IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/revdev/v28y2025i2d10.1007_s11147-025-09213-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Not on the same page: comprehensibility of MBS investment prospectuses

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Hibbeln

    (University of Duisburg-Essen)

  • Ralf Metzler

    (University of Duisburg-Essen)

  • Werner Osterkamp

    (University of Duisburg-Essen)

Abstract

We investigate whether originators of mortgage-backed securities lower the comprehensibility of disclosure documents to obfuscate low security quality. Utilizing commonly used complexity proxies primarily based on the volume of the investment prospectus, we find no impact on the performance of European mortgage-backed securities. In contrast, focusing on the comprehensibility as a combination of prospectus volume and text readability, we find that originators obfuscate low security quality by lowering the comprehensibility of the investment prospectus, resulting in greater defaults and lower returns. Investors only partially price these dimensions of complexity: Since the financial crisis, investors have been demanding a significant risk premium for prospectus volume but not for text readability. These findings underscore the importance of assessing comprehensibility of disclosure documents beyond traditional complexity measures and highlight potential implications for originators, investors and regulators in communicating, understanding and mitigating the risks associated with complex financial instruments.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Hibbeln & Ralf Metzler & Werner Osterkamp, 2025. "Not on the same page: comprehensibility of MBS investment prospectuses," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 1-37, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:revdev:v:28:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11147-025-09213-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s11147-025-09213-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11147-025-09213-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11147-025-09213-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Complexity; Disclosure; Prospectus comprehensibility; Security design; Text analysis;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D82 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Asymmetric and Private Information; Mechanism Design
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • G01 - Financial Economics - - General - - - Financial Crises
    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates
    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading
    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors
    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:revdev:v:28:y:2025:i:2:d:10.1007_s11147-025-09213-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.