IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/netspa/v6y2006i3p253-265.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mixed Route Strategies for the Risk-Averse Shipment of Hazardous Materials

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Bell

Abstract

Previous work on the risk-averse routing of hazardous materials has focussed on ways of finding the safest route between a pair of points. For repeated shipments where the arc incident probabilities are unknown, it is shown that the safest strategy is in general to use a mix of routes. Starting with a simple two-route example, it is shown that exposure can be significantly reduced by sharing shipments between routes. In order to determine the safest set of routes and the safest share of traffic between these routes, a minmax problem is formulated. The properties of the optimality conditions are explored. A simple solution heuristic based on a shortest path algorithm and the method of successive averages is proposed. Connections to game theory provide useful insights into the nature of the solution. Copyright Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2006

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Bell, 2006. "Mixed Route Strategies for the Risk-Averse Shipment of Hazardous Materials," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 6(3), pages 253-265, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:netspa:v:6:y:2006:i:3:p:253-265
    DOI: 10.1007/s11067-006-9283-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11067-006-9283-x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11067-006-9283-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bell, Michael G. H. & Cassir, Chris, 2002. "Risk-averse user equilibrium traffic assignment: an application of game theory," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 671-681, September.
    2. Punnen, Abraham P., 1991. "A linear time algorithm for the maximum capacity path problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 53(3), pages 402-404, August.
    3. Erhan Erkut & Armann Ingolfsson, 2000. "Catastrophe Avoidance Models for Hazardous Materials Route Planning," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 165-179, May.
    4. Honghua Jin & Rajan Batta & Mark H. Karwan, 1996. "On the Analysis of Two New Models for Transporting Hazardous Materials," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 44(5), pages 710-723, October.
    5. Hanif D. Sherali & Laora D. Brizendine & Theodore S. Glickman & Shivaram Subramanian, 1997. "Low Probability---High Consequence Considerations in Routing Hazardous Material Shipments," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(3), pages 237-251, August.
    6. Linda K. Nozick & George F. List & Mark A. Turnquist, 1997. "Integrated Routing and Scheduling in Hazardous Materials Transportation," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(3), pages 200-215, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nima Haghighi & S. Kiavash Fayyaz & Xiaoyue Cathy Liu & Tony H. Grubesic & Ran Wei, 2018. "A Multi-Scenario Probabilistic Simulation Approach for Critical Transportation Network Risk Assessment," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 181-203, March.
    2. Yu Nie & Xing Wu & Tito Homem-de-Mello, 2012. "Optimal Path Problems with Second-Order Stochastic Dominance Constraints," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 561-587, December.
    3. Mohri, Seyed Sina & Asgari, Nasrin & Zanjirani Farahani, Reza & Bourlakis, Michael & Laker, Benjamin, 2020. "Fairness in hazmat routing-scheduling: A bi-objective Stackelberg game," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    4. Liping Liu & Jiaming Li & Lei Zhou & Tijun Fan & Shuxia Li, 2021. "Research on Route Optimization of Hazardous Materials Transportation Considering Risk Equity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    5. Zvi Drezner & George Wesolowsky, 2014. "Covering Part of a Planar Network," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 629-646, December.
    6. Kumar, Anand & Roy, Debjit & Verter, Vedat & Sharma, Dheeraj, 2018. "Integrated fleet mix and routing decision for hazmat transportation: A developing country perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 264(1), pages 225-238.
    7. Ke, Ginger Y. & Zhang, Huiwen & Bookbinder, James H., 2020. "A dual toll policy for maintaining risk equity in hazardous materials transportation with fuzzy incident rate," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    8. Reniers, G.L.L. & Dullaert, W., 2013. "A method to assess multi-modal Hazmat transport security vulnerabilities: Hazmat transport SVA," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 103-113.
    9. Fang, Kan & Ke, Ginger Y. & Verma, Manish, 2017. "A routing and scheduling approach to rail transportation of hazardous materials with demand due dates," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(1), pages 154-168.
    10. Guodong Yu & Yu Yang, 2019. "Dynamic routing with real-time traffic information," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 1033-1058, December.
    11. Paul Berglund & Changhyun Kwon, 2014. "Robust Facility Location Problem for Hazardous Waste Transportation," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 91-116, March.
    12. N. Norouzi & R. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam & M. Ghazanfari & M. Alinaghian & A. Salamatbakhsh, 2012. "A New Multi-objective Competitive Open Vehicle Routing Problem Solved by Particle Swarm Optimization," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 609-633, December.
    13. Nie, Yu (Marco) & Wu, Xing & Dillenburg, John F. & Nelson, Peter C., 2012. "Reliable route guidance: A case study from Chicago," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 403-419.
