chilengi & Jeffrey S A Stringer & Wilbroad Mutale, 2018. "Associations between health systems capacity and mother-to-child HIV prevention program outcomes in Zambia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-13, September.
    2. Wilbroad Mutale & Jeffrey Stringer & Namwinga Chintu & Roma Chilengi & Margaret Tembo Mwanamwenge & Nkatya Kasese & Dina Balabanova & Neil Spicer & James Lewis & Helen Ayles, 2014. "Application of Balanced Scorecard in the Evaluation of a Complex Health System Intervention: 12 Months Post Intervention Findings from the BHOMA Intervention: A Cluster Randomised Trial in Zambia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(4), pages 1-10, April.
    3. Phillip Koni & Nathaniel Chishinga & Lameck Nyirenda & Prisca Kasonde & Richard Nsakanya & Michael Welsh, 2015. "Health Facility Graduation from Donor-Supported Intensive Technical Assistance and Associated Factors in Zambia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-13, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wilbroad Mutale & Jeffrey Stringer & Namwinga Chintu & Roma Chilengi & Margaret Tembo Mwanamwenge & Nkatya Kasese & Dina Balabanova & Neil Spicer & James Lewis & Helen Ayles, 2014. "Application of Balanced Scorecard in the Evaluation of a Complex Health System Intervention: 12 Months Post Intervention Findings from the BHOMA Intervention: A Cluster Randomised Trial in Zambia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(4), pages 1-10, April.
    2. Edward, Anbrasi & Branchini, Casey & Aitken, Iain & Roach, Melissa & Osei-Bonsu, Kojo & Arwal, Said Habib, 2015. "Toward universal coverage in Afghanistan: A multi-stakeholder assessment of capacity investments in the community health worker system," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 173-183.
    3. Carla Alexandra da Encarnação Filipe Amado & Olena Kalinichenko & Sérgio Pereira dos Santos, 2013. "Performance Assessment in Primary Health Care: A Systematic Literature Review," CEFAGE-UE Working Papers 2013_03, University of Evora, CEFAGE-UE (Portugal).
    4. Blen Getachew & Biruk Bizuneh & Birhanu Ewunetu & Dawit Kassahun & Dessalegn Fentahun & Destaw Ademe & Endeshaw Admasu Cherkos & Azmeraw Ambachew Kebede, 2022. "Willingness to work in rural areas and associated factors among graduating health students at the University of Gondar, northwest Ethiopia, 2021," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(10), pages 1-14, October.
    5. Claudiu CICEA, 2011. "Consideration Regarding Cost’S Evaluation In Healthcare Area," Business Excellence and Management, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 1(1), pages 37-48, December.
    6. Simons, Andrew M. & Beltramo, Theresa & Blalock, Garrick & Levine, David I., 2017. "Using unobtrusive sensors to measure and minimize Hawthorne effects: Evidence from cookstoves," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 68-80.
    7. Natina Yaduma & Mika Kortelainen & Ada Wossink, 2013. "Estimating Mortality and Economic Costs of Particulate Air Pollution in Developing Countries: The Case of Nigeria," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 54(3), pages 361-387, March.
    8. Nicholas Wilson, 2015. "Can Disease-Specific Funding Harm Health? in the Shadow of HIV/AIDS Service Expansion," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 52(5), pages 1671-1700, October.
    9. Fuhai Hong & Tanjim Hossain & John A. List & Migiwa Tanaka, 2018. "Testing The Theory Of Multitasking: Evidence From A Natural Field Experiment In Chinese Factories," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 59(2), pages 511-536, May.
    10. Vujicic, Marko & Shengelia, Bakhuti & Alfano, Marco & Thu, Ha Bui, 2011. "Physician shortages in rural Vietnam: Using a labor market approach to inform policy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(7), pages 970-977.
    11. Rudy Douven & Minke Remmerswaal & Robin Zoutenbier, 2015. "Do Extrinsically Motivated Mental Health Care Providers Have Better Treatment Outcomes?," CPB Discussion Paper 319.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    12. Faten Amer & Sahar Hammoud & Haitham Khatatbeh & Huda Alfatafta & Abdulsalam Alkaiyat & Abdulnaser Ibrahim Nour & Dóra Endrei & Imre Boncz, 2022. "How to Engage Health Care Workers in the Evaluation of Hospitals: Development and Validation of BSC-HCW1—A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-29, July.
    13. Muhammad Asef Shaiq & Ali Akbar Barati & Khalil Kalantari & Ali Asadi, 2022. "Dimensions of Poverty in Kunduz Province of Afghanistan," World, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-14, November.
    14. Berhanu Feysia & Christopher H. Herbst & Wuleta Lemma & Agnes Soucat, 2012. "The Health Workforce in Ethiopia : Addressing the Remaining Challenges," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 2226, April.
    15. Timothy Besley & Maitreesh Ghatak, 2005. "Competition and Incentives with Motivated Agents," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 95(3), pages 616-636, June.
    16. Walendzik, Anke & Noweski, Michael & Pomorin, Natalie & Wasem, Jürgen, 2019. "Belegärztliche Versorgung: Historie, Entwicklungsdeterminanten und Weiterentwicklungsoptionen," IBES Diskussionsbeiträge 227, University of Duisburg-Essen, Institute of Business and Economic Studie (IBES).
    17. Mariam Safi & Maja L. Bertram & Gabriel Gulis, 2020. "Assessing Delivery of Selected Public Health Operations via Essential Public Health Operation Framework," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-10, September.
    18. Yelin Fu & Yubing Sui & Hao Luo & Biao Han, 2020. "Application of Social Choice Theory to Modify the Value Measure of Health Systems," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 148(3), pages 1005-1019, April.
    19. Nigel Rice & Silvana Robone & Peter C. Smith, 2012. "Vignettes and health systems responsiveness in cross‐country comparative analyses," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 175(2), pages 337-369, April.
    20. Faten Amer & Sahar Hammoud & David Onchonga & Abdulsalam Alkaiyat & Abdulnaser Nour & Dóra Endrei & Imre Boncz, 2022. "Assessing Patient Experience and Attitude: BSC-PATIENT Development, Translation, and Psychometric Evaluation—A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-29, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0058650. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.