IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/palcom/v12y2025i1d10.1057_s41599-024-04320-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scaling to new heights: methodological insights for uplifting research on grassroots digital innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Paolo Gerli

    (Edinburgh Napier University)

  • Fabio Neves da Rocha

    (Edinburgh Napier University)

  • Luca Mora

    (Edinburgh Napier University
    Tallinn University of Technology)

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic has further evidenced the potential of grassroots actors as initiators of digital innovations, in the form of open-source applications, platform cooperatives, and other crowdsourced digital artifacts. These innovations played a crucial role in mitigating the impact of lockdown measures, specifically serving the needs of communities often neglected by commercial offerings from large tech companies. Grassroots digital innovations (GDIs) have long been recognized by scholars and policymakers as potential remedies to market distortions and social iniquities within digitalization processes. Nevertheless, these initiatives have historically struggled to become sustainable. Recent evidence confirms that many GDIs developed in response to the global health crisis are now facing financial issues that threaten their survival. In this commentary, we reflect on this challenge and assert that GDI literature exhibits several shortcomings that contribute to undermining the long-term stability of these initiatives and their capacity to foster more inclusive, just, and sustainable digitalization processes. We examine how these shortcomings can be addressed to enhance both GDI research and practice. Our discussion focuses on three major methodological and conceptual limitations: a tendency towards theory-devoid empiricism, a bias towards successful cases, and a dearth of longitudinal, multi-site analyses. We discuss the causes of each shortcoming and illustrate how they impact both the theoretical and practical development of GDIs. Drawing on this critical examination, we identify four priorities to advance future GDI research: leveraging methodological pluralism, applying theoretical sampling, enhancing qualitative longitudinal research, and strengthening methods for data collection and archival. These priorities aim to inform the agendas of academic communities, funding bodies, and policy institutions dedicated to harnessing the potential of GDIs for more sustainable and inclusive digitalization processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Paolo Gerli & Fabio Neves da Rocha & Luca Mora, 2025. "Scaling to new heights: methodological insights for uplifting research on grassroots digital innovation," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-04320-7
    DOI: 10.1057/s41599-024-04320-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41599-024-04320-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41599-024-04320-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Scuotto, Veronica & Magni, Domitilla & Garcia-Perez, Alexeis & Pironti, Marco, 2024. "The impact of innovation failure: Entrepreneurship adversity or opportunity?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    2. Pengfei Fu & Lin Li & Xuefang Xie, 2022. "Reconstructing makerspaces in China: mass innovation space and the transformative creative industries," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-8, December.
    3. Paolo Borghi & Annalisa Murgia & Mathilde Mondon-Navazo & Petr Mezihorak, 2021. "Mind the gap between discourses and practices: Platform workers’ representation in France and Italy," European Journal of Industrial Relations, , vol. 27(4), pages 425-443, December.
    4. Paolo Gerli & Jason Whalley, 2021. "Fibre to the countryside: a comparison of public and community initiatives tackling the rural digital divide in the UK," Post-Print hal-04930687, HAL.
    5. Sanjay K. Arora & Yin Li & Jan Youtie & Philip Shapira, 2016. "Using the wayback machine to mine websites in the social sciences: A methodological resource," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 67(8), pages 1904-1915, August.
    6. Hans-Gerd Ridder, 2017. "The theory contribution of case study research designs," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 10(2), pages 281-305, October.
    7. Salemink, Koen & Strijker, Dirk, 2018. "The participation society and its inability to correct the failure of market players to deliver adequate service levels in rural areas," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(9), pages 757-765.
    8. Imad A. Moosa, 2019. "The fragility of results and bias in empirical research: an exploratory exposition," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(4), pages 347-360, October.
    9. Andrew M. Pettigrew, 1990. "Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 1(3), pages 267-292, August.
    10. Sjögren, Hans & Yusuf, Fahmi & Sanandaji, Tino, 2020. "Profiles of Entrepreneurial Success in a Welfare State: Using Statistical Prosopography and Cluster Analysis to Classify Top Swedish Entrepreneurs," SSE Working Paper Series in Economic History 2020:1, Stockholm School of Economics.
    11. Richard M. Walker & Oliver James & Gene A. Brewer, 2017. "Replication, experiments and knowledge in public management research," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(9), pages 1221-1234, October.
    12. Lynne Chester, 2021. "A Case of Confirmation Bias," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(3), pages 584-589, July.
    13. Stremersch, Stefan & Camacho, Nuno & Keko, Elio & Wuyts, Stefan, 2022. "Grassroots innovation success: The role of self-determination and leadership style," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 396-414.
    14. Casey R. Lynch, 2021. "Internet infrastructure and the commons: grassroots knowledge sharing in Barcelona," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(12), pages 1868-1877, December.
    15. Peter Musinguzi & Derek Baker & Nicolette Larder & Renato A. Villano, 2023. "The measurement of social impacts in rural social enterprises: a systematic literature review and future research implications," Regional Studies, Regional Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 139-166, December.
    16. Aikaterini Valvi & Constantinos Frangos & Christos Frangos, 2013. "Online and mobile customer behaviour: a critical evaluation of Grounded Theory studies," Behaviour and Information Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(7), pages 655-667.
    17. Berka, Anna L. & Creamer, Emily, 2018. "Taking stock of the local impacts of community owned renewable energy: A review and research agenda," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 3400-3419.
