IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mir/mirbus/v7y2017i8p12-25.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Brand Personality and Students’ Self-Concept on Brand Engagement

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen Banahene

    (chool of Business, Christian Service University College, Ghana,)

Abstract

The objective of this study is to investigate how brand personality and customers self affects brand engagement. This has become necessary because the focus of most research into brands has often neglected how brand personality and customers’ ‘self’ can be harnessed to achieve brand engagement. This study used Aaker’s brand personality, Keller’s brand engagement, and Sprott et. al. self-concept measurement scales. The research methodology includes the following steps: adaptation of the measurement scales to suit the research context, assessment of reliability and validity of dimensions, and test of goodness-of-fit of model. In all 252 valid responses out of 302 questionnaires distributed were used for the study. The research found that brand personality and customers’ ‘self-concept’ have positive effect on brand engagement. Sincerity has negative relationship with brand engagement and self-concept whiles hedonism has negative relationship with self-concept only. Competence, sophistication and excitement dimensions have significant effects on customers’ self-concept and brand engagement. Sincerity and hedonism also have negative effects on self-concept and brand engagement. Competence, sophistication and excitement can be used as differentiate strategy by Private Universities to deal with the growing competition in Ghana. The findings suggest that Private Universities can differentiate themselves by developing brand personality that is competent and exciting, whereby they can successfully engaged their customers. The authors’ investigations also suggest that self-concept can be measured by splitting Sprott et al measurement scale into two (self-congruence and value-congruence). In the same way, brand engagement can be measured by splitting Keller’s measurement scale into two (identification and ambassador dimensions) for theoretical insight. In addition, hedonism has been identified as a useful measure of brand personality but not clear with faith-based Private Universities’ brand personality. Private Universities’ differentiation strategy should be based on competence, sophistication and excitement.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen Banahene, 2017. "The Impact of Brand Personality and Students’ Self-Concept on Brand Engagement," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 7(8), pages 12-25, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:mir:mirbus:v:7:y:2017:i:8:p:12-25
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://thejournalofbusiness.org/index.php/site/article/view/1055/660
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jean-Noël Kapferer & Audrey Azoulay, 2003. "Do brand personality scales really measure brand personality?," Post-Print hal-00781544, HAL.
    2. Caprara, Gian Vittorio & Barbaranelli, Claudio & Guido, Gianluigi, 2001. "Brand personality: How to make the metaphor fit?," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 377-395, June.
    3. Geuens, Maggie & Weijters, Bert & De Wulf, Kristof, 2009. "A new measure of brand personality," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 97-107.
    4. Sandor Czellar & D. Sprott & E. Spangenberg, 2009. "The Importance of a General Measure of Brand Engagement on Market Behavior: Development and Validation of a Scale," Post-Print hal-00458392, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sarah Magnotta, 2017. "A Conceptual Framework of A Customer’s Perception of Retail Salesperson Opportunism," International Journal of Business and Social Research, LAR Center Press, vol. 7(11), pages 1-8, November.
    2. Chathurga Karunanayake & Lalithasiri Gunaruwan, 2019. "Exploring the Inter-play between the Decorative Consumption Dimensions: A deep dive into Conspicuousness and Snobbism through cases of Wristwatches and Houses," International Journal of Business and Social Research, LAR Center Press, vol. 9(5), pages 21-33, May.
    3. Chathurga Karunanayake & Lalithasiri Gunaruwan, 2019. "Exploring the Inter-play between the Decorative Consumption Dimensions: A deep dive into Conspicuousness and Snobbism through cases of Wristwatches and Houses," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 9(5), pages 21-33, May.
    4. Sarah Magnotta, 2017. "A Conceptual Framework of A Customer’s Perception of Retail Salesperson Opportunism," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 7(11), pages 1-8, November.
