IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/abaman/v24y2025i2d10.1057_s41291-024-00286-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Japan–US differences and R&D investments in response to performance feedback

Author

Listed:
  • K. Skylar Powell

    (Western Washington University)

  • Eunah Lim

    (Western Washington University)

  • Valerie Alexandra

    (San Diego State University)

  • Mooweon Rhee

    (Yonsei University)

Abstract

We investigate effects of culturally situated differences in cognition on Japanese and US firms’ responses to performance feedback through R&D investments. Performance feedback research has mostly assumed a universal nature of decision makers’ cognition and responses. We posit firms from Japan should have a more holistic cognitive orientation than US firms, making them less responsive to problemistic and slack search mechanisms of performance feedback when making R&D investments. These expectations are largely supported in the context of 37 Japanese and 19 US automotive firms (546 firm-year-observations) from 2003 to 2019. We find further support using data on 106 global automotive firms (902 firm-year-observations), from 14 holistic or analytic oriented countries. This study establishes the culturally situated cognitive-orientation theoretical construct as a moderator of problemistic and slack search. Additionally, managers could adopt decision-making processes reflecting both holistic and analytic cognitive orientations while responding to performance feedback, to avoid biases.

Suggested Citation

  • K. Skylar Powell & Eunah Lim & Valerie Alexandra & Mooweon Rhee, 2025. "Japan–US differences and R&D investments in response to performance feedback," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(2), pages 218-248, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:abaman:v:24:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1057_s41291-024-00286-1
    DOI: 10.1057/s41291-024-00286-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41291-024-00286-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41291-024-00286-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:abaman:v:24:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1057_s41291-024-00286-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.