IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nea/journl/y2025i66p177-194.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is profit important in the era of ESG?

Author

Listed:
  • Buklemishev, O.

    (Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia)

  • Danilov, Yu.

    (Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia)

Abstract

The article discusses changes in the basic market economy paradigm related to the role of profit in the expansion and competitive selection of enterprises. The "ESGrevolution" affects the behavior of enterprises that allocate available financial resources to produce both private and public goods. Ceteris paribus, an increase of spending in the latter direction reduces the firm's potential for short-term expansion and, accordingly, the long-term competitive advantage. Due to the effects of information asymmetry and other market failures, this loss can be only partially compensated by using preferential terms of the responsible financing instruments available mainly for the financialized enterprises. To produce such a reimbursement, an idea of integrated profit tax deductions for sustainable development projects is put forward. This approach could play a catalytic role in spreading responsible behavior practices and optimizing the regulatory burden in the field of ESG, and reduce the distortions of the key reproduction role of profits in general.

Suggested Citation

  • Buklemishev, O. & Danilov, Yu., 2025. "Is profit important in the era of ESG?," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 66(1), pages 177-194.
    • Handle: RePEc:nea:journl:y:2025:i:66:p:177-194
    DOI: 10.31737/22212264_2025_1_177-194
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.econorus.org/repec/journl/2025-66-177-194r.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31737/22212264_2025_1_177-194?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dirk Schoenmaker & Willem Schramade, 2019. "Investing for long-term value creation," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(4), pages 356-377, October.
    2. Fama, Eugene F & Jensen, Michael C, 1983. "Agency Problems and Residual Claims," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 26(2), pages 327-349, June.
    3. Michael C. Jensen, 2010. "Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 22(1), pages 32-42, January.
    4. ., 2001. "Corporate Governance in Islamic Banking," Chapters, in: Islamic Banking, chapter 7, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Mariantonietta Intonti & Laura Serlenga & Giovanni Ferri & Matteo De Leonardis & Giuseppe Starace, 2023. "The “Greenium” in Green Bonds: How Did It Change with COVID-19?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, March.
    6. Georgios Zairis & Panagiotis Liargovas & Nikolaos Apostolopoulos, 2024. "Sustainable Finance and ESG Importance: A Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-14, March.
    7. Malcolm Baker & Daniel Bergstresser & George Serafeim & Jeffrey Wurgler, 2022. "The Pricing and Ownership of US Green Bonds," Annual Review of Financial Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 14(1), pages 415-437, November.
    8. Tirole, Jean, 2001. "Corporate Governance," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 69(1), pages 1-35, January.
    9. Vesa Pursiainen & Hanwen Sun & Yue Xiang, 2023. "Competitive Pressure and ESG," Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 23-69, Swiss Finance Institute.
    10. Boubaker, Sabri & Cellier, Alexis & Manita, Riadh & Saeed, Asif, 2020. "Does corporate social responsibility reduce financial distress risk?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 835-851.
    11. Hart, Oliver & Zingales, Luigi, 2017. "Companies Should Maximize Shareholder Welfare Not Market Value," Journal of Law, Finance, and Accounting, now publishers, vol. 2(2), pages 247-275, November.
    12. Florian Berg & Julian F Kölbel & Roberto Rigobon, 2022. "Aggregate Confusion: The Divergence of ESG Ratings [Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: theory and empirical evidence]," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 26(6), pages 1315-1344.
    13. Ananth Madhavan & Aleksander Sobczyk & Andrew Ang, 2021. "Toward ESG Alpha: Analyzing ESG Exposures through a Factor Lens," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 77(1), pages 69-88, January.
    14. Gunnar Friede & Timo Busch & Alexander Bassen, 2015. "ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(4), pages 210-233, October.
    15. Hart, Oliver D. & Zingales, Luigi, 2022. "The New Corporate Governance," Working Papers 317, The University of Chicago Booth School of Business, George J. Stigler Center for the Study of the Economy and the State.
    16. Hart, Oliver D. & Zingales, Luigi, 2017. "Companies Should Maximize Shareholder Welfare Not Market Value," Working Papers 267, The University of Chicago Booth School of Business, George J. Stigler Center for the Study of the Economy and the State.
    17. Oliver D. Hart & Luigi Zingales, 2022. "The New Corporate Governance," NBER Working Papers 29975, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    18. Michael Magill & Martine Quinzii & Jean‐Charles Rochet, 2015. "A Theory of the Stakeholder Corporation," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 83(5), pages 1685-1725, September.