    5. Olga Nechaeva & Valentina Mazzoli & Raffaele Donvito, 2023. "Brand engagement into self-concept and culture: a literature review for a future research agenda," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 30(5), pages 414-431, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stephen Banahene, 2017. "The Impact of Brand Personality and Students’ Self-Concept on Brand Engagement," International Journal of Business and Social Research, LAR Center Press, vol. 7(8), pages 12-25, August.
    2. Stadler Blank, Ashley & Koenigstorfer, Joerg & Baumgartner, Hans, 2018. "Sport team personality: It’s not all about winning!," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 114-132.
    3. Mohamed Abdalla Elsayed Hassan & Konstantina Zerva & Silvia Aulet, 2021. "Brand Personality Traits of World Heritage Sites: Text Mining Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, May.
    4. Sven Tischer, 2012. "Measuring the impact of critical incidents on brand personality," SFB 649 Discussion Papers SFB649DP2012-064, Sonderforschungsbereich 649, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany.
    5. Jijo George & Victor Anandkumar, 2018. "Dimensions of Product Brand Personality," Vision, , vol. 22(4), pages 377-386, December.
    6. Avis, Mark, 2012. "Brand personality factor based models: A critical review," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 89-96.
    7. Vytautas Dikcius & Eleonora Seimiene & Ramunas Casas, 2018. "Brand Personality Scale: Is It Applicable For A Small Emerging Country?," Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, Faculty of Economics, Vilnius University, vol. 9(2).
    8. Viktoria Maria Radler, 2018. "20 Years of brand personality: a bibliometric review and research agenda," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(4), pages 370-383, July.
    9. Kang, Chanho & Bennett, Gregg & Welty Peachey, Jon, 2016. "Five dimensions of brand personality traits in sport," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 441-453.
    10. Liu, Zhihong & Huang, Songshan (Sam) & Hallak, Rob & Liang, Mingzhu, 2016. "Chinese consumers' brand personality perceptions of tourism real estate firms," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 310-326.
    11. Ranfagni, Silvia & Crawford Camiciottoli, Belinda & Faraoni, Monica, 2016. "How to Measure Alignment in Perceptions of Brand Personality Within Online Communities: Interdisciplinary Insights," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 70-85.
    12. Japutra, Arnold & Molinillo, Sebastian, 2019. "Responsible and active brand personality: On the relationships with brand experience and key relationship constructs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 464-471.
    13. Lara-Rodríguez, Juan Sebastián & Rojas-Contreras, Camilo & Duque Oliva, Edison Jair, 2019. "Discovering emerging research topics for brand personality: A bibliometric analysis," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 261-272.
    14. Theo Lieven, 2017. "How to create reproducible brand personality scales," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(6), pages 592-608, November.
    15. Valette-Florence, Rita & De Barnier, Virginie, 2013. "Towards a micro conception of brand personality: An application for print media brands in a French context," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(7), pages 897-903.
    16. Lombart, Cindy & Louis, Didier, 2012. "Consumer satisfaction and loyalty: Two main consequences of retailer personality," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 644-652.
    17. Salim Moussa, 2021. "Measuring brand personality using emoji: findings from Mokken scaling," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(2), pages 116-132, March.
    18. Sandra Maria Correia Loureiro & Rui Lopes & Hans Ruediger Kaufmann, 2014. "How brand personality, brand identification and service quality influence service brand equity," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(1), pages 1-1, October.
    19. Frauke Sander & Ulrich Föhl & Nadine Walter & Vera Demmer, 2021. "Green or social? An analysis of environmental and social sustainability advertising and its impact on brand personality, credibility and attitude," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(4), pages 429-445, July.
    20. Willems, Kim, 2022. "Brand personality appeal in retailing: Comparing fashion- and grocery retailing," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Brand Personality; Brand Engagement; Hedonism; Self-Concept; Value-Congruence.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing
    • M37 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Advertising
    • D91 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mir:mirbus:v:7:y:2017:i:8:p:12-25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: M Kabir (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csmirus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.