IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nbb/ecrart/y2017mjuneiip79-92.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital currencies : Threats and opportunities for monetary policy

Author

Listed:
  • A. Stevens

    (National Bank of Belgium)

Abstract

The article on the social balance sheet centres on two main themes : changes in the composition of the volume of labour on the one hand, and the level and movement in the wage gap between men and women on the other hand. Between 2000 and 2014, the volume of labour measured in FTEs increased by around 193 000 units, or 12.3 % over 14 years. The number of firms analysed increased from 69 939 to 85 572 over the same period. The volume of labour expanded considerably in health and social work (following the increase in the number of balance sheets submitted), but also in other services, and more moderately in trade and transport. Conversely, it contracted in industry. There were also substantial changes in the structure of the volume of labour broken down by type of workers. The contribution of personnel employed as clerical staff rose sharply while that of manual workers declined. Part-time workers accounted for a larger proportion of the labour force in 2014. Finally, women have become a major driving force in activity, while the volume of labour represented by male workers has diminished. The study of the results for just under 2 000 firms submitting a full balance sheet shows that, in 2014, the cost of an hour’s labour for male workforce was 13.9 % higher, on average, than for female workers. However, the situation is far from uniform as regards both the aggregate wage gap per branch and the results recorded at the level of the firms themselves. Analysis by branch of activity shows that the wage gap is larger than average in trade and transport and in other services, while it is more moderate in industry and slightly negative in health and social work. At the business level, average hourly costs are higher for men than for women in 69 % of firms. The wage gap is 15 % or larger in one in four firms. The movement in the wage gap between 2012 and 2014 was measured on the basis of a constant population of just over a thousand firms. The gap narrowed in 57 % of firms, while it increased moderately in 23.5 % of companies. However, there was only little change in the dispersion of the wage gap observations between those two years. The firms in this constant population recording a positive wage gap still represented a large share of the total in 2014, even if they were proportionately fewer than two years ago.

Suggested Citation

  • A. Stevens, 2017. "Digital currencies : Threats and opportunities for monetary policy," Economic Review, National Bank of Belgium, issue i, pages 79-92, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:nbb:ecrart:y:2017:m:june:i:i:p:79-92
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nbb.be/doc/oc/repec/ecrart/ecorevi2017_h5.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Buiter, Willem H., 2009. "Negative nominal interest rates: Three ways to overcome the zero lower bound," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 213-238, December.
    2. Wilko Bolt & Maarten van Oordt, 2016. "On the value of virtual currencies," DNB Working Papers 521, Netherlands Central Bank, Research Department.
    3. Hess Chung & Jean‐Philippe Laforte & David Reifschneider & John C. Williams, 2012. "Have We Underestimated the Likelihood and Severity of Zero Lower Bound Events?," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 44, pages 47-82, February.
    4. Willem H. Buiter & Nikolaos Panigirtzoglou, 2003. "Overcoming the zero bound on nominal interest rates with negative interest on currency: gesell's solution," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 113(490), pages 723-746, October.
    5. Ali, Robleh & Barrdear, John & Clews, Roger & Southgate, James, 2014. "The economics of digital currencies," Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, Bank of England, vol. 54(3), pages 276-286.
    6. Lukasz Rachel & Thomas Smith, 2015. "Secular Drivers of the Global Real Interest Rate," Discussion Papers 1605, Centre for Macroeconomics (CFM).
    7. Barrdear, John & Kumhof, Michael, 2016. "The macroeconomics of central bank issued digital currencies," Bank of England working papers 605, Bank of England.
    8. Marvin Goodfriend, 2000. "Overcoming the zero bound on interest rate policy," Conference Series ; [Proceedings], Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, pages 1007-1057.
    9. Douglas W. Diamond & Raghuram G. Rajan, 2001. "Liquidity Risk, Liquidity Creation, and Financial Fragility: A Theory of Banking," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 109(2), pages 287-327, April.
    10. Kenneth S. Rogoff, 2016. "The Curse of Cash," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, number 10798.
    11. Charles A. E. Goodhart & Meinhard A. Jensen, 2015. "A Commentary on Patrizio Lainà's 'Proposals for Full-Reserve Banking: A Historical Survey from David Ricardo to Martin Wolf'," Economic Thought, World Economics Association, vol. 4(2), pages 1-20, September.
    12. Lo, Stephanie & Wang, J. Christina, 2014. "Bitcoin as money?," Current Policy Perspectives 14-4, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
    13. Ronnie Phillips, 1992. "The 'Chicago Plan' and New Deal Banking Reform," Economics Working Paper Archive wp_76, Levy Economics Institute.
    14. Max Raskin & David Yermack, 2016. "Digital Currencies, Decentralized Ledgers, and the Future of Central Banking," NBER Working Papers 22238, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nicole Jonker, 2018. "What drives bitcoin adoption by retailers," DNB Working Papers 585, Netherlands Central Bank, Research Department.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbb:ecrart:y:2017:m:june:i:i:p:79-92. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/bnbgvbe.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.