IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/qmktec/v20y2022i1d10.1007_s11129-022-09249-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Copula-based direct utility models for correlated choice alternatives

Author

Listed:
  • Chul Kim

    (Baruch College)

  • Duk Bin Jun

    (Korea Advanced Institute of Science & Technology)

  • Sungho Park

    (Seoul National University)

Abstract

We propose a general framework of copula-based direct utility models and suggest two approaches (Gaussian and FGM approaches) that can accommodate correlations among unobserved utilities. We investigate how and in which directions the biases in parameter estimates of direct utility models occur when error correlations are ignored. Furthermore, we provide practical guidance to empirical researchers by examining strengths and weaknesses of the two suggested approaches. We find that the Gaussian copula approach is flexible but computationally demanding. On the other hand, the proposed FGM copula approach substantially reduces computational complexity, while fully utilizing the maximum range of correlations that is theoretically attainable by the generalized FGM copulas. We apply the proposed approaches to various contexts including grocery scanner panel, experimental, and conjoint datasets and demonstrate that overlooking the correlations may bias managerial metrics and result in suboptimal decisions (e.g., optimal package configuration, monetary equivalents of attribute levels).

Suggested Citation

  • Chul Kim & Duk Bin Jun & Sungho Park, 2022. "Copula-based direct utility models for correlated choice alternatives," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 69-99, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:qmktec:v:20:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s11129-022-09249-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s11129-022-09249-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11129-022-09249-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11129-022-09249-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:qmktec:v:20:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s11129-022-09249-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.