IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nbb/ecrart/y2017mjuneiip79-92.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital currencies : Threats and opportunities for monetary policy

Author

Listed:
  • A. Stevens

    (National Bank of Belgium)

Abstract

The article on the social balance sheet centres on two main themes : changes in the composition of the volume of labour on the one hand, and the level and movement in the wage gap between men and women on the other hand. Between 2000 and 2014, the volume of labour measured in FTEs increased by around 193 000 units, or 12.3 % over 14 years. The number of firms analysed increased from 69 939 to 85 572 over the same period. The volume of labour expanded considerably in health and social work (following the increase in the number of balance sheets submitted), but also in other services, and more moderately in trade and transport. Conversely, it contracted in industry. There were also substantial changes in the structure of the volume of labour broken down by type of workers. The contribution of personnel employed as clerical staff rose sharply while that of manual workers declined. Part-time workers accounted for a larger proportion of the labour force in 2014. Finally, women have become a major driving force in activity, while the volume of labour represented by male workers has diminished. The study of the results for just under 2 000 firms submitting a full balance sheet shows that, in 2014, the cost of an hour’s labour for male workforce was 13.9 % higher, on average, than for female workers. However, the situation is far from uniform as regards both the aggregate wage gap per branch and the results recorded at the level of the firms themselves. Analysis by branch of activity shows that the wage gap is larger than average in trade and transport and in other services, while it is more moderate in industry and slightly negative in health and social work. At the business level, average hourly costs are higher for men than for women in 69 % of firms. The wage gap is 15 % or larger in one in four firms. The movement in the wage gap between 2012 and 2014 was measured on the basis of a constant population of just over a thousand firms. The gap narrowed in 57 % of firms, while it increased moderately in 23.5 % of companies. However, there was only little change in the dispersion of the wage gap observations between those two years. The firms in this constant population recording a positive wage gap still represented a large share of the total in 2014, even if they were proportionately fewer than two years ago.

