IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pid/journl/v55y2016i4p873-887.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fiscal Space for Investment in Agriculture—A Review of Taxes and Subsidies in Agriculture in Pakistan

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen Davies

    (Programme Leader, Pakistan Strategy Support Programme (PSSP), and Senior Research Fellow, IFPRI)

  • Wajiha Saeed

    (Research Analyst, Pakistan Strategy Support Programme (PSSP))

  • Muhammad Saad Moeen

    (Research Assistant, Pakistan Strategy Support Programme (PSSP))

  • Tehmina Tanveer

    (Research Analyst, Pakistan Strategy Support Programme (PSSP))

  • Aamer Irshad

    (Chief, Food and Agriculture, Planning Commission of Pakistan)

Abstract

Despite agriculture’s importance in terms of its relationship to poverty and welfare of the poorest households, the government finds it increasingly difficult to find the fiscal space for budgetary allocations for agriculture and agricultural R&D. We hypothesise that expansion of expenditures on agriculture is possible in the short to medium run with a combination of re-allocations and new taxation. We argue that existing spending aimed towards the agriculture sector includes very large outlays on implicit subsidies that are largely unproductive. These costs include: subsidisation of gas for fertiliser plants, which approach Rs 48 billion in gas subsidies to fertiliser companies; the full costs of the infrastructure and operation and maintenance of the irrigation system, which amount to Rs 166 billion per year; and losses on wheat procurement, which have been about Rs 25 billion recently. On the taxation side, while agricultural producers are not currently liable to pay tax on income, they do however pay indirect taxes on agricultural inputs. Using a Social Accounting Matrix (SAM), we estimate agricultural producer pay about Rs 61 billion, mostly from GST taxes on fertiliser. Using a Computable General Equilibrium model, we show that agriculture could contribute further with an income tax on agricultural income. With a “low-rate-wide-base” income tax of 15 percent on non-poor, medium and large farms, as much as Rs 130 billion could be raised, enough to cover, for example, a sizable portion of the operation and maintenance cost of the irrigation system.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen Davies & Wajiha Saeed & Muhammad Saad Moeen & Tehmina Tanveer & Aamer Irshad, 2016. "Fiscal Space for Investment in Agriculture—A Review of Taxes and Subsidies in Agriculture in Pakistan," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 55(4), pages 873-887.
  • Handle: RePEc:pid:journl:v:55:y:2016:i:4:p:873-887
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.pide.org.pk/pdf/PDR/2016/Volume4/873-887.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Dorosh & Abdul Salam, 2008. "Wheat Markets and Price Stabilisation in Pakistan: An Analysis of Policy Options," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 47(1), pages 71-87.
    2. Debowicz, Darío & Dorosh, Paul A. & Robinson, Sherman & Haider, Syed Hamza, 2012. "A 2007-08 social accounting matrix for Pakistan," PSSP working papers 1, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fazal Husain & Abdul Qayyum, 2006. "Stock Market Liberalisations in the South Asian Region," PIDE-Working Papers 2006:6, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.
    2. Sahito, Jam Ghulam Murtaza, 2015. "Market integration of wheat in Pakistan," Discussion Papers 72, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Center for international Development and Environmental Research (ZEU).
    3. Salam, Abdul, 2012. "Review of input and output policies for cereals production in Pakistan," PSSP working papers 6, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    4. Mariano, Marc Jim M. & Giesecke, James A., 2014. "The macroeconomic and food security implications of price interventions in the Philippine rice market," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 350-361.
    5. Abdul Qayyum & A. R. Kemal, 2006. "Volatility Spillover between the Stock Market and the Foreign Market in Pakistan," Finance Working Papers 22216, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    6. Briones Alonso, Elena & Swinnen, Johan, 2016. "Who are the producers and consumers? Value chains and food policy effects in the wheat sector in Pakistan," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 40-58.
    7. Robinson, Sherman & Gueneau, Arthur, 2014. "Economic evaluation of the Diamer-Basha dam: Analysis with an integrated economic/water simulation model of Pakistan," PSSP working papers 14, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    8. Muhammad Abdullah Khalid & Yousaf Ali, 2020. "Economic impact assessment of natural disaster with multi-criteria decision making for interdependent infrastructures," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(8), pages 7287-7311, December.
    9. Elena Briones Alonso & Jo Swinnen, 2015. "A value chain approach to measuring distortions to incentives and food policy effects (with application to Pakistan’s grain policy)," Working Papers of Department of Economics, Leuven 493428, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), Department of Economics, Leuven.
    10. Dorosh, Paul A. & Salam, Abdul, 2007. "Distortions to Agricultural Incentives in Pakistan," Agricultural Distortions Working Paper Series 48482, World Bank.
    11. Pieters, Hannah & Swinnen, Johan, 2016. "Trading-off volatility and distortions? Food policy during price spikes," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 27-39.
    12. Unknown, 2011. "Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, Volume 07, Issue 2," Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, vol. 7(2), pages 1-93.
    13. Debowicz, Darío & Saeed, Wajiha, 2014. "Exchange rate misalignment in Pakistan and its general equilibrium distributional implications," PSSP working papers 16, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    14. Gulzar Ali & Zhaohua Li, 2017. "An Empirical Investigation on the Role of exports, imports and its Determinants in Foreign Trade of Pakistan," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 8(6), pages 39-58.
    15. Abdul SALAM*, 2010. "Distortions in Prices of Food Grains in Pakistan: 1996 to 2006," Pakistan Journal of Applied Economics, Applied Economics Research Centre, vol. 20, pages 13-28.
    16. Ali Naqvi & Miriam Rehm, 2014. "A multi-agent model of a low income economy: simulating the distributional effects of natural disasters," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 9(2), pages 275-309, October.
    17. Lindsay Shutes & Marijke Kuiper, 2015. "Expanding the household coverage of global simulation models: an application to Ghana," FOODSECURE Technical papers 3, LEI Wageningen UR.
    18. Abdul Salam, 2012. "Review of Input and Output Policies for Cereals Production in Pakistan," Working Papers id:5176, eSocialSciences.
    19. Abdul Jalil & Fahd Zulfiqar & Muhammad Aqeel Anwar & Nasir Iqbal & Saud Ahmed Khan, 2020. "Wheat Support Price: A Note For Policy Makers," PIDE Knowledge Brief 2020:18, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.
    20. Abdul Jalil & Fahd Zulfiqar & Muhammad Aqeel Anwar & Nasir Iqbal & Saud Ahmed Khan, 2023. "Wheat Support Price: A Note for Policymakers (Policy)," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 62(1), pages 115-124.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agriculture; Fiscal Policy; Subsidies; Taxation; General Equilibrium; Social Accounting Matrix; Pakistan;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D58 - Microeconomics - - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium - - - Computable and Other Applied General Equilibrium Models
    • E16 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - General Aggregative Models - - - Social Accounting Matrix
    • H20 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - General
    • H22 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Incidence
    • H23 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Externalities; Redistributive Effects; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies
    • Q10 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pid:journl:v:55:y:2016:i:4:p:873-887. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Khurram Iqbal (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pideipk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.