IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nea/journl/y2024i64p251-257.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The formation of domestic value-added networks

Author

Listed:
  • Polterovich, V.

    (CEMI RAS, Moscow, Russia
    MSE MSU, Moscow, Russia)

Abstract

The concept of the VAN-consortium is introduced. It is a consortium, distinguished by two specific features. Firstly, it includes a group of enterprises that carry out successive stages of production of one or more products. Secondly, the tasks of a VAN-consortium include the development and implementation of projects for the creation and/or implementation of new technologies intended for use in its network, including by enterprises from various sectors of the national economy. Therefore, it should incorporate organizations capable of performing such tasks, possibly involving temporary participants - research and project institutes. Members of the consortium retain their independence. Coordination of their activities is carried out by a coordination council consisting of their representatives. Real examples show that consortia of this type are capable of ensuring the formation and functioning of domestic value-added networks (VANs). Such networks are necessary for the technological development of a country under severe sanctions pressure. The creation of VAN-consortia could become an important element of indicative plans, and government support would contribute to the development of the VAN-consortium as a collaborative institution.

Suggested Citation

  • Polterovich, V., 2024. "The formation of domestic value-added networks," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 64(3), pages 251-257.
    • Handle: RePEc:nea:journl:y:2024:i:64:p:251-257
    DOI: 10.31737/22212264_2024_3_251-257
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.econorus.org/repec/journl/2024-64-251-257r.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31737/22212264_2024_3_251-257?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anne Haugen Gausdal & Helge Svare & Guido Möllering, 2016. "Why don’t all high-trust networks achieve strong network benefits? A case-based exploration of cooperation in Norwegian SME networks," Journal of Trust Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(2), pages 194-212, July.
    2. Fabio Fonti & Massimo Maoret & Robert Whitbred, 2017. "Free-riding in multi-party alliances: The role of perceived alliance effectiveness and peers' collaboration in a research consortium," Post-Print hal-02006440, HAL.
    3. David Crowe & Łukasz Rawdanowicz, 2023. "Risks and opportunities of reshaping global value chains," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 1762, OECD Publishing.
    4. Weiping Jiang & Shanqing Tang, 2023. "The Cooperation Establishment Mechanism of EPC Project Consortium in Context of China: Form the Perspective of Trust," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-19, January.
    5. Polterovich, V., 2022. "Once again about where to go: Toward a development strategy in isolation from the West," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 55(3), pages 238-244.
    6. Kallappan Thangamuthu Parthiban & Cruzmuthu Cinthia Fernandaz & Rajadorai Jude Sudhagar & Iyapillai Sekar & Subramani Umesh Kanna & Periyasamy Rajendran & Pachanoor Subbian Devanand & Subramaniam Venn, 2021. "Industrial Agroforestry—A Sustainable Value Chain Innovation through a Consortium Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-14, June.
    7. Soufiane Kherrazi, 2023. "Exploring Taxonomies and Governance Challenges of Sponsored R&D Consortia: Evidence from the EU Framework Program," Journal of Innovation Economics, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(2), pages 217-249.
    8. Fabio Fonti & Massimo Maoret & Robert Whitbred, 2017. "Free-riding in multi-party alliances: The role of perceived alliance effectiveness and peers' collaboration in a research consortium," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(2), pages 363-383, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stienstra, Miranda, 2020. "The determinants and performance implications of alliance partner acquisition," Other publications TiSEM 7fdee0c2-d4d2-4f5b-95e3-2, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    2. Hafezi, Maryam & Zhao, Xuan & Zolfagharinia, Hossein, 2023. "Together we stand? Co-opetition for the development of green products," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(3), pages 1417-1438.
    3. Diego Zunino & Fernando F. Suarez & Stine Grodal, 2019. "Familiarity, Creativity, and the Adoption of Category Labels in Technology Industries," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(1), pages 169-190, February.