Suggested Citation

  • A. Stevens, 2017. "Digital currencies : Threats and opportunities for monetary policy," Economic Review, National Bank of Belgium, issue i, pages 79-92, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:nbb:ecrart:y:2017:m:june:i:i:p:79-92
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nbb.be/en/articles/digital-currencies-threats-and-opportunities-monetary-policy
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Buiter, Willem H., 2009. "Negative nominal interest rates: Three ways to overcome the zero lower bound," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 213-238, December.
    2. Eric T. Swanson & John C. Williams, 2014. "Measuring the Effect of the Zero Lower Bound on Medium- and Longer-Term Interest Rates," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(10), pages 3154-3185, October.
    3. Wilko Bolt & Maarten R.C. Van Oordt, 2020. "On the Value of Virtual Currencies," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 52(4), pages 835-862, June.
    4. Hess Chung & Jean‐Philippe Laforte & David Reifschneider & John C. Williams, 2012. "Have We Underestimated the Likelihood and Severity of Zero Lower Bound Events?," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 44(s1), pages 47-82, February.
    5. Wilko Bolt & Maarten R.C. Van Oordt, 2020. "On the Value of Virtual Currencies," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 52(4), pages 835-862, June.
    6. Laurence M. Ball, 2014. "The Case for a Long-Run Inflation Target of Four Percent," IMF Working Papers 2014/092, International Monetary Fund.
    7. Willem H. Buiter & Nikolaos Panigirtzoglou, 2003. "Overcoming the zero bound on nominal interest rates with negative interest on currency: gesell's solution," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 113(490), pages 723-746, October.
    8. Ali, Robleh & Barrdear, John & Clews, Roger & Southgate, James, 2014. "The economics of digital currencies," Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, Bank of England, vol. 54(3), pages 276-286.
    9. Lukasz Rachel & Thomas Smith, 2015. "Secular Drivers of the Global Real Interest Rate," Discussion Papers 1605, Centre for Macroeconomics (CFM).
    10. Goodhart, C A E, 1987. "Why Do Banks Need a Central Bank?," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 39(1), pages 75-89, March.
    11. Barrdear, John & Kumhof, Michael, 2016. "The macroeconomics of central bank issued digital currencies," Bank of England working papers 605, Bank of England.
    12. Marvin Goodfriend, 2000. "Overcoming the zero bound on interest rate policy," Conference Series ; [Proceedings], Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, pages 1007-1057.
    13. Douglas W. Diamond & Raghuram G. Rajan, 2001. "Liquidity Risk, Liquidity Creation, and Financial Fragility: A Theory of Banking," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 109(2), pages 287-327, April.
    14. Kenneth S. Rogoff, 2016. "The Curse of Cash," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, number 10798.
    15. Ben Fung & Hanna Halaburda, 2016. "Central Bank Digital Currencies: A Framework for Assessing Why and How," Discussion Papers 16-22, Bank of Canada.
    16. Charles A. E. Goodhart & Meinhard A. Jensen, 2015. "A Commentary on Patrizio Lainà's 'Proposals for Full-Reserve Banking: A Historical Survey from David Ricardo to Martin Wolf'," Economic Thought, World Economics Association, vol. 4(2), pages 1-20, September.
    17. Stephanie Lo & J. Christina Wang, 2014. "Bitcoin as money?," Current Policy Perspectives 14-4, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
    18. Ronnie Phillips, 1992. "The 'Chicago Plan' and New Deal Banking Reform," Economics Working Paper Archive wp_76, Levy Economics Institute.
    19. Max Raskin & David Yermack, 2016. "Digital Currencies, Decentralized Ledgers, and the Future of Central Banking," NBER Working Papers 22238, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Grodecka-Messi, Anna & Zhang, Xin, 2023. "Private bank money vs central bank money: A historical lesson for CBDC introduction," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    2. Beltrametti, Luca & Pittaluga, Giovanni Battista, 2023. "Monetary Policy Implications of Stablecoins and CBDCs," Economia Internazionale / International Economics, Camera di Commercio Industria Artigianato Agricoltura di Genova, vol. 76(3), pages 453-478.
    3. Alexandra Mitschke, 2021. "Central Bank Digital Currencies and Monetary Policy Effectiveness in the Euro Area," Working Papers Dissertations 74, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
    4. Noelia Camara & Enestor Dos Santos & Francisco Grippa & Javier Sebastian & Fernando Soto & Cristina Varela, 2018. "Monedas digitales emitidas por bancos centrales: una valoracion de su adopcion en LatAm," Working Papers 18/05, BBVA Bank, Economic Research Department.
    5. Young Sik Kim & Ohik Kwon, 2019. "Central Bank Digital Currency and Financial Stability," Working Papers 2019-6, Economic Research Institute, Bank of Korea.
    6. Dr. Romain Baeriswyl & Dr. Samuel Reynard & Alexandre Swoboda, 2021. "Retail CBDC purposes and risk transfers to the central bank," Working Papers 2021-19, Swiss National Bank.
    7. Paolo Fegatelli, 2019. "Central bank digital currencies: The case of universal central bank reserves," BCL working papers 130, Central Bank of Luxembourg.
    8. Walter Engert & Ben Fung, 2017. "Central Bank Digital Currency: Motivations and Implications," Discussion Papers 17-16, Bank of Canada.
    9. Nicole Jonker, 2018. "What drives bitcoin adoption by retailers," DNB Working Papers 585, Netherlands Central Bank, Research Department.