    14. Kuhn, K. & Raith, A. & Schmidt, M. & Schöbel, A., 2016. "Bi-objective robust optimisation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(2), pages 418-431.
    15. Szeto, W.Y. & Farahani, R.Z. & Sumalee, Agachai, 2017. "Link-based multi-class hazmat routing-scheduling problem: A multiple demon approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(1), pages 337-354.
    16. Xiangfeng Ji & Xuegang (Jeff) Ban & Mengtian Li & Jian Zhang & Bin Ran, 2017. "Non-expected Route Choice Model under Risk on Stochastic Traffic Networks," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 777-807, September.
    17. Rahman, Ashrafur & Fiondella, Lance & Lownes, Nicholas E., 2014. "A Bi-Objective Approach to Evaluate Highway Routing and Regulatory Strategies for Hazardous Materials Transportation," Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Transportation Research Forum, vol. 53(1).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohri, Seyed Sina & Mohammadi, Mehrdad & Gendreau, Michel & Pirayesh, Amir & Ghasemaghaei, Ali & Salehi, Vahid, 2022. "Hazardous material transportation problems: A comprehensive overview of models and solution approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(1), pages 1-38.
    2. Szeto, W.Y. & Farahani, R.Z. & Sumalee, Agachai, 2017. "Link-based multi-class hazmat routing-scheduling problem: A multiple demon approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(1), pages 337-354.
    3. Dadkar, Yashoda & Nozick, Linda & Jones, Dean, 2010. "Optimizing facility use restrictions for the movement of hazardous materials," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 267-281, February.
    4. Reilly, Allison & Nozick, Linda & Xu, Ningxiong & Jones, Dean, 2012. "Game theory-based identification of facility use restrictions for the movement of hazardous materials under terrorist threat," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 115-131.
    5. Bronfman, Andrés & Marianov, Vladimir & Paredes-Belmar, Germán & Lüer-Villagra, Armin, 2016. "The maxisum and maximin-maxisum HAZMAT routing problems," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 316-333.
    6. P. Daniel Wright & Matthew J. Liberatore & Robert L. Nydick, 2006. "A Survey of Operations Research Models and Applications in Homeland Security," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 36(6), pages 514-529, December.
    7. Tsung-Sheng Chang & Linda K. Nozick & Mark A. Turnquist, 2005. "Multiobjective Path Finding in Stochastic Dynamic Networks, with Application to Routing Hazardous Materials Shipments," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(3), pages 383-399, August.
    8. Altay, Nezih & Green III, Walter G., 2006. "OR/MS research in disaster operations management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(1), pages 475-493, November.
    9. Hosseini, S. Davod & Verma, Manish, 2018. "Conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) methodology to optimal train configuration and routing of rail hazmat shipments," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 79-103.
    10. Erhan Erkut & Armann Ingolfsson, 2000. "Catastrophe Avoidance Models for Hazardous Materials Route Planning," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 165-179, May.
    11. Garrido, Rodrigo A. & Bronfman, Andrés C., 2017. "Equity and social acceptability in multiple hazardous materials routing through urban areas," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 244-260.
    12. Zhang, Meng & Wang, Nengmin & He, Zhengwen & Jiang, Bin, 2021. "Vehicle routing optimization for hazmat shipments considering catastrophe avoidance and failed edges," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    13. Mohammadi, Mehrdad & Jula, Payman & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, Reza, 2017. "Design of a reliable multi-modal multi-commodity model for hazardous materials transportation under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(3), pages 792-809.
    14. Vaezi, Ali & Verma, Manish, 2018. "Railroad transportation of crude oil in Canada: Developing long-term forecasts, and evaluating the impact of proposed pipeline projects," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 98-111.
    15. Dell'Olmo, Paolo & Gentili, Monica & Scozzari, Andrea, 2005. "On finding dissimilar Pareto-optimal paths," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(1), pages 70-82, April.
    16. Ahipaşaoğlu, Selin Damla & Meskarian, Rudabeh & Magnanti, Thomas L. & Natarajan, Karthik, 2015. "Beyond normality: A cross moment-stochastic user equilibrium model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 333-354.
    17. Tu, Huizhao & Li, Hao & van Lint, Hans & van Zuylen, Henk, 2012. "Modeling travel time reliability of freeways using risk assessment techniques," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(10), pages 1528-1540.
    18. E. Nikolova & N. E. Stier-Moses, 2014. "A Mean-Risk Model for the Traffic Assignment Problem with Stochastic Travel Times," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(2), pages 366-382, April.
    19. Pradhananga, Rojee & Taniguchi, Eiichi & Yamada, Tadashi & Qureshi, Ali Gul, 2014. "Bi-objective decision support system for routing and scheduling of hazardous materials," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 135-148.
    20. Ke, Ginger Y. & Zhang, Huiwen & Bookbinder, James H., 2020. "A dual toll policy for maintaining risk equity in hazardous materials transportation with fuzzy incident rate," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:netspa:v:6:y:2006:i:3:p:253-265. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.