IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nos/voprob/2019i4p71-92.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Success and Failure of School Students: Parental Expectations and Teachers' Perceptions

Author

Listed:
  • Tatyana Klyachko
  • Elena Semionova
  • Galina Tokareva

Abstract

Tatiana Klyachko - Doctor of Sciences in Economics, Director of the Center for Lifelong Learning Economics. E-mail: tlk@ranepa.ru.Elena Semionova - Candidate of Sciences in Economics, Leading Researcher. E-mail: semionova-ea@ranepa.ru.Galina Tokareva - Research Fellow. E-mail: tokareva-gs@ranepa.ru.Center for Lifelong Learning Economics, Institute of Applied Economic Research, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education.Address: 82 Vernadskogo Ave, 119571 Moscow, Russian Federation.The article presents the results of RANEPA Center for Lifelong Learning Economics' Monitoring of Efficiency of School Education concerning teachers' and parents' perceptions of student achievement. The study involved analysis of official statistics and data from sociological surveys of parents, teachers, and school administrators across different types of communities structured by the level of socioeconomic development.The fact that student achievement is largely contingent on teacher expertise is beyond dispute. It turns out, however, that teachers also attribute poor student performance to low parental involvement, socioeconomic disadvantage, health issues, and irresponsible student behavior. According to teachers, the proportion of students unable to cope with the curriculum increases consistently from grade to grade, peaking in Grades 8 and 9. Better student performance in Grades 10-11 (high school) may be explained by withdrawal of some students after completing the middle school level.Most parents perceive their children's academic performance to be above average. At the same time, along with teachers, parents report a decline in student achievement in middle school. Families attribute this downswing in performance to various factors, including lack of subject-specific abilities, challenging curricula, and decline in student engagement. Only 9.3% of parents consider teaching quality to be a factor of low student performance. Lower average family income is associated with higher frequency of reporting low child performance at school. The influence of family income on student achievement may be explained, in particular, by differences in the opportunity to buy extra tuition, including private tutoring.

Suggested Citation

  • Tatyana Klyachko & Elena Semionova & Galina Tokareva, 2019. "Success and Failure of School Students: Parental Expectations and Teachers' Perceptions," Voprosy obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 4, pages 71-92.
    • Handle: RePEc:nos:voprob:2019:i:4:p:71-92
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://vo.hse.ru/data/2019/12/21/1525907016/04%20Klyachko.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eric A. Hanushek & Marc Piopiunik & Simon Wiederhold, 2019. "The Value of Smarter Teachers: International Evidence on Teacher Cognitive Skills and Student Performance," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 54(4), pages 857-899.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Montse Gomendio, 2023. "The Level of Skills in Spain: How to Solve the Puzzle using International Surveys," Studies on the Spanish Economy eee2023-35, FEDEA.
    2. Cordero, Jose M. & Gil-Izquierdo, María, 2018. "The effect of teaching strategies on student achievement: An analysis using TALIS-PISA-link," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 1313-1331.
    3. Ralph Hippe & Luisa De Sousa Lobo Borges de Araujo & Patricia Dinis Mota da Costa, 2016. "Equity in Education in Europe," JRC Research Reports JRC104595, Joint Research Centre.
    4. Di Tommaso, Maria Laura & Contini, Dalit & De Rosa, Dalila & Ferrara, Francesca & Piazzalunga, Daniela & Robutti, Ornella, 2024. "Tackling the gender gap in mathematics with active learning methodologies," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    5. John P. Martin, 2018. "Skills for the 21st Century: Findings and Policy Lessons from the OECD Survey of Adult Skills," Working Papers 201803, Geary Institute, University College Dublin.
    6. Jan Bietenbeck & Marc Piopiunik & Simon Wiederhold, 2018. "Africa’s Skill Tragedy: Does Teachers’ Lack of Knowledge Lead to Low Student Performance?," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 53(3), pages 553-578.
    7. Ritzen, Jo, 2020. "Public universities, in search of enhanced funding," MERIT Working Papers 2020-020, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    8. Ruhose, Jens & Schwerdt, Guido, 2016. "Does early educational tracking increase migrant-native achievement gaps? Differences-in-differences evidence across countries," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 134-154.
    9. Herbst, Chris M., 2024. "The Declining Relative Quality of the Child Care Workforce," IZA Discussion Papers 17351, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    10. Paredes Chervellini, Luciano & Ritzen, Jo, 2021. "Simulating the impact of a raise in education salaries on economic growth in Peru," MERIT Working Papers 2021-029, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    11. Torberg Falch & Bjarne Strøm, 2024. "Teacher demand, teacher education, and teacher shortages. A new data set 1861-2024 for Norway," Working Paper Series 19924, Department of Economics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
    12. Torberg Falch & Bjarne Strøm, 2021. "Mobility of novice teachers," Working Paper Series 19121, Department of Economics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
    13. Hanushek, Eric A., 2021. "Addressing cross-national generalizability in educational impact evaluation," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    14. O. D. Marcenaro-Gutierrez & M. Luque & L. A. Lopez-Agudo, 2016. "Balancing Teachers’ Math Satisfaction and Other Indicators of the Education System’s Performance," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 129(3), pages 1319-1348, December.
    15. Biedermann, Matthias & Häner, Melanie & Schaltegger, Christoph A., 2024. "More is not always better. Effect of educational expenditures on education quality and social mobility in Switzerland," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    16. Tianyang Liu & Baozhong Su & Jingjing Wang & Scott Rozelle, 2024. "Can a Teacher Salary Increase Promote Students' Educational Performance?," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 32(4), pages 114-145, July.
    17. Ludger Woessmann, 2016. "The Importance of School Systems: Evidence from International Differences in Student Achievement," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 30(3), pages 3-32, Summer.
    18. David K. Evans & Fei Yuan & Deon Filmer, 2020. "Are Teachers in Africa Poorly Paid? Evidence from 15 Countries," Working Papers 538, Center for Global Development.
    19. Клячко Т. Л. & Семионова Е. А. & Токарева Г. С., 2019. "Успешность И Неуспешность Школьников: Ожидания Родителей, Оценка Учителей," Вопросы образования // Educational Studies Moscow, National Research University Higher School of Economics, issue 4, pages 71-92.
    20. Atsushi Inoue & Ryuichi Tanaka, 2023. "Do teachers’ college majors affect students’ academic achievement in the sciences? A cross-subfields analysis with student-teacher fixed effects," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(5), pages 617-631, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nos:voprob:2019:i:4:p:71-92. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marta Morozova (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://vo.hse.ru/en/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.