IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mth/ber888/v12y2022i1p4461.html

Green Economy in the Post-pandemic Period: A Framework for Organizational Stakeholder Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Helen Kavvadia

Abstract

In the current geo-economic landscape, the satisfaction of green economy goals and post-pandemic economic recovery dominate public discussion. Although climate change consequences are increasingly evidenced, economic actors devastated by the economic impact of the COVID-19 crisis are tempted to prioritize some "less green" activity, as demonstrated at the fall 2021 G20 summit and the United Nations COP26 summit in Rome and Glasgow, respectively. This tendency is reflected in the indecision of economic actors in setting future goals, partly as a result of diverging stakeholder forces applied to organizations. Although stakeholders' views are often not publicly known, they shape organizational policies. To understand the stance of organizations on the dilemma of "climate versus recovery," it is therefore important to decipher the stance of their stakeholders concerning the two alternative priorities. This article provides a framework for analyzing stakeholders' positions on this predicament based on how public or private their goals, consultations, and deliberations are. The validity of the proposed framework is tested in a case study approach through the examination of stakeholder preferences shaping the European Investment Bank's (EIB) decision-making. The European Union's (EU) bank has been chosen as a case study because it announced its "pivot" to become the first public international climate bank in 2019, and formed an important part of the Union’s first response to the COVID-19 pandemic resilience and stimulus initiatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Helen Kavvadia, 2022. "Green Economy in the Post-pandemic Period: A Framework for Organizational Stakeholder Analysis," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 12(1), pages 4461-4461, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:mth:ber888:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:4461
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ber/article/download/19450/15200
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ber/article/view/19450
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luigi Zingales, 2000. "In Search of New Foundations," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 55(4), pages 1623-1653, August.
    2. Farida Saleem & Yingying Zhang-Zhang & Muhammad Imran Malik & Alawiya Allui, 2020. "Revisiting Stakeholder Theory and Environmentalism: Evidence from an Emerging Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-20, October.
    3. Orts, Eric W. & Strudler, Alan, 2002. "The Ethical and Environmental Limits of Stakeholder Theory," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(2), pages 215-233, April.
    4. Thomas Marois, 2022. "A Dynamic Theory of Public Banks (and Why it Matters)," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(2), pages 356-371, April.
    5. Luis Perez-Batres & Jonathan Doh & Van Miller & Michael Pisani, 2012. "Stakeholder Pressures as Determinants of CSR Strategic Choice: Why do Firms Choose Symbolic Versus Substantive Self-Regulatory Codes of Conduct?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 110(2), pages 157-172, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ali Rıza Güngen, 2023. "New Multilateral Development Banks and Green Lending: Approaching Scalar Complexities in the Global South," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 54(2), pages 251-279, March.
    2. Becker, Sascha O. & Hvide, Hans K., "undated". "Do entrepreneurs matter?," Economic Research Papers 270547, University of Warwick - Department of Economics.
    3. Ourvashi Bissoon, 2018. "Corporate social responsibility in Mauritius: an analysis of annual reports of multinational hotel groups," Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Pascal Louvet & Ollivier Taramasco, 2004. "Gouvernement d’entreprise:un modèle de répartition de la valeur créée entre dirigeant et actionnaire," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 7(1), pages 81-116, March.
    5. Kim, Jongwook & Mahoney, Joseph T., 2008. "A Strategic Theory of the Firm as a Nexus of Incomplete Contracts: A Property Rights Approach," Working Papers 08-0108, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    6. Mario Vaupel & David Bendig & Denise Fischer-Kreer & Malte Brettel, 2023. "The Role of Share Repurchases for Firms’ Social and Environmental Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 183(2), pages 401-428, March.
    7. Smith, Stephen D. & Wall, Larry D., 2010. "Debt, hedging and human capital," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 6(2), pages 55-63, June.
    8. Lahoucine Outolba & Abdelhaq Lahfidi, 2021. "Success factors of very small businesses in regulated context: Case of Moroccan insurance brokers," Post-Print hal-03363167, HAL.
    9. Olga Kuzmina, 2023. "Employment Flexibility and Capital Structure: Evidence from a Natural Experiment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(9), pages 4992-5017, September.
    10. Gorman, Gary G. & Rosa, Peter J. & Faseruk, Alex, 2005. "Institutional lending to knowledge-based businesses," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 20(6), pages 793-819, November.
    11. Heugens, P.P.M.A.R. & Kaptein, S.P. & van Oosterhout, J., 2007. "Contracts to Communities: A Processual Model of Organizational Virtue," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2007-023-ORG, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    12. Bazin, Damien, 2009. "What exactly is corporate responsibility towards nature?: Ecological responsibility or management of nature?: A pluri-disciplinary standpoint," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 634-642, January.
    13. Joye Khoo & Adrian (Wai Kong) Cheung, 2023. "Does skilled labor risk matter to suppliers? Evidence from trade credit," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 58(2), pages 423-447, May.
    14. Bouzguenda, Karima, 2018. "Emotional intelligence and financial decision making: Are we talking about a paradigmatic shift or a change in practices?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 273-284.
    15. Kentaro Azuma & Akira Higashida, 2024. "Climate change disclosure and evolving institutional investor salience: Roles of the Principles for Responsible Investment," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 3669-3686, May.
    16. Thi Hong Hoang & Călin Gurău & Amine Lahiani & Thuy-Luu Seran, 2018. "Do crises impact capital structure? A study of French micro-enterprises," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 181-199, January.
    17. Ryoichi Arai & Shinichi Hirota, 2023. "Profitability or Longevity? Cross-Country Variations in Corporate Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-29, May.
    18. Shams, Syed & Bose, Sudipta & Sheikhbahaei, Ali, 2024. "Pricing media sentiment: Evidence from global mergers and acquisitions," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    19. Mitzi Cubilla‐Montilla & Ana‐Belén Nieto‐Librero & Ma Purificación Galindo‐Villardón & Ma Purificación Vicente Galindo & Isabel‐María Garcia‐Sanchez, 2019. "Are cultural values sufficient to improve stakeholder engagement human and labour rights issues?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(4), pages 938-955, July.
    20. Nicos A. Scordis & Yoshihiko Suzawa & Astrid Zwick & Lucia Ruckner, 2014. "Principles for Sustainable Insurance: Risk Management and Value," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 17(2), pages 265-276, September.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mth:ber888:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:4461. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Technical Support Office The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Technical Support Office to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ber .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.