IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ajagec/v82y2000i3p570-580.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How to Improve the Management of Renewable Resources: The Case of Canada's Northern Cod Fishery

Author

Listed:
  • R. Quentin Grafton
  • Leif K. Sandal
  • Stein Ivar Steinshamn

Abstract

The paper examines howan easy-to-apply optimal feedback rule can be used to solve for optimal levels of exploitation of a renewable resource. Using data from Canada's northern cod fishery, the optimal feedback rule is used to derive optimal levels of exploitation for the years 1962–91 under different discount rates, alternative model specifications, and parameter assumptions. The optimal feedback rule indicates that over much of the period the fishery was economically overexploited and, given the stock development that actually took place, a harvesting moratorium should have been instituted three years earlier than when it was introduced. The results show how the use of a simple and flexible optimal rule by managers of renewable resources can generate substantial gains. Copyright 2000, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • R. Quentin Grafton & Leif K. Sandal & Stein Ivar Steinshamn, 2000. "How to Improve the Management of Renewable Resources: The Case of Canada's Northern Cod Fishery," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 82(3), pages 570-580.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:82:y:2000:i:3:p:570-580
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/0002-9092.00047
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ho Geun Jang & Satoshi Yamazaki & Eriko Hoshino, 2019. "Profit and equity trade‐offs in the management of small pelagic fisheries: the case of the Japanese sardine fishery," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 63(3), pages 549-574, July.
    2. Sandal, Leif K. & Berge, Gerhard, 2004. "A method for numerical and analytical solutions to a class of nonlinear optimal control problems," Discussion Papers 2004/2, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science.
    3. Ussif, Al-Amin M. & Sumaila, Ussif R., 2005. "Modeling the dynamics of regulated resource systems: a fishery example," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(4), pages 469-479, March.
    4. Petersen, Elizabeth H., 2002. "Economic Policy, Institutions And Fisheries Development In The Pacific," 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA 19606, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    5. R. Quentin Grafton & Tom Kompas & Pham Van Ha, 2006. "The Economic Payoffs from Marine Reserves: Resource Rents in a Stochastic Environment," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 82(259), pages 469-480, December.
    6. Maroto, Jose M. & Moran, Manuel, 2014. "Detecting the presence of depensation in collapsed fisheries: The case of the Northern cod stock," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 101-109.
    7. R. Quentin Grafton & Tom Kompas & Pham Van Ha, 2009. "Cod Today and None Tomorrow: The Economic Value of a Marine Reserve," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 85(3), pages 454-469.
    8. LK Sandal & SI Steinshamn, 2001. "A Bio‐Economic Model For Namibian Pilchard," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 69(2), pages 299-318, June.
    9. Doole, Graeme J. & Alexander, Robert R., 2005. "Importance of user cost to the optimal management of multiplecohort fish populations," 2005 Conference (49th), February 9-11, 2005, Coff's Harbour, Australia 137839, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    10. Tom Kompas & Pham Van Ha & R. Quentin Grafton, 2004. "Saving the Seas: The Economic Justification for Marine Reserves," International and Development Economics Working Papers idec04-3, International and Development Economics.
    11. Golubtsov, Peter & Steinshamn, Stein Ivar, 2019. "Analytical and numerical investigation of optimal harvest with a continuously age-structured model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 392(C), pages 67-81.
    12. Diwakar Poudel & Leif K. Sandal & Sturla F. Kvamsdal, 2015. "Stochastically Induced Critical Depensation and Risk of Stock Collapse," Marine Resource Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 30(3), pages 297-313.
    13. Poudel, Diwakar & Sandal, Leif K. & Steinshamn, Stein I. & Kvamsdal, Sturla F., 2012. "Do Species Interactions and Stochasticity Matter to Optimal Management of Multispecies Fisheries?," Discussion Papers 2012/1, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Business and Management Science.
    14. R. Quentin Grafton & Ragnar Arnason & Trond Bjorndal & David Campbell & Harry F. Campbell & Colin W. Clark & Robin Connor & Diane P. Dupont & Rognvaldur Hannesson & Ray Hilborn & James E. Kirkley & To, 2005. "Incentive-based approaches to sustainable fisheries (now replaced by EEN0508)," Economics and Environment Network Working Papers 0501, Australian National University, Economics and Environment Network.
    15. Sandal, Leif K. & Steinshamn, Stein Ivar & Grafton, R. Quentin, 2003. ""More is less": the tax effects of ignoring flow externalities," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 239-254, August.
    16. Trond Bjørndal & Ana Brasão, 2004. "The Northern Atlantic Bluefin Tuna Fisheries: Management and Policy Implications," Working Papers 2004.69, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    17. Jules Selles, 2018. "Fisheries management: what uncertainties matter?," Working Papers hal-01824238, HAL.
    18. R. Quentin Grafton & Tom Kompas, 2014. "Three Pillars of Fisheries Policy," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 1(3), pages 609-614, September.
    19. Grafton, R. Quentin & Squires, Dale & Steinshamn, Stein Ivar, 2023. "Towards resilience-based management of marine capture fisheries," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 231-238.
    20. Krysiak, Frank C. & Krysiak, Daniela, 2002. "Aggregation of Dynamic Systems and the Existence of a Regeneration Function," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 517-539, November.
    21. Sarkar, Sudipto, 2009. "Optimal fishery harvesting rules under uncertainty," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 272-286, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ajagec:v:82:y:2000:i:3:p:570-580. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.