IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jtecht/v50y2025i4d10.1007_s10961-024-10142-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrating philosophy and psychology to enhance creativity and innovation in entrepreneurship: the W.O.M.B. model

Author

Listed:
  • Eduardo Manuel Almeida Leite

    (Universidade da Madeira
    OSEAN - Outermost Regions Sustainable Ecosystem for Entrepreneurship and Innovation
    University of Aberdeen, King’s College)

  • David Audretsch

    (Institute for Development Strategies
    Ameritech Chair of Economic Development at Indiana University)

  • Ana Leite

    (School of Social and Human Sciences, NOVA University of Lisbon)

Abstract

This study explores the intersection between philosophy, psychology, and entrepreneurship to promote creativity and innovation through the W.O.M.B. model (Well-being, Open-mindedness, Mindfulness, and Brilliance). Utilizing insights from Plato, Spinoza, Schopenhauer, and Winnicott, the model integrates classical theories with contemporary practices. The methodology includes an extensive literature review and the practical application of the model in educational and organizational contexts. The results indicate that the W.O.M.B. model can enhance the generation of innovative ideas and employee satisfaction. Practical implications include creating work environments that foster creativity, implementing mindfulness practices, and providing continuous emotional support to employees.

Suggested Citation

  • Eduardo Manuel Almeida Leite & David Audretsch & Ana Leite, 2025. "Integrating philosophy and psychology to enhance creativity and innovation in entrepreneurship: the W.O.M.B. model," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 1396-1415, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:jtecht:v:50:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s10961-024-10142-1
    DOI: 10.1007/s10961-024-10142-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10961-024-10142-1
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10961-024-10142-1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nils Plambeck & K. Weber, 2009. "CEO Ambivalence and Responses to Strategic Issues," Post-Print hal-00464009, HAL.
    2. David B. Audretsch & Maksim Belitski & Rosa Caiazza & Farzana Chowdhury & Matthias Menter, 2023. "Entrepreneurial growth, value creation and new technologies," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(5), pages 1535-1551, October.
    3. James G. March, 1991. "Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 71-87, February.
    4. David B. Audretsch & Maksim Belitski & Farzana Chowdhury, 2024. "Knowledge investment and search for innovation: evidence from the UK firms," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 1387-1410, August.
    5. Scuotto, Veronica & Tzanidis, Theofilos & Usai, Antonio & Quaglia, Roberto, 2023. "The digital humanism era triggered by individual creativity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    6. Audretsch, B. David & Belitski, Maksim, 2023. "The limits to open innovation and its impact on innovation performance," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    7. Grace Li Ann Yong & Kong Weng Ho, 2006. "Innovation, Imitation And Entrepreneurship," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 51(02), pages 147-173.
    8. Martikainen, Suvi Jonna & Kudrna, Laura & Dolan, Paul, 2022. "Moments of meaningfulness and meaninglessness: a qualitative inquiry into affective eudaimonia at work," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 113970, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Magdalena Marczewska & Marzenna Anna Weresa & Marek Lachowicz, 2024. "Towards Creativity and Innovation in Universities: Study on Central and Eastern Europe," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 1363-1385, March.
    10. Benn Lawson & Danny Samson, 2001. "Developing Innovation Capability In Organisations: A Dynamic Capabilities Approach," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 5(03), pages 377-400.
    11. Audretsch, David B. & Belitski, Maksim & Caiazza, Rosa & Phan, Phillip, 2023. "Collaboration strategies and SME innovation performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    12. Sean Kruger & Adriana Aletta Steyn, 2020. "Enhancing technology transfer through entrepreneurial development: practices from innovation spaces," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(6), pages 1655-1689, December.
    13. Robert Hébert & Albert Link, 2006. "The Entrepreneur as Innovator," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 31(5), pages 589-597, September.
    14. Eduardo Manuel de Almeida Leite & David Audretsch & Ana Leite, 2024. "Redefining Entrepreneurship: Philosophical Insights in a Post-individualist Era," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 33(2), pages 239-267, May.
    15. Maksim Belitski & Monika Herzig, 2018. "The Jam Session Model for Group Creativity and Innovative Technology," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 43(2), pages 506-521, April.
    16. Cristiano Antonelli & Christophe Feder, 2022. "Knowledge properties and the creative response in the global economy: European evidence for the years 1990–2016," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 459-475, April.
    17. Nils Plambeck & Klaus Weber, 2009. "CEO Ambivalence and Responses to Strategic Issues," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(6), pages 993-1010, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ferreira, Jorge & Coelho, Arnaldo & Moutinho, Luiz, 2020. "Dynamic capabilities, creativity and innovation capability and their impact on competitive advantage and firm performance: The moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 92.
    2. Beverly B. Tyler & Turanay Caner, 2016. "New product introductions below aspirations, slack and R&D alliances: A behavioral perspective," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(5), pages 896-910, May.
    3. Audretsch, David Bruce & Belitski, Maksim & Spadavecchia, Anna & Zahra, Shaker A., 2024. "The more, the merrier or the less is more? The role of firm capabilities and industry in the knowledge spillover of innovation," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    4. Matsuno, Ken & Kohlbacher, Florian, 2020. "Proactive marketing response to population aging: The roles of capabilities and commitment of firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 93-104.
    5. Päivi Karhu & Paavo Ritala, 2020. "The multiple faces of tension: dualities in decision-making," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 485-518, June.
    6. Mahto, Raj V. & Belousova, Olga & Ahluwalia, Saurabh, 2020. "Abundance – A new window on how disruptive innovation occurs," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    7. Sevda Helpap & Sigrid Bekmeier-Feuerhahn & Luisa Pinkernelle, 2018. "Ambivalenzen in organisationalen Veränderungen [Ambivalence in Organizational Change]," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 70(3), pages 209-241, August.
    8. Christoph Markmann & Alexander Spickermann & Heiko A. von der Gracht & Alexander Brem, 2021. "Improving the question formulation in Delphi‐like surveys: Analysis of the effects of abstract language and amount of information on response behavior," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 3(1), March.
    9. Schriber, Svante & Löwstedt, Jan, 2015. "Tangible resources and the development of organizational capabilities," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 54-68.
    10. Sophia Belghiti-Mahut & Anne-Laurence Lafont & Angélique Rodhain & Florence Rodhain & Leila Temri & Ouidad Yousfi, 2016. "Genre et innovateur frugal : 4 cas de femmes innovatrices," Innovations, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(3), pages 69-93.
    11. Tali Hadasa Blank, 2021. "When incubator resources are crucial: survival chances of student startups operating in an academic incubator," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(6), pages 1845-1868, December.
    12. Dionisio, Eduardo Avancci & Inácio Júnior, Edmundo & Fischer, Bruno Brandão, 2021. "Country-level efficiency and the index of dynamic entrepreneurship: Contributions from an efficiency approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    13. Anne Hamby & Cristel Russell, 2022. "How does ambivalence affect young consumers’ response to risky products?," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 841-863, July.
    14. Cheng, Jie & Huang, Dan & Wu, Yanling, 2023. "Managerial perception on