IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nse/ecosta/ecostat_2020_517t_13.html

What Should the Concept of Domestic Production Mean in Globalized Economies?

Author

Listed:
  • Didier Blanchet

Abstract

[eng] Traditional criticisms of GDP generally focus on its ‘P’ and ‘G’, the fact it is only a measure of gross output, without offering any insight into well-being and sustainability. Globalization adds in the ‘D’ problem, with the increasing difficulty of determining the location of major segments of production by multinational companies. When distinct factors contribute to production from several sites, there is effectively no analytical way of characterizing what each of these factors produces on its own in each of these sites, a fortiori for intangible factors that are located in a purely conventional way. An interpretation of GDP in terms of income avoids this problem; it invites us to distinguish between income associated with mobile or volatile factors and income attributed to factors that can be deemed purely domestic. It also clarifies the links with the issue of measuring well-being.

Suggested Citation

  • Didier Blanchet, 2020. "What Should the Concept of Domestic Production Mean in Globalized Economies?," Economie et Statistique / Economics and Statistics, Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques (INSEE), issue 517-518-5, pages 205-214.
  • Handle: RePEc:nse:ecosta:ecostat_2020_517t_13
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.24187/ecostat.2020.517t.2019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://insee.fr/en/statistiques/fichier/4770168/13-ES_517-518-519_Blanchet_ENWeb.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.24187/ecostat.2020.517t.2019?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philippe Aghion & Antonin Bergeaud & Timo Boppart & Peter J. Klenow & Huiyu Li, 2019. "Missing Growth from Creative Destruction," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 109(8), pages 2795-2822, August.
    2. Didier Blanchet & Marc Fleurbaey, 2020. "Building Indicators for Inclusive Growth and its Sustainability: What Can the National Accounts Offer and How Can They Be Supplemented?," Economie et Statistique / Economics and Statistics, Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques (INSEE), issue 517-518-5, pages 9-24.
    3. Alexandre Bourgeois, 2020. "Free Services from the Digital Economy: Do We Need to Measure Their Value and How?," Economie et Statistique / Economics and Statistics, Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques (INSEE), issue 517-518-5, pages 157-172.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paul Schreyer, 2021. "Framing Measurement Beyond GDP," CEPA Working Papers Series WP172021, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    2. Alexandre Bourgeois & Jacques Blanchet & André Magniez & Ronan Vanoli, 2020. "Free Services from the Digital Economy: Do We Need to Measure Their Value and How? [Les services gratuits issus de l’économie numérique : faut‑il, et comment, les valoriser ?]," Post-Print hal-05290592, HAL.
    3. Alexandre Bourgeois, 2020. "Free Services from the Digital Economy: Do We Need to Measure Their Value and How?," Economie et Statistique / Economics and Statistics, Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques (INSEE), issue 517-518-5, pages 157-172.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Janice Eberly & John G. Fernald, 2022. "Jackson Hole 2022 - Reassessing Economic Constraints: Potential Output (The Impact of COVID on Productivity and Potential Output)," Proceedings - Economic Policy Symposium - Jackson Hole, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, August.
    2. Jacques Le Cacheux, 2017. "Croissance potentielle : la politique économique au royaume des aveugles ?," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 68(HS1), pages 29-39.
    3. Andrew T. Foerster & Andreas Hornstein & Pierre-Daniel G. Sarte & Mark W. Watson, 2022. "Aggregate Implications of Changing Sectoral Trends," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 130(12), pages 3286-3333.
    4. Didier Blanchet, 2020. "What Should the Concept of Domestic Production Mean in Globalized Economies? [Quelle signification pour le concept de produit intérieur dans des économies mondialisées ?]," Post-Print hal-05290813, HAL.
    5. Thibaut Duprey & Artur Kotlicki & Daniel E. Rigobon & Philip Schnattinger, 2024. "Bouncing Back: How Mothballing Curbs Prices," Staff Working Papers 24-51, Bank of Canada.
    6. Hamano, Masashige, 2022. "International risk sharing with heterogeneous firms," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    7. Adam Gorajek, 2024. "Generalizing the Stochastic Approach to Price Indexes," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 70(1), pages 80-101, March.
    8. Wildmer Daniel Gregori & Maria Martinez Cillero & Michela Nardo, 2022. "The effects of cross-border acquisitions on firms’ productivity in the EU," Working Papers 2022.10, International Network for Economic Research - INFER.
    9. Magnus Henrekson & Dan Johansson & Johan Karlsson, 2024. "To Be or Not to Be: The Entrepreneur in Neo-Schumpeterian Growth Theory," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 48(1), pages 104-140, January.
    10. J.-M. Germain, 2020. "A Welfare Based Estimate of “Real Feel GDP” for Europe and the USA," Documents de Travail de l'Insee - INSEE Working Papers g2020-03, Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques.
    11. Clément Carbonnier, 2023. "Welfare Economics and Neoliberalism: Interpreting the ideal type of perfect competition general equilibrium," Sciences Po Economics Publications (main) hal-04062786, HAL.
    12. David Ahlstrom & Amber Y. Chang & Jessie S. T. Cheung, 2019. "Encouraging Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-14, November.
    13. Tomoyuki Yagi & Kakuho Furukawa & Jouchi Nakajima, 2022. "Productivity Trends in Japan - Reviewing Recent Facts and the Prospects for the Post-COVID-19 Era -," Bank of Japan Working Paper Series 22-E-10, Bank of Japan.
    14. Wulong Gu & Michael Willox, 2018. "Productivity Growth in Canada and the United States: Recent Industry Trends and Potential Explanations," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 35, pages 73-94, Fall.
    15. John G. Fernald & Robert E. Hall & James H. Stock & Mark W. Watson, 2017. "The Disappointing Recovery of Output after 2009," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 48(1 (Spring), pages 1-81.
    16. Pereira, Guillermo Ivan & Specht, Jan Martin & Silva, Patrícia Pereira & Madlener, Reinhard, 2018. "Technology, business model, and market design adaptation toward smart electricity distribution: Insights for policy making," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 426-440.
    17. Nicholas Crafts, 2017. "Is Slow Economic Growth the ‘New Normal’ for Europe?," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 45(3), pages 283-297, September.
    18. Ian Goldin & Pantelis Koutroumpis & François Lafond & Julian Winkler, 2024. "Why Is Productivity Slowing Down?," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 62(1), pages 196-268, March.
    19. Ernest Liu & Atif Mian & Amir Sufi, 2022. "Low Interest Rates, Market Power, and Productivity Growth," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 90(1), pages 193-221, January.
    20. Evguenia Bessonova & Anna Tsvetkova, 2019. "Productivity convergence trends within Russian industries: firm-level evidence," Bank of Russia Working Paper Series wps51, Bank of Russia.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • E01 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - General - - - Measurement and Data on National Income and Product Accounts and Wealth; Environmental Accounts
    • E23 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Production
    • F6 - International Economics - - Economic Impacts of Globalization
    • O3 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nse:ecosta:ecostat_2020_517t_13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Veronique Egloff (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inseefr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.