IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/transp/v41y2014i1p193-210.html

New evidence on walking distances to transit stops: identifying redundancies and gaps using variable service areas

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmed El-Geneidy

  • Michael Grimsrud

  • Rania Wasfi

  • Paul Tétreault

  • Julien Surprenant-Legault

Abstract

The percentage of the population being served by a transit system in a metropolitan region is a key system performance measure but depends heavily on the definition of service area. Observing existing service areas can help identify transit system gaps and redundancies. In the public transit industry, buffers at 400 m (0.25 miles) around bus stops and 800 m (0.5 miles) around rail stations are commonly used to identify the area from which most transit users will access the system by foot. This study uses detailed OD survey information to generate service areas that define walking catchment areas around transit services in Montreal, Canada. The 85th percentile walking distance to bus transit service is found to be around 524 m for home-based trip origins, 1,259 m for home-based commuter rail trip origins. Yet these values are found to vary based on our analysis using two statistical models. Walking distances vary based on route and trip qualities (such as type of transit service, transfers and wait time), as well as personal, household, and neighbourhood characteristics. Accordingly, service areas around transit stations should vary based on the service offered and attributes of the people and places served. The generated service areas derived from the generalized statistical model are then used to identify gaps and redundancies at the system and route level using Montreal region as an example. This study can be of benefit to transport engineers and planners trying to maximize transit service coverage in a region while avoiding oversupply of service. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmed El-Geneidy & Michael Grimsrud & Rania Wasfi & Paul Tétreault & Julien Surprenant-Legault, 2014. "New evidence on walking distances to transit stops: identifying redundancies and gaps using variable service areas," Transportation, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 193-210, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:transp:v:41:y:2014:i:1:p:193-210
    DOI: 10.1007/s11116-013-9508-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11116-013-9508-z
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11116-013-9508-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kuby, Michael & Barranda, Anthony & Upchurch, Christopher, 2004. "Factors influencing light-rail station boardings in the United States," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 223-247, March.
    2. Rhonda Daniels & Corinne Mulley, 2013. "Explaining walking distance to public transport: The dominance of public transport supply," The Journal of Transport and Land Use, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, vol. 6(2), pages 5-20.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manout, Ouassim & Bonnel, Patrick & Bouzouina, Louafi, 2018. "Transit accessibility: A new definition of transit connectors," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 88-100.
    2. Lieu, Seung Jae & Akar, Gulsah, 2025. "Understanding rail users' mode choice behavior for first and last mile travel," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    3. Seltzer, Andrew & Wadsworth, Jonathan, 2021. "The Impact of Public Transportation and Commuting on Urban Labour Markets: Evidence from the New Survey of London Life and Labour, 1929-32," IZA Discussion Papers 14628, IZA Network @ LISER.
    4. Jaroslav Burian & Lenka Zajíčková & Igor Ivan & Karel Macků, 2018. "Attitudes and Motivation to Use Public or Individual Transport: A Case Study of Two Middle-Sized Cities," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-25, May.
    5. Guerra, Erick & Cervero, Robert & Tischler, Daniel, 2011. "The Half-Mile Circle: Does It Represent Transit Station Catchments?," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt0d84c2f4, University of California Transportation Center.
    6. Li, Haojie & Zhang, Yingheng & Zhu, Manman & Ren, Gang, 2021. "Impacts of COVID-19 on the usage of public bicycle share in London," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 140-155.
    7. Ahmed Daqrouq & Ardeshir Anjomani, 2019. "Public Transit Ridership and Car-Oriented Cities: The Case of the Dallas Region," Economies, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-17, August.
    8. Cui, Mengying & Yu, Lijie & Nie, Shaoyu & Dai, Zhe & Ge, Ying-en & Levinson, David, 2025. "How do access and spatial dependency shape metro passenger flows," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    9. Ingvardson, Jesper Bláfoss & Nielsen, Otto Anker, 2018. "How urban density, network topology and socio-economy influence public transport ridership: Empirical evidence from 48 European metropolitan areas," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 50-63.
    10. Chai, Hao & Sun, Tieshan & Yin, Tingting, 2025. "Navigating the impact of metro network on bus ridership: Insights into the interdependency between metro and bus systems," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    11. Tu, Wei & Cao, Rui & Yue, Yang & Zhou, Baoding & Li, Qiuping & Li, Qingquan, 2018. "Spatial variations in urban public ridership derived from GPS trajectories and smart card data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 45-57.
    12. Vale, David S. & Viana, Cláudia M. & Pereira, Mauro, 2018. "The extended node-place model at the local scale: Evaluating the integration of land use and transport for Lisbon's subway network," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 282-293.
    13. Samanta, Sutapa & Jha, Manoj K., 2011. "Modeling a rail transit alignment considering different objectives," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 31-45, January.
    14. Marco Trolese & Francesco De Fabiis & Pierluigi Coppola, 2023. "A Walkability Index including Pedestrians’ Perception of Built Environment: The Case Study of Milano Rogoredo Station," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-14, October.
    15. Rodier, Caroline & Shaheen, Susan A. & Blake, Tagan, 2010. "Smart Parking Pilot on the Coaster Commuter Rail Line in San Diego, California," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt06s723rw, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    16. Azad, Mojdeh & Abdelqader, Dua & Taboada, Luis M. & Cherry, Christopher R., 2021. "Walk-to-transit demand estimation methods applied at the parcel level to improve pedestrian infrastructure investment," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    17. Jinjoo Bok & Youngsang Kwon, 2016. "Comparable Measures of Accessibility to Public Transport Using the General Transit Feed Specification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-13, March.
    18. Gao, Jie & Kamphuis, Carlijn B.M. & Helbich, Marco & Ettema, Dick, 2020. "What is ‘neighborhood walkability’? How the built environment differently correlates with walking for different purposes and with walking on weekdays and weekends," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    19. Duncan, Michael & Christensen, Robert K., 2013. "An analysis of park-and-ride provision at light rail stations across the US," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 148-157.
    20. Mulley, Corinne & Tsai, Chi-Hong (Patrick) & Ma, Liang, 2018. "Does residential property price benefit from light rail in Sydney?," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 3-10.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:transp:v:41:y:2014:i:1:p:193-210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.