    10. Gaston Giordana & Paolo Guarda, 2019. "Why do social networks introduce virtual currencies?," BCL working papers 132, Central Bank of Luxembourg.
    11. Young Sik Kim & Ohik Kwon, 2023. "Central Bank Digital Currency, Credit Supply, and Financial Stability," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 55(1), pages 297-321, February.
    12. DIMITRIU, Mihail, 2017. "Currency, Financial System And Virtual Space. A Microeconomic Approach," Journal of Financial and Monetary Economics, Centre of Financial and Monetary Research "Victor Slavescu", vol. 4(1), pages 261-265.
    13. Arto Kovanen, 2019. "Competing With Bitcoin - Some Policy Considerations for Issuing Digitalized Legal Tenders," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, July.
    14. Aiste Juskaite & Sigitas Siaudinis & Tomas Reichenbachas, 2019. "CBDC – in a whirlpool of discussion," Bank of Lithuania Occasional Paper Series 29, Bank of Lithuania.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Agur, Itai & Ari, Anil & Dell’Ariccia, Giovanni, 2022. "Designing central bank digital currencies," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 62-79.
    2. Paolo Fegatelli, 2019. "Central bank digital currencies: The case of universal central bank reserves," BCL working papers 130, Central Bank of Luxembourg.
    3. Nasir, Muhammad Ali, 2021. "Zero Lower Bound and negative interest rates: Choices for monetary policy in the UK," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 200-229.
    4. Dirk Niepelt, 2020. "Reserves for All? Central Bank Digital Currency, Deposits, and Their (Non)-Equivalence," International Journal of Central Banking, International Journal of Central Banking, vol. 16(3), pages 211-238, June.
    5. Michael D. Bordo & Andrew T. Levin, 2017. "Central Bank Digital Currency and the Future of Monetary Policy," NBER Working Papers 23711, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Itai Agur & Mario Bergara & Michael D. Bordo & Alessandra Cillo & Walter Engert & Santiago Fernandez de Lis & Ben S.C. Fung & Ernest Gnan & Andrew T. Levin & Dirk Niepelt & Ruth Judson & Donato Mascia, 2018. "Do We Need Central Bank Digital Currency? Economics, Technology and Institutions," SUERF Studies, SUERF - The European Money and Finance Forum, number 2018/2 edited by Ernest Gnan and Donato Masciandaro, May.
    7. van Holle, Frederiek, 2017. "Essays in empirical finance and monetary policy," Other publications TiSEM 30d11a4b-7bc9-4c81-ad24-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    8. Mr. Tanai Khiaonarong & David Humphrey, 2019. "Cash Use Across Countries and the Demand for Central Bank Digital Currency," IMF Working Papers 2019/046, International Monetary Fund.
    9. Belke, Ansgar & Beretta, Edoardo, 2019. "From cash to central bank digital currencies and cryptocurrencies: A balancing act between modernity and monetary stability," Ruhr Economic Papers 816, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    10. Emanuele Borgonovo & Stefano Caselli & Alessandra Cillo & Donato Masciandaro & Giovanno Rabitti, 2018. "Cryptocurrencies, central bank digital cash, traditional money: does privacy matter?," BAFFI CAREFIN Working Papers 1895, BAFFI CAREFIN, Centre for Applied Research on International Markets Banking Finance and Regulation, Universita' Bocconi, Milano, Italy.
    11. Stefano Neri & Giuseppe Ferrero, 2017. "Monetary policy in a low interest rate environment," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 392, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    12. DIMITRIU, Mihail, 2017. "Currency, Financial System And Virtual Space. A Microeconomic Approach," Journal of Financial and Monetary Economics, Centre of Financial and Monetary Research "Victor Slavescu", vol. 4(1), pages 261-265.
    13. Donato Masciandaro, 2018. "Central Bank Digital Cash and Cryptocurrencies: Insights from a New Baumol–Friedman Demand for Money," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 51(4), pages 540-550, December.
    14. Makoto Saito, 2021. "Central Bank Cryptocurrencies in a Competitive Equilibrium Environment: Can Strong Money Demand Survive in the Digital Age?," Advances in Japanese Business and Economics, in: Strong Money Demand in Financing War and Peace, pages 161-189, Springer.
    15. Hossein Nabilou, 2020. "Testing the waters of the Rubicon: the European Central Bank and central bank digital currencies," Journal of Banking Regulation, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(4), pages 299-314, December.
    16. Sigitas Siaudinis, 2019. "Digital Currencies and Central Banking: A Sense of Déjà Vu," Bank of Lithuania Occasional Paper Series 26, Bank of Lithuania.
    17. Ansgar Belke & Edoardo Beretta, 2020. "From cash to central bank digital currencies and cryptocurrencies: a balancing act between modernity and monetary stability," Journal of Economic Studies, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 47(4), pages 911-938, June.
    18. Nizar, Muhammad Afdi, 2018. "Kontroversi Mata Uang Digital [The Controversies of Digital Currency]," MPRA Paper 97940, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Michael D. Bordo & Andrew T. Levin, 2019. "Digital Cash: Principles & Practical Steps," NBER Working Papers 25455, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Anil Savio Kavuri & Alistair Milne, 2019. "FinTech and the future of financial services: What are the research gaps?," CAMA Working Papers 2019-18, Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbb:ecrart:y:2017:m:june:i:i:p:79-92. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bnbgvbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.