IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pgph00/0005281.html

Implementation and effects of social protection programs for children, older adults, and people with disabilities in Brazil and Ecuador: A scoping review

Author

Listed:
  • Julia M Pescarini
  • Ana L Moncayo
  • Joanna M N Guimarães
  • Francine S Dias
  • Ronald Ruiz
  • Samuel A G da Silva
  • Gustavo Casais
  • Michal Shimonovich
  • Valerie Wells
  • Mhairi Campbell
  • Mauricio L Barreto
  • S Vittal Katikireddi
  • Gustavo Matta
  • Peter Craig
  • on behalf of the Global Health Research Unit on the Social and, Environmental Determinants of Health Inequalities (SEDHI)

Abstract

We conducted a scoping review to investigate planned (intentional) and unplanned (not intentional) effects of social protection on socioeconomic determinants of health (SDH) and health inequalities among children, adolescents, elders and people with disabilities, and their caregivers. We reviewed seven programs in (i) Brazil (Programa Bolsa Familia (BFP) and Beneficio de Prestacao Continuada (BPC)), and (ii) Ecuador (Bono de Desarrolo Humano (BDH), Bono 1000 días, Pensión Mis Mejores Años/Pensión para Adultos Mayores, Pensión Toda una Vida/Pensión para personas con discapacidad and Bono Joaquín Gallegos Lara). We searched PubMed, EMBASE, LILACS, Scopus, Econlit, PsycINFO, Global Health, Global Index Medicus and grey literature for studies evaluating program implementation and effects on health outcomes or SDH from 1990 to 2023. We extracted data from 114 studies (84 on BFP, 17 on BDH and 13 on BPC). No studies were identified for the remaining programs. In Brazil, we found substantial evidence of BFP planned effects on children’s health and some SDH but little evidence on its unplanned effects in adults and caregivers. Evidence effects of BPC on health outcomes were scarce, with only one study in elders and none among people with disabilities. In Ecuador, we found evidence only for BDH, with some studies on planned health effects and few on SDH and its unplanned effects. Very few studies used longitudinal data, quasi-experimental designs, or comparison groups of eligible non-recipients. Finally, we found large variations coverage and implementation of programs. In summary, our review highlights the lack of evidence on the overall impacts of social protection in Ecuador, particularly those targeting older adults and people with disabilities. In Brazil, further research is needed on unplanned health effects of the BFP and on the impacts of social protection targeting elders and people with disabilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Julia M Pescarini & Ana L Moncayo & Joanna M N Guimarães & Francine S Dias & Ronald Ruiz & Samuel A G da Silva & Gustavo Casais & Michal Shimonovich & Valerie Wells & Mhairi Campbell & Mauricio L Barr, 2025. "Implementation and effects of social protection programs for children, older adults, and people with disabilities in Brazil and Ecuador: A scoping review," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(10), pages 1-22, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0005281
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0005281
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0005281
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0005281&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pgph.0005281?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cruz, Marcio & Ziegelhofer, Zacharias, 2014. "Beyond the income effect : impacts of conditional cash transfer programs on private investments in human capital," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6867, The World Bank.
    2. repec:plo:pone00:0220513 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Kassouf, Ana Lucia & de Oliveira, Pedro Rodrigues, 2012. "Impact evaluation of the brazilian non-contibutory pension program Beneficio de Prestaçao Continuada (BPC) on family welfare," PEP Working Papers 164405, Partnership for Economic Policy (PEP).
    4. Oosterbeek, Hessel & Ponce, Juan & Schady, Norbert, 2008. "The impact of cash transfers on school enrollment : evidence from Ecuador," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4645, The World Bank.
    5. Francesca Bastagli, 2009. "From Social Safety net to Social Policy? The Role of Conditional Cash Transfers in Welfare State Development in Latin America," Working Papers 60, International Policy Centre.
    6. Schady, Norbert & Araujo, Maria Caridad, 2006. "Cash transfers, conditions, school enrollment, and child work : evidence from a randomized experiment in Ecuador," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3930, The World Bank.
