IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i7p5631-d1105305.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The “Greenium” in Green Bonds: How Did It Change with COVID-19?

Author

Listed:
  • Mariantonietta Intonti

    (Dipartimento di Economia e Finanza, Università degli Studi di Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy)

  • Laura Serlenga

    (Dipartimento di Economia e Finanza, Università degli Studi di Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy)

  • Giovanni Ferri

    (Dipartimento di Giurisprudenza, Economia, Politica e Lingue Moderne, Università LUMSA, 00193 Roma, Italy)

  • Matteo De Leonardis

    (Dipartimento di Management Finanza e Tecnologia, Università LUM “Giuseppe Degennaro”, 70010 Casamassima, Italy)

  • Giuseppe Starace

    (Dipartimento di Management Finanza e Tecnologia, Università LUM “Giuseppe Degennaro”, 70010 Casamassima, Italy)

Abstract

This paper focuses on the study of the “greenium”, i.e., the premium on Green Bonds (GBs) vs. Traditional Bonds (TBs) whereby investors accept lower yields of GBs vs. TBs, which is caused by the important difference between them with reference to their contribution to the green transition, specifically paying attention to the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on it. The conjecture of this paper is that the negative shock of rates due to the pandemic crisis has increased the greenium, as it has also increased the interest in projects of the green transition. In addition, a hypothesis is made that the risk of breaking the green promises might be higher for corporations than for governments and, hence, that the greenium would be lower for corporate GBs than for government GBs. Finally, the possibility that the post-pandemic changes of the greenium might vary depending on individual GBs’ liquidity is considered. The empirical analyses provide support for the first two hypotheses but not for the third one.