    4. Gerges-Yammine, Rand & Ter Wal, Anne L.J., 2023. "Firm exit from open multiparty alliances: The role of social influence, uncertainty, and interfirm imitation in collective technology development," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(4).
    5. De Silva, Muthu & Rossi, Federica & Yip, Nick K.T. & Rosli, Ainurul, 2021. "Does affective evaluation matter for the success of university-industry collaborations? A sentiment analysis of university-industry collaborative project reports," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    6. Brinster, Leonhard & Tykvová, Tereza, 2021. "Connected VCs and strategic alliances: Evidence from biotech companies," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    7. Krijkamp, Annefleur R. & Knoben, Joris & Oerlemans, Leon A.G. & Leenders, Roger T.A.J., 2021. "An ace in the hole: The effects of (in)accurately observed structural holes on organizational reputation positions in whole networks," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 703-713.
    8. Arakpogun, Emmanuel Ogiemwonyi & Elsahn, Ziad & Nyuur, Richard B. & Olan, Femi, 2020. "Threading the needle of the digital divide in Africa: The barriers and mitigations of infrastructure sharing," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    9. Peng Wang & Yongyuan Ma & Zhongquan Hu, 2018. "Unraveling the effect of alliance experience on alliance formation and alliance governance structure: A meta-analytic approach," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 43(4), pages 653-671, November.
    10. Helge Svare & Anne Haugen Gausdal, 2017. "Dynamic capabilities and network benefits," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 13(1), pages 117-146.
    11. Ilkova, Ivelina & Lebastard, Laura & Serafini, Roberta, 2024. "Geopolitics and trade in the euro area and the United States: de-risking of import supplies?," Occasional Paper Series 359, European Central Bank.
    12. Polterovich, Victor, 2024. "Формирование Отечественных Сетей Добавленной Стоимости [Formation of domestic value-added networks]," MPRA Paper 121661, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. E. B. Lenchuk, 2023. "Technological Modernization as a Basis for the Anti-Sanctions Policy," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 464-472, August.
    14. Zemtsov, S. & Voloshinskaya, A., 2024. "Russian regional resilience under sanctions," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 64(3), pages 54-83.
    15. Gelton Fernando de Morais & Jenyffer da Silva Gomes Santos & Daniela Han & Luiz Octávio Ramos Filho & Marcelo Gomes Barroca Xavier & Leonardo Schimidt & Hugo Thiago de Souza & Fernanda Ticianelli de C, 2023. "Agricultural Machinery Adequacy for Handling the Mombaça Grass Biomass in Agroforestry Systems," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-28, July.
    16. Peter Ping Li, 2017. "The time for transition: Future trust research," Journal of Trust Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 1-14, January.
    17. Xiaotian Yang, 2022. "Coopetition for innovation in R&D consortia: Moderating roles of size disparity and formal interaction," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 79-102, March.
    18. Dovev Lavie & Randi Lunnan & Binh Minh T. Truong, 2022. "How does a partner's acquisition affect the value of the firm's alliance with that partner?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(9), pages 1897-1926, September.
    19. Korpas, Edyta & De Beule, Filip & Verwaal, Ernst, 2021. "Dependence and uncertainty in broker strategies of research intermediaries," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 34-45.
    20. Samovoleva, Svetlana, 2023. "Окна Возможностей И Ловушки При Переходе К Собственным Инновациям [Transition toward own innovation: the windows of opportunity and traps]," MPRA Paper 119314, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    consortium; sanctions; trust; technological development; indicative plan;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B52 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches - - - Historical; Institutional; Evolutionary; Modern Monetary Theory;
    • D02 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Institutions: Design, Formation, Operations, and Impact
    • O12 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Microeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
    • O25 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - Industrial Policy
    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes
    • P21 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist and Transition Economies - - - Planning, Coordination, and Reform

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nea:journl:y:2024:i:64:p:251-257. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alexey Tcharykov (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nearuea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.