Feasibility of Currency Unions in Asia - An Assessment Using Generalized Purchasing Power Parity -
This paper examined the economic feasibility of forming a regional currency block in Asia, by adopting a generalized purchasing power parity (G-PPP) approach to identify the existence of common trends in real exchange rates among a group of countries. To be specific, we conducted both bilateral and multilateral co-integration estimation on real exchange rates with the samples of 17 Asian countries covering south Asia during the post- 1997-98 crisis period. Our findings are as follows; First, Japan, China and Korea are shown to be little candidate for any optimum currency areas. Second, ASEAN and south Asia, as a group, passed the G-PPP condition. Third, some co-integrating interactions were interestingly found between ASEAN and south Asian members. Our strategic implication emphasizes on the significance of a smaller local subgroup multi-speed strategy toward a long-run goal of currency union in Asia.
Volume (Year): 6 (2010)
Issue (Month): 5 (June)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.mof.go.jp/pri/|
More information through EDIRC
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Enders, Walter & Hurn, Stan, 1994. "Theory and Tests of Generalized Purchasing-Power Parity: Common Trends and Real Exchange Rates in the Pacific Rim," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 2(2), pages 179-190, June.
- Changmo AHN & Hong-Bum KIM & Dongkoo CHANG, 2006. "Is East Asia Fit For An Optimum Currency Area? An Assessment Of The Economic Feasibility Of A Higher Degree Of Monetary Cooperation In East Asia," The Developing Economies, Institute of Developing Economies, vol. 44(3), pages 288-305.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mof:journl:ppr011e. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Policy Research Institute)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.