Suggested Citation

  • Mariantonietta Intonti & Laura Serlenga & Giovanni Ferri & Matteo De Leonardis & Giuseppe Starace, 2023. "The “Greenium” in Green Bonds: How Did It Change with COVID-19?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:7:p:5631-:d:1105305
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/7/5631/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/7/5631/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Malcolm Baker & Daniel Bergstresser & George Serafeim & Jeffrey Wurgler, 2018. "Financing the Response to Climate Change: The Pricing and Ownership of U.S. Green Bonds," NBER Working Papers 25194, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Fatica, Serena & Panzica, Roberto, 2021. "Sustainable investing in times of crisis: evidence from bond holdings and the COVID-19 pandemic," Working Papers 2021-07, Joint Research Centre, European Commission.
    3. Alessandro Beber & Michael W. Brandt & Kenneth A. Kavajecz, 2009. "Flight-to-Quality or Flight-to-Liquidity? Evidence from the Euro-Area Bond Market," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 22(3), pages 925-957, March.
    4. Dick-Nielsen, Jens & Feldhütter, Peter & Lando, David, 2012. "Corporate bond liquidity before and after the onset of the subprime crisis," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(3), pages 471-492.
    5. Hinsche, Isabelle Cathérine, 2021. "A greenium for the next generation EU green bonds: Analysis of a potential green bond premium and its drivers," CFS Working Paper Series 663, Center for Financial Studies (CFS).
    6. Torsten Ehlers & Frank Packer, 2017. "Green bond finance and certification," BIS Quarterly Review, Bank for International Settlements, September.
    7. repec:oup:rfinst:v:21:y:2017:i:4:p:1355-1401. is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Zerbib, Olivier David, 2019. "The effect of pro-environmental preferences on bond prices: Evidence from green bonds," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 39-60.
    9. Koziol, Christian & Proelss, Juliane & Roßmann, Philipp & Schweizer, Denis, 2022. "The price of being green," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    10. Kingsley Y. L. Fong & Craig W. Holden & Charles A. Trzcinka, 2017. "What Are the Best Liquidity Proxies for Global Research?," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 21(4), pages 1355-1401.
    11. Fatica, Serena & Panzica, Roberto & Rancan, Michela, 2021. "The pricing of green bonds: Are financial institutions special?," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    12. Long Chen & David A. Lesmond & Jason Wei, 2007. "Corporate Yield Spreads and Bond Liquidity," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 62(1), pages 119-149, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mariantonietta Intonti & Laura Serlenga & Giovanni Ferri & Matteo De Leonardis, 2022. "The Green Bond Premium: A Comparative Analysis," CERBE Working Papers wpC40, CERBE Center for Relationship Banking and Economics.
    2. Zerbib, Olivier David, 2019. "The effect of pro-environmental preferences on bond prices: Evidence from green bonds," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 39-60.
    3. Hinsche, Isabelle Cathérine, 2021. "A greenium for the next generation EU green bonds: Analysis of a potential green bond premium and its drivers," CFS Working Paper Series 663, Center for Financial Studies (CFS).
    4. K. Thomas Liaw, 2020. "Survey of Green Bond Pricing and Investment Performance," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-12, August.
    5. Larcker, David F. & Watts, Edward M., 2020. "Where's the greenium?," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(2).
    6. Yoshihiro Zenno & Kentaka Aruga, 2023. "Investigating Factors Affecting Institutional Investors’ Green Bond Investments: Cases for Beijing and Shenzhen," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, March.
    7. Danilo Liberati & Giuseppe Marinelli, 2022. "Everything you always wanted to know about green bonds (but were afraid to ask)," IFC Bulletins chapters, in: Bank for International Settlements (ed.), Statistics for Sustainable Finance, volume 56, Bank for International Settlements.
    8. Karel Janda & Binyi Zhang, 2021. "Attractiveness of Chinese Bonds Financing Climate and Environmental Projects," FFA Working Papers 4.007, Prague University of Economics and Business, revised 26 Apr 2022.
    9. Dorfleitner, Gregor & Eckberg, Jens & Utz, Sebastian, 2023. "Greenness ratings and green bond liquidity," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 55(PA).
    10. Ricardo Gimeno & Fernando Sols, 2020. "Incorporating sustainability factors into asset management," Revista de Estabilidad Financiera, Banco de España, issue Autumn.
    11. Ricardo Gimeno & Fernando Sols, 2020. "Incorporating sustainability factors into asset management," Financial Stability Review, Banco de España, issue Autumn.
    12. Suk Hyun & Donghyun Park & Shu Tian, 2023. "The price of frequent issuance: the value of information in the green bond market," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 56(5), pages 3041-3063, October.
    13. Ricardo Gimeno & Fernando Sols, 2020. "Incorporating sustainability factors into asset management," Financial Stability Review, Banco de España, issue NOV.
    14. Simeth, Nagihan, 2022. "The value of external reviews in the secondary green bond market," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 46(PA).
    15. Alessandro Moro, 2021. "Can capital controls promote green investments in developing countries?," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 1348, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    16. Lebelle, Martin & Lajili Jarjir, Souad & Sassi, Syrine, 2022. "The effect of issuance documentation disclosure and readability on liquidity: Evidence from green bonds," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    17. Diana Pop & Caroline Marie-Jeanne & Régis Dumoulin, 2023. "Socialium or the Financial Price of Social Responsibility [« Socialium » ou le prix financier de la responsabilité sociale]," Post-Print hal-04120305, HAL.
    18. Kirschenmann Karolin, 2022. "The EU Taxonomy’s (Potential) Effects on the Banking Sector and Bank Lending to Firms," The Economists' Voice, De Gruyter, vol. 19(2), pages 245-253, December.
    19. Emre Arat & Britta Hachenberg & Florian Kiesel & Dirk Schiereck, 2023. "Greenium, credit rating, and the COVID-19 pandemic," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(7), pages 547-557, December.
    20. Maria Jua Bachelet & Leonardo Becchetti & Stefano Manfredonia, 2019. "The Green Bonds Premium Puzzle: The Role of Issuer Characteristics and Third-Party Verification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-22, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:7:p:5631-:d:1105305. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.