IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nea/journl/y2025i66p177-194.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is profit important in the era of ESG?

Author

Listed:
  • Buklemishev, O.

    (Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia)

  • Danilov, Yu.

    (Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia)

Abstract

The article discusses changes in the basic market economy paradigm related to the role of profit in the expansion and competitive selection of enterprises. The "ESGrevolution" affects the behavior of enterprises that allocate available financial resources to produce both private and public goods. Ceteris paribus, an increase of spending in the latter direction reduces the firm's potential for short-term expansion and, accordingly, the long-term competitive advantage. Due to the effects of information asymmetry and other market failures, this loss can be only partially compensated by using preferential terms of the responsible financing instruments available mainly for the financialized enterprises. To produce such a reimbursement, an idea of integrated profit tax deductions for sustainable development projects is put forward. This approach could play a catalytic role in spreading responsible behavior practices and optimizing the regulatory burden in the field of ESG, and reduce the distortions of the key reproduction role of profits in general.

Suggested Citation

  • Buklemishev, O. & Danilov, Yu., 2025. "Is profit important in the era of ESG?," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 66(1), pages 177-194.
  • Handle: RePEc:nea:journl:y:2025:i:66:p:177-194
    DOI: 10.31737/22212264_2025_1_177-194
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.econorus.org/repec/journl/2025-66-177-194r.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31737/22212264_2025_1_177-194?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dirk Schoenmaker & Willem Schramade, 2019. "Investing for long-term value creation," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(4), pages 356-377, October.
    2. Hart, Oliver & Zingales, Luigi, 2017. "Companies Should Maximize Shareholder Welfare Not Market Value," Journal of Law, Finance, and Accounting, now publishers, vol. 2(2), pages 247-275, November.
    3. Fama, Eugene F & Jensen, Michael C, 1983. "Agency Problems and Residual Claims," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 26(2), pages 327-349, June.
    4. Michael C. Jensen, 2010. "Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 22(1), pages 32-42, January.
    5. Hart, Oliver & Zingales, Luigi, 2022. "The New Corporate Governance," CEPR Discussion Papers 17276, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    6. ., 2001. "Corporate Governance in Islamic Banking," Chapters, in: Islamic Banking, chapter 7, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. Gunnar Friede & Timo Busch & Alexander Bassen, 2015. "ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(4), pages 210-233, October.
    8. Dan Daugaard & Ashley Ding, 2022. "Global Drivers for ESG Performance: The Body of Knowledge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, February.
    9. Hart, Oliver D. & Zingales, Luigi, 2022. "The New Corporate Governance," Working Papers 317, The University of Chicago Booth School of Business, George J. Stigler Center for the Study of the Economy and the State.
    10. Florian Berg & Julian F Kölbel & Roberto Rigobon, 2022. "Aggregate Confusion: The Divergence of ESG Ratings [Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: theory and empirical evidence]," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 26(6), pages 1315-1344.
    11. Tirole, Jean, 2001. "Corporate Governance," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 69(1), pages 1-35, January.
    12. Mariantonietta Intonti & Laura Serlenga & Giovanni Ferri & Matteo De Leonardis & Giuseppe Starace, 2023. "The “Greenium” in Green Bonds: How Did It Change with COVID-19?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, March.
    13. Hart, Oliver D. & Zingales, Luigi, 2017. "Companies Should Maximize Shareholder Welfare Not Market Value," Working Papers 267, The University of Chicago Booth School of Business, George J. Stigler Center for the Study of the Economy and the State.
    14. Georgios Zairis & Panagiotis Liargovas & Nikolaos Apostolopoulos, 2024. "Sustainable Finance and ESG Importance: A Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-14, March.
    15. Yu. A. Danilov, 2021. "The concept of sustainable finance and the prospects for its implementation in Russia," Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP Voprosy Ekonomiki, issue 5.
    16. Malcolm Baker & Daniel Bergstresser & George Serafeim & Jeffrey Wurgler, 2022. "The Pricing and Ownership of US Green Bonds," Annual Review of Financial Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 14(1), pages 415-437, November.
    17. Ananth Madhavan & Aleksander Sobczyk & Andrew Ang, 2021. "Toward ESG Alpha: Analyzing ESG Exposures through a Factor Lens," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 77(1), pages 69-88, January.
    18. Eugene F. Fama, 2021. "Contract costs, stakeholder capitalism, and ESG," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 27(2), pages 189-195, March.
