Author
Listed:
- Heather M. Rackin
(Louisiana State University)
- Christina M. Gibson-Davis
(Duke University)
- Courtney E. Williams
(The University of Texas at Austin)
- Dustin Hughes
(Western Washington University)
- Seunghwan Yoo
(Louisiana State University)
Abstract
Motivated by political-based differences in pandemic perceptions, this study analyzed whether Republican- and Democratic-leaning counties exhibited differential fertility shifts, leading to a partisan fertility gap. As COVID-19 emerged, the political right dismissed the threat of the virus, while the political left emphasized it as a major crisis. These contrasting views may have led to diverging fertility responses between those living in Democratic- and Republican-leaning areas. Using county-level data from Florida, difference-in-difference models predicted quarterly change in fertility rates between 2018 and 2022. Models estimated the partisan fertility gap (e.g., Republican-Democratic difference in fertility rate changes relative to before the pandemic) as a function of 2020 Trump vote share. The partisan fertility gap widened during the pandemic’s early months, as fertility in Republican-leaning counties declined less than in Democratic-leaning counties. This gap was only observed for White women and was robust to controlling on time-varying potential confounders (unemployment rate and racial composition changes). The partisan gap was short-lived, however. Results suggest that politically-charged contexts where would-be-parents lived may have affected pandemic-induced fertility shocks and demonstrates the need to understand fertility changes in the context of the broader political environment—a vital endeavor given record-low fertility and unprecedented political polarization in the United States.
Suggested Citation
Heather M. Rackin & Christina M. Gibson-Davis & Courtney E. Williams & Dustin Hughes & Seunghwan Yoo, 2025.
"Partisan Divergence in Fertility Change Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Florida,"
Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 44(5), pages 1-38, October.
Handle:
RePEc:kap:poprpr:v:44:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s11113-025-09972-0
DOI: 10.1007/s11113-025-09972-0
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:poprpr:v:44:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s11113-025-09972-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.