    19. Dan Daugaard & Ashley Ding, 2022. "Global Drivers for ESG Performance: The Body of Knowledge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, February.
    20. Yu. A. Danilov, 2021. "The concept of sustainable finance and the prospects for its implementation in Russia," Voprosy Ekonomiki, NP Voprosy Ekonomiki, issue 5.
    21. Eugene F. Fama, 2021. "Contract costs, stakeholder capitalism, and ESG," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 27(2), pages 189-195, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schoenmaker, Dirk & Schramade, Willem, 2024. "Shareholder primacy or stakeholder governance?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 69(PB).
    2. Bejan, Camelia, 2024. "On the shareholders versus stakeholders debate," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 68-88.
    3. Marshall, Andrew & Rao, Sandeep & Roy, Partha P. & Thapa, Chandra, 2022. "Mandatory corporate social responsibility and foreign institutional investor preferences," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    4. Qian, Binsheng & Poshakwale, Sunil & Tan, Yusen, 2024. "‘E’ of ESG and firm performance: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 96(PB).
    5. Chowdhury, Rajib & Doukas, John A. & Park, Jong Chool, 2021. "Stakeholder orientation and the value of cash holdings: Evidence from a natural experiment," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    6. Romec, Arthur, 2023. "Stakeholder orientation and managerial incentives: Evidence from a natural experiment," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    7. Dariya Mykhayliv & Klaus G. Zauner, 2025. "On stakeholder theory and corporate investment under financial frictions," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 803-810, January.
    8. Allen, Franklin & Barbalau, Adelina, 2024. "Security design: A review," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    9. Moisson, Paul-Henri, 2024. "Social Responsibility, Consequentialism and Public Policy," TSE Working Papers 24-1521, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    10. Ballester, Laura & González-Urteaga, Ana & Shen, Long, 2024. "Green bond issuance and credit risk: International evidence," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    11. Champagne, Claudia & Coggins, Frank & Sodjahin, Amos, 2022. "Can extra-financial ratings serve as an indicator of ESG risk?," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    12. Nicos A. Scordis & Yoshihiko Suzawa & Astrid Zwick & Lucia Ruckner, 2014. "Principles for Sustainable Insurance: Risk Management and Value," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 17(2), pages 265-276, September.
    13. Hans B. Christensen & Luzi Hail & Christian Leuz, 2021. "Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: economic analysis and literature review," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 1176-1248, September.
    14. Anagnostopoulou, Seraina C. & Tsekrekos, Andrianos E. & Voulgaris, Georgios, 2021. "Accounting conservatism and corporate social responsibility," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(4).
    15. Ormazabal, Gaizka, 2018. "The Role of Stakeholders in Corporate Governance: A View from Accounting Research," CEPR Discussion Papers 12775, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    16. Min-Jung Kang & Seul-Gi Oh & Ho-Young Lee, 2022. "The Association between Outside Directors’ Compensation and ESG Performance: Evidence from Korean Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-22, September.
    17. Hernández-Atienza, Fernando & Rodríguez-Sanz, Juan Antonio & Tejerina-Gaite, Fernando, 2024. "The pathways of board diversity in European contexts: Exploring the influence of director types on firm performance," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 72(PA).
    18. KONISHI, Masaru & 小西, 大 & SAITO, Junyu, 2023. "Do firms consider stakeholder interests as a means to create shareholder value or as the ultimate goal? Evidence from Japanese dividend policies," Working Paper Series G-1-27, Hitotsubashi University Center for Financial Research.
    19. Shira Cohen & Igor Kadach & Gaizka Ormazabal & Stefan Reichelstein, 2023. "Executive Compensation Tied to ESG Performance: International Evidence," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(3), pages 805-853, June.
    20. Ni, Xiaoran & Song, Wei & Yao, Jiaquan, 2020. "Stakeholder orientation and corporate payout policy: Insights from state legal shocks," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    profit; competitiveness; reproduction; sustainable development goals; ESG; stakeholder corporation; sustainable finance; financialization; tax deductions; generalization of results;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D21 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Firm Behavior: Theory
    • G30 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - General
    • H23 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Externalities; Redistributive Effects; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies
    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nea:journl:y:2025:i:66:p:177-194. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alexey Tcharykov (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nearuea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.