    19. Vesa Pursiainen & Hanwen Sun & Yue Xiang, 2023. "Competitive Pressure and ESG," Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 23-69, Swiss Finance Institute.
    20. Michael Magill & Martine Quinzii & Jean‐Charles Rochet, 2015. "A Theory of the Stakeholder Corporation," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 83(5), pages 1685-1725, September.
    21. Boubaker, Sabri & Cellier, Alexis & Manita, Riadh & Saeed, Asif, 2020. "Does corporate social responsibility reduce financial distress risk?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 835-851.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schoenmaker, Dirk & Schramade, Willem, 2024. "Shareholder primacy or stakeholder governance?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 69(PB).
    2. Bejan, Camelia, 2024. "On the shareholders versus stakeholders debate," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 68-88.
    3. Qian, Binsheng & Poshakwale, Sunil & Tan, Yusen, 2024. "‘E’ of ESG and firm performance: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PB).
    4. Marshall, Andrew & Rao, Sandeep & Roy, Partha P. & Thapa, Chandra, 2022. "Mandatory corporate social responsibility and foreign institutional investor preferences," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    5. Chowdhury, Rajib & Doukas, John A. & Park, Jong Chool, 2021. "Stakeholder orientation and the value of cash holdings: Evidence from a natural experiment," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    6. Romec, Arthur, 2023. "Stakeholder orientation and managerial incentives: Evidence from a natural experiment," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    7. Dariya Mykhayliv & Klaus G. Zauner, 2025. "On stakeholder theory and corporate investment under financial frictions," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 803-810, January.
    8. Allen, Franklin & Barbalau, Adelina, 2024. "Security design: A review," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    9. Moisson, Paul-Henri, 2024. "Social Responsibility, Consequentialism and Public Policy," TSE Working Papers 24-1521, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    10. Charlotte Ostergaard & Ibolya Schindele & Bent Vale, 2016. "Social Capital and the Viability of Stakeholder-Oriented Firms: Evidence from Savings Banks," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 20(5), pages 1673-1718.
    11. Ballester, Laura & González-Urteaga, Ana & Shen, Long, 2024. "Green bond issuance and credit risk: International evidence," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    12. Fafaliou, Irene & Giaka, Maria & Konstantios, Dimitrios & Polemis, Michael, 2022. "Firms’ ESG reputational risk and market longevity: A firm-level analysis for the United States," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 161-177.
    13. Champagne, Claudia & Coggins, Frank & Sodjahin, Amos, 2022. "Can extra-financial ratings serve as an indicator of ESG risk?," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    14. Nicos A. Scordis & Yoshihiko Suzawa & Astrid Zwick & Lucia Ruckner, 2014. "Principles for Sustainable Insurance: Risk Management and Value," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 17(2), pages 265-276, September.
    15. Kevin T. Jackson, 2023. "Questioning Shareholder Welfare Maximization: A Virtue Theoretic Perspective," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 255-286, December.
    16. Karca D. Aral & Erasmo Giambona & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2023. "Managerial flexibility, capacity investment, and inventory levels," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(12), pages 3890-3907, December.
    17. Hans B. Christensen & Luzi Hail & Christian Leuz, 2021. "Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 1176-1248, September.
    18. Amitava Roy, 2014. "Corporate Governance and Firm Performance: An Exploratory Analysis of Indian Listed Companies," Jindal Journal of Business Research, , vol. 3(1-2), pages 93-120, June.
    19. Yang, Ruoke, 2022. "What do we learn from ratings about corporate social responsibility? New evidence of uninformative ratings," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    20. Issam Samiri & Yunus Aksoy & Arup Daripa, 2024. "Firm Ownership and the Macroeconomics of Incentive Leakages," National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) Discussion Papers 563, National Institute of Economic and Social Research.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    profit; competitiveness; reproduction; sustainable development goals; ESG; stakeholder corporation; sustainable finance; financialization; tax deductions; generalization of results;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D21 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Firm Behavior: Theory
    • G30 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - General
    • H23 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Externalities; Redistributive Effects; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies
    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nea:journl:y:2025:i:66:p:177-194. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alexey Tcharykov (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nearuea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.