IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/khe/scajes/v3y2017i1p68-72.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of Foreign Direct Investments in Bulgaria and Romania in the Context of Recent Economic Crisis

Author

Listed:
  • Mirel-Daniel Simionescu

    ()

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to select some relevant macroeconomic determinants for foreign direct investment (FDI) in Bulgaria and Romania since the start of the recent economic crisis (2008-2015). Even if the economic recession installed in 2009 in Romania, the foreign investors’ decisions were influenced by the moment of global recession from 2008. A Bayesian approach was proposed, because of the small sample for the variables in analyzed period: FDI as percent of GDP, real GDP rate, unemployment rate, inflation rate, real interest rate, real effective exchange rate index (2010=100) and money demand (M2) as percent of GDP. The estimation results reflected that foreign investors in both countries were attracted by the increase in GDP from a year to another. On the other hand, for Bulgaria the inflation rate was the strongest determinant, indicating the economic stability of the country that made huge efforts in getting one digit inflation rate. In Romania, as expected, the foreign investors were searching for cheap labour force and the increase in unemployment rate attracted more FDI during the crisis period.

Suggested Citation

  • Mirel-Daniel Simionescu, 2017. "Determinants of Foreign Direct Investments in Bulgaria and Romania in the Context of Recent Economic Crisis," Academic Journal of Economic Studies, Faculty of Finance, Banking and Accountancy Bucharest,"Dimitrie Cantemir" Christian University Bucharest, vol. 3(1), pages 68-72, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:khe:scajes:v:3:y:2017:i:1:p:68-72
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ajes.ro/wp-content/uploads/AJES_article_1_89.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.ajes.ro/wp-content/uploads/AJES_article_1_89.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bevan, Alan & Estrin, Saul & Meyer, Klaus, 2004. "Foreign investment location and institutional development in transition economies," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 43-64, February.
    2. Boateng, Agyenim & Hua, Xiuping & Nisar, Shaista & Wu, Junjie, 2015. "Examining the determinants of inward FDI: Evidence from Norway," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 118-127.
    3. Georgescu, George, 2013. "România în perioada post-criză: investiţiile străine directe şi efecte asupra echilibrului financiar extern
      [Romania in post-crisis period: foreign direct investments and effects on external financ
      ," MPRA Paper 46531, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Elina Ribakova & Balázs Horváth & Dimitri G Demekas & Yi Wu, 2005. "Foreign Direct Investment in Southeastern Europe; How (and How Much) Can Policies Help?," IMF Working Papers 05/110, International Monetary Fund.
    5. Maria Birsan & Anuţa Buiga, 2009. "FDI Determinants: Case of Romania," Transition Studies Review, Springer;Central Eastern European University Network (CEEUN), vol. 15(4), pages 726-736, February.
    6. DORNEAN Adina & OANEA Dumitru-Cristian, 2013. "Foreign Direct Investment And Post Crisis Economic Growth. Evidence From European Union," Revista Economica, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 65(6), pages 46-60.
    7. Gheorghe ZAMAN & Zizi Goschin & Valentina Vasile, 2013. "Evolutia Dezechilibrelor Teritoriale Din România În Contextul Crizei Economice," Romanian Journal of Economics, Institute of National Economy, vol. 37(2(46)), pages 20-39, December.
    8. Aristidis Bitzenis, 2006. "Determinants of Greek FDI Outflows in the Balkan Region: The Case of Greek Entrepreneurs in Bulgaria," Eastern European Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(3), pages 79-96, May.
    9. Josef C. Brada & Ali M. Kutan & Taner M. Yigit, 2006. "The effects of transition and political instability on foreign direct investment inflows," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 14(4), pages 649-680, October.
    10. Bruno Merlevede & Koen Schoors, 2009. "Privatisation and foreign direct investment in 10 transition countries," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 143-156.
    11. Cristina DUHNEA & Andreea-Daniela MORARU, 2013. "Investiţiile străine directe şi creşterea economică în România," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania - AGER, vol. 0(Special I), pages 99-108, December.
    12. Gheorghe Zaman, 2012. "Ways Of Improving Foreign Direct Investment (Fdi) Contribution To Romania‘S Sustainable Development," Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, Faculty of Sciences, "1 Decembrie 1918" University, Alba Iulia, vol. 2(14), pages 1-30.
    13. Constantina Kottaridi & Fragkiskos Filippaios & Marina Papanastassiou, 2004. "The Invesment Development Path and the Product Cycle - and Integrated Approach: Empirical Evidence from the new EU member States of CEE," Economics & Management Discussion Papers em-dp2004-03, Henley Business School, Reading University.
    14. Aristidis Bitzenis & Vasileios A. Vlachos, 2010. "International business in an EU candidate: the case of Bulgaria," International Journal of Business Environment, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(4), pages 412-426.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Foreign direct investments; economic crisis; Bayesian model; posterior distribution;

    JEL classification:

    • C51 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Model Construction and Estimation
    • C53 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Forecasting and Prediction Models; Simulation Methods
    • E22 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Investment; Capital; Intangible Capital; Capacity

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:khe:scajes:v:3:y:2017:i:1:p:68-72. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Adi Sava). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/ffucdro.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.