    7. Cecchini, Simone & Atuesta, Bernardo, 2017. "Conditional cash transfer programmes in Latin America and the Caribbean: Coverage and investment trends," Políticas Sociales 42109, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nabernegg, Markus, 2012. "El impacto del BDH en el gasto de bienes no deseados: Un análisis de regresión discontinua [The impact of the Bono de Desarrollo Humano in the expenditure for undesirable goods: A regression discon," MPRA Paper 41295, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Cecchini, Simone & Madariaga, Aldo, 2011. "Conditional cash transfer programmes: the recent experience in Latin America and the Caribbean," Cuadernos de la CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 27855 edited by Eclac.
    3. Ponce, Juan & Bedi, Arjun S., 2010. "The impact of a cash transfer program on cognitive achievement: The Bono de Desarrollo Humano of Ecuador," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 116-125, February.
    4. Levasseur Karine & Paterson Stephanie & Carvalho Moreira Nathalia, 2018. "Conditional and Unconditional Cash Transfers: Implications for Gender," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, June.
    5. Lídia Farré, 2013. "The Role of Men in the Economic and Social Development of Women: Implications for Gender Equality," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 28(1), pages 22-51, February.
    6. M. Caridad Araujo & Mariano Bosch & Norbert Schady, 2017. "Can Cash Transfers Help Households Escape an Intergenerational Poverty Trap?," NBER Chapters, in: The Economics of Poverty Traps, pages 357-382, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Carla Canelas & Miguel Niño‐Zarazúa, 2019. "Schooling and Labor Market Impacts of Bolivia's Bono Juancito Pinto Program," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 45(S1), pages 155-179, December.
    8. Miguel Nino-Zarazua, 2011. "Mexico’s Progresa-Oportunidades and the emergence of Social Assistance in Latin America," Global Development Institute Working Paper Series 14211, GDI, The University of Manchester.
    9. Dominic Richardson & UNICEF Office of Research - Innocenti, 2018. "Key Findings on Families, Family Policy and the Sustainable Development Goals: Synthesis Report," Papers inorer948, Innocenti Research Report.
    10. Emma Aguila & Jung Ho Park & Alma Vega, 2020. "Living Arrangements and Supplemental Income Programs for Older Adults in Mexico," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 57(4), pages 1345-1368, August.
    11. Marigee P. Bacolod & Priya Ranjan, 2008. "Why Children Work, Attend School, or Stay Idle: The Roles of Ability and Household Wealth," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 56(4), pages 791-828, July.
    12. Hidalgo, Diana & Onofa, Mercedes & Oosterbeek, Hessel & Ponce, Juan, 2013. "Can provision of free school uniforms harm attendance? Evidence from Ecuador," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 43-51.
    13. Ingvild Almås & Alex Armand & Orazio Attanasio & Pedro Carneiro, 2018. "Measuring and Changing Control: Women's Empowerment and Targeted Transfers," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 128(612), pages 609-639, July.
    14. Bergolo, Marcelo & Galván, Estefanía, 2018. "Intra-household Behavioral Responses to Cash Transfer Programs. Evidence from a Regression Discontinuity Design," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 100-118.
    15. Ferdinando Regalía & Leslie Castro, 2007. "Performance-based Incentives for Health: Demand- and Supply-Side Incentives in the Nicaraguan Red de Protección Social," Working Papers 119, Center for Global Development.
    16. Can Tang & Liqiu Zhao & Zhong Zhao, 2020. "Does free education help combat child labor? The effect of a free compulsory education reform in rural China," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 33(2), pages 601-631, April.
    17. Edmonds, Eric V. & Shrestha, Maheshwor, 2014. "You get what you pay for: Schooling incentives and child labor," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 196-211.
    18. Del Rey, Elena & Estevan, Fernanda, 2013. "Conditional cash transfers and education quality in the presence of credit constraints," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 76-84.
    19. Juan M. Villa & Miguel Niño-Zarazúa, 2019. "Poverty dynamics and graduation from conditional cash transfers: a transition model for Mexico’s Progresa-Oportunidades-Prospera program," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 17(2), pages 219-251, June.
    20. Felipe Barrera-Osorio & Marianne Bertrand & Leigh L. Linden & Francisco Perez-Calle, 2008. "Conditional Cash Transfers in Education Design Features, Peer and Sibling Effects Evidence from a Randomized Experiment in Colombia," NBER Working Papers 13890, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pgph00:0005281. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: globalpubhealth (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.