Author
Abstract
With accelerating advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, which have provided new possibilities for language learning and teaching, this study explored the factors influencing the use of a popular AI tool, ChatGPT, for English language learning among post-secondary students in Saudi Arabia. A technology acceptance model (TAM) questionnaire was administered, which yielded 184 responses (31 males, and 153 females). The results revealed that the perceived ease of use and usefulness significantly affected ChatGPT adoption. However, no significant relationship was found between perceived ease of use and attitudes, suggesting that learners’ attitudes were influenced more by the tool’s benefits and value for language learning. A strong positive relationship was found between Perceived Usefulness (PU) and Attitude (AT), indicating that when learners perceive ChatGPT as useful, they have favourable attitudes toward it. Educators should emphasize these benefits and integrate ChatGPT into English as a foreign language (EFL) classroom to enhance language skills. A positive attitude toward ChatGPT leads to stronger behavioural intention to use it, which positively predicts actual use. Other factors, such as gender, education level, duration of usage, and IT skills, were also examined. The results showed that female respondents had more positive attitudes; master’s students perceived it as easier to use than diploma students; and longer usage durations were linked to a higher perceived ease of use. Understanding the impact of these factors can inform the integration of AI-powered tools in EFL teaching and learning environments, with interventions and support systems that promote learners’ intentions to use these tools and facilitate their actual usage.
Suggested Citation
Hind M. Alotaibi & Suhad S. Sonbul & Dina A. El-Dakhs, 2025.
"Factors influencing the acceptance and use of ChatGPT among English as a foreign language learners in Saudi Arabia,"
Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
Handle:
RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-04945-2
DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-04945-2
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-04945-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.