    18. Attila Havas & Doris Schartinger & K. Matthias Weber, 2022. "Innovation Studies, Social Innovation, and Sustainability Transitions Research: From mutual ignorance towards an integrative perspective?," CERS-IE WORKING PAPERS 2227, Institute of Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies.
    19. Olga Vincent, 2023. "An economy in the making: Negotiating capitalist and beyond-capitalist ontologies and relations in makerspaces," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 55(1), pages 3-21, February.
    20. Thomas Wrona & Markus Gunnesch, 2016. "The one who sees more is more right: how theory enhances the ‘repertoire to interpret’ in qualitative case study research," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 86(7), pages 723-749, October.
    21. Bacq, Sophie & Geoghegan, Will & Josefy, Matthew & Stevenson, Regan & Williams, Trenton A., 2020. "The COVID-19 Virtual Idea Blitz: Marshaling social entrepreneurship to rapidly respond to urgent grand challenges," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 63(6), pages 705-723.
    22. Sushanta Kumar Sarma, 2020. "Investigating Failed Social Entrepreneurship: A ‘Process Research’ Perspective," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: Satyajit Majumdar & Edakkandi Meethal Reji (ed.), Methodological Issues in Social Entrepreneurship Knowledge and Practice, chapter 0, pages 79-93, Springer.
    23. Rohny Saylors & Amrita Lahiri & Benjamin Warnick & Chandresh Baid, 2023. "Looking Back To Venture Forward: Exploring Idea and Identity Work in Public Failure Narratives," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 47(2), pages 398-429, March.
    24. Gerli, Paolo & Whalley, Jason, 2021. "Fibre to the countryside: A comparison of public and community initiatives tackling the rural digital divide in the UK," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(10).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wei Chen & Hongti Song, 2025. "Digital village construction and national innovation systems: coordinated development dynamics," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Davenport, Sally, 2005. "Exploring the role of proximity in SME knowledge-acquisition," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 683-701, June.
    3. Battaglia, Daniele & Landoni, Paolo & Rizzitelli, Francesco, 2017. "Organizational structures for external growth of University Technology Transfer Offices: An explorative analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 45-56.
    4. Sternitzke, Christian, 2013. "An exploratory analysis of patent fencing in pharmaceuticals: The case of PDE5 inhibitors," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 542-551.
    5. Gebauer, Heiko & Worch, Hagen & Truffer, Bernhard, 2012. "Absorptive capacity, learning processes and combinative capabilities as determinants of strategic innovation," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 57-73.
    6. León-Bravo, Verónica & Caniato, Federico, 2024. "Sustainability performance measurement in the food supply chain: Trade-offs, institutional pressures, and contextual factors," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 633-646.
    7. Mariani, Marcello M. & Giorgio, Luisa, 2017. "The “Pink Night” festival revisited: Meta-events and the role of destination partnerships in staging event tourism," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 89-109.
    8. Innan Sasaki & Niina Nummela & Davide Ravasi, 2021. "Managing cultural specificity and cultural embeddedness when internationalizing: Cultural strategies of Japanese craft firms," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 52(2), pages 245-281, March.
    9. Bağış, Mehmet & Kryeziu, Liridon & Akbaba, Yılmaz & Ramadani, Veland & Karagüzel, Ensar Selman & Krasniqi, Besnik A., 2022. "The micro-foundations of a dynamic technological capability in the automotive industry," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    10. Petr Hlavacek & Vladim r Skaln k, 2021. "The Implementation of Smart Energy into Transformation of the Rural Area: The Use of Public Policies for Smart Villages Development," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(4), pages 1-6.
    11. Richard L. Gruner & Damien Power, 2023. "Conceptual wanderlust: How to develop creative supply chain theory with analogies," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 59(4), pages 3-21, October.
    12. Simeone, Luca & Secundo, Giustina & Schiuma, Giovanni, 2017. "Adopting a design approach to translate needs and interests of stakeholders in academic entrepreneurship: The MIT Senseable City Lab case," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 64, pages 58-67.
    13. repec:osf:osfxxx:79k4e_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. repec:bpd:articl:v:1:y:2018:i:2:jbpa.12.34 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. repec:vnm:wpdman:77 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Palo, Teea & Åkesson, Maria & Löfberg, Nina, 2019. "Servitization as business model contestation: A practice approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 486-496.
    17. Christoph Friedrich & Daniel Feser, 2024. "Combining knowledge bases for small wins in peripheral regions. An analysis of the role of innovation intermediaries in sustainability transitions," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 44(2), pages 211-236, June.
    18. Jensen, Peter D. Ørberg, 2012. "A passage to India: A dual case study of activities, processes and resources in offshore outsourcing of advanced services," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 311-326.
    19. Simona Stojanova & Nina Cvar & Jurij Verhovnik & Nataša Božić & Jure Trilar & Andrej Kos & Emilija Stojmenova Duh, 2022. "Rural Digital Innovation Hubs as a Paradigm for Sustainable Business Models in Europe’s Rural Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-20, November.
    20. Ricardo A. Santa & Alejandro Acosta & Silvio Borrero & Annibal Scavarda, 2020. "Corporate, operational, and information systems strategies: Alignment and firm performance," Estudios Gerenciales, Universidad Icesi, vol. 36(157), pages 454-464, December.
    21. Maarten B.T. de Groot & Oli R. Mihalache & Tom Elfring, 2022. "Toward a Theory of Family Social Capital in Wealthy Transgenerational Enterprise Families," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 46(1), pages 159-192, January.
    22. Bargoni, Augusto & Santoro, Gabriele & Messeni Petruzzelli, Antonio & Ferraris, Alberto, 2024. "Growth hacking: A critical review to clarify its meaning and guide its practical application," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    23. Islam, A.K.M. Najmul & Mäntymäki, Matti & Turunen, Marja, 2019. "Why do blockchains split? An actor-network perspective on Bitcoin splits," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-024-04320-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.