IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/nat/nathum/v9y2025i6d10.1038_s41562-025-02153-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differences in psychologists’ cognitive traits are associated with scientific divides

Author

Listed:
  • Justin Sulik

    (LMU Munich)

  • Nakwon Rim

    (University of Chicago)

  • Elizabeth Pontikes

    (University of California-Davis)

  • James Evans

    (University of Chicago
    Santa Fe Institute
    Google Research)

  • Gary Lupyan

    (University of Wisconsin-Madison)

Abstract

Scientific research is often characterized by schools of thought. We investigate whether these divisions are associated with differences in researchers’ cognitive traits such as tolerance for ambiguity. These differences may guide researchers to prefer different problems, tackle identical problems in different ways, and even reach different conclusions when studying the same problems in the same way. We surveyed 7,973 researchers in psychological sciences and investigated links between what they research, their stances on open questions in the field, and their cognitive traits and dispositions. Our results show that researchers’ stances on scientific questions are associated with what they research and with their cognitive traits. Further, these associations are detectable in their publication histories. These findings support the idea that divisions in scientific fields reflect differences in the researchers themselves, hinting that some divisions may be more difficult to bridge than suggested by a traditional view of data-driven scientific consensus.

Suggested Citation

  • Justin Sulik & Nakwon Rim & Elizabeth Pontikes & James Evans & Gary Lupyan, 2025. "Differences in psychologists’ cognitive traits are associated with scientific divides," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 9(6), pages 1147-1161, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:9:y:2025:i:6:d:10.1038_s41562-025-02153-1
    DOI: 10.1038/s41562-025-02153-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-025-02153-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1038/s41562-025-02153-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Justin Sulik & Ophelia Deroy & Guillaume Dezecache & Martha Newson & Yi Zhao & Marwa El Zein & Bahar Tunçgenç, 2021. "Facing the pandemic with trust in science," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-10, December.
    2. repec:plo:pone00:0197265 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Tatyana Deryugina & Olga Shurchkov & Jenna Stearns, 2021. "COVID-19 Disruptions Disproportionately Affect Female Academics," AEA Papers and Proceedings, American Economic Association, vol. 111, pages 164-168, May.
    4. Molly Lewis & Gary Lupyan, 2020. "Gender stereotypes are reflected in the distributional structure of 25 languages," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 4(10), pages 1021-1028, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Magdalena Gil & Constanza Hurtado-Acuna & Máximo Quiero-Bastías & Marigen Narea & Alejandra Caqueo-Urízar, 2023. "Unequal effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on researchers: evidence from Chile and Colombia," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, December.
    2. Nicolás Ajzenman & Bruno Ferman & Sant’Anna Pedro C., 2023. "Discrimination in the Formation of Academic Networks: A Field Experiment on #EconTwitter," Working Papers 235, Red Nacional de Investigadores en Economía (RedNIE).
    3. Ayllón, Sara, 2022. "Online teaching and gender bias," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    4. repec:osf:socarx:ep5bx_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Constantin Bürgi & Klaus Wohlrabe, 2022. "The influence of Covid-19 on publications in economics: bibliometric evidence from five working paper series," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(9), pages 5175-5189, September.
    6. Davies, Benjamin, 2022. "Gender sorting among economists: Evidence from the NBER," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    7. Clotilde Napp, 2023. "Gender stereotypes embedded in natural language are stronger in more economically developed and individualistic countries," Post-Print hal-04316389, HAL.
    8. Adrián Mateo-Orcajada & Lucía Abenza-Cano & Raquel Vaquero-Cristóbal & Sonia M. Martínez-Castro & Alejandro Leiva-Arcas & Ana María Gallardo-Guerrero & Antonio Sánchez-Pato, 2021. "Gender Stereotypes among Teachers and Trainers Working with Adolescents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-10, December.
    9. Nakajima, Kazuki & Liu, Ruodan & Shudo, Kazuyuki & Masuda, Naoki, 2023. "Quantifying gender imbalance in East Asian academia: Research career and citation practice," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 17(4).
    10. Giovanni Abramo & Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo & Ida Mele, 2022. "Impact of Covid-19 on research output by gender across countries," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(12), pages 6811-6826, December.
    11. Fischer, Kai & Reade, J. James & Schmal, W. Benedikt, 2022. "What cannot be cured must be endured: The long-lasting effect of a COVID-19 infection on workplace productivity," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    12. van Loon, Austin, 2022. "Three Families of Automated Text Analysis," SocArXiv htnej, Center for Open Science.
    13. Kwon, Eunrang & Yun, Jinhyuk & Kang, Jeong-han, 2023. "The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on gendered research productivity and its correlates," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1).
    14. Biondi, Beatrice & Barrett, Christopher B. & Mazzocchi, Mario & Ando, Amy & Harvey, David & Mallory, Mindy, 2021. "Journal submissions, review and editorial decision patterns during initial COVID-19 restrictions," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    15. Davies, Benjamin, 2022. "Sex-based sorting among economists: Evidence from the NBER," SocArXiv zeb7a, Center for Open Science.
    16. Seulkee Heo & Alisha Yee Chan & Pedro Diaz Peralta & Lan Jin & Claudia Ribeiro Pereira Nunes & Michelle L. Bell, 2022. "Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on scientists’ productivity in science, technology, engineering, mathematics (STEM), and medicine fields," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-11, December.
    17. Elena Fumagalli & Candelaria Belén Krick & Marina Belén Dolmatzian & Julieta Edith Del Negro & Joaquin Navajas, 2023. "Partisanship predicts COVID-19 vaccine brand preference: the case of Argentina," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    18. Hanqi Li & Xiaojun Ding & Mingyu Li, 2024. "A cross-cultural comparison of Chinese and Western philosophical practice: exploring new paths for philosophical healing and social harmony," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-21, December.
    19. Brad M. Barber & Wei Jiang & Adair Morse & Manju Puri & Heather Tookes & Ingrid M. Werner, 2021. "What Explains Differences in Finance Research Productivity during the Pandemic?," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 76(4), pages 1655-1697, August.
    20. Sarah Thébaud & Charlotte Hoppen & Jennifer David & Eileen Boris, 2024. "Understanding Gender Disparities in Caregiving, Stress, and Perceptions of Institutional Support among Faculty during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, March.
    21. Anders Brostrom & Cornelia Lawson & Mabel Sanchez Barrioluengo, 2024. "Are scientists perceived as credible experts?," MIOIR Working Paper Series 2024-06, The Manchester Institute of Innovation Research (MIoIR), The University of Manchester.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:nathum:v:9:y:2025:i:6:d:10.1038_s41562-025-02153-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.