Author
Listed:
- Sudhanshu Pandey
(California Institute of Technology)
- Frédéric Chevallier
(Université Paris-Saclay)
- Christian Rödenbeck
(Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry)
- Brendan Byrne
(California Institute of Technology)
- Abhishek Chatterjee
(California Institute of Technology)
- Junjie Liu
(California Institute of Technology
California Institute of Technology)
- Christian Frankenberg
(California Institute of Technology
California Institute of Technology)
Abstract
The Global Carbon Project (GCP) compiles an updated global carbon budget each year, synthesizing state‑of‑the‑art estimates of anthropogenic CO2 emissions, land and ocean sinks, and the atmospheric CO2 growth rate. The residual between these terms, referred to as the global carbon budget imbalance, reflects the aggregate inaccuracies of the individual component estimates. Growth rates derived from marine boundary layer (MBL) surface flask mixing ratio observations are assumed to be highly accurate. Hence, land and ocean sink estimates from process models are viewed as the primary source of the imbalance. Here we show that substantial discrepancies arise when marine boundary layer growth rate estimates are used to represent the whole atmosphere. Correcting for this discrepancy using atmospheric flux inversion estimates reduces the 0.76 petagrams of carbon per year (PgC yr−1) root-mean-square (RMS) imbalance (from the 2023 GCP report) by up to 25%. Further investigation into the imbalance metric between the 2017 and 2023 GCP reports shows a reduction in imbalance resulting from updates to each carbon budget component, leading to a 16% overall reduction. These reductions provide quantitative evidence of improvements in process models and inventory emission estimates, driven by enhanced forcing data and the inclusion of new carbon cycle processes. Overall, we report a 37% reduction in the root-mean-square imbalance, from 0.91 to 0.57 PgC yr−1, between the 2017 and 2023 GCP reports by combining process model and inventory improvements with atmospheric growth rate corrections. Our findings indicate that land and ocean process models are more accurate than previously believed and that the scientific understanding of Earth’s carbon cycle is improving.
Suggested Citation
Sudhanshu Pandey & Frédéric Chevallier & Christian Rödenbeck & Brendan Byrne & Abhishek Chatterjee & Junjie Liu & Christian Frankenberg, 2025.
"Reduction in Earth’s carbon budget imbalance,"
Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-8, December.
Handle:
RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-61588-2
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-61588-2
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nat:natcom:v:16:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1038_s41467-025-61588-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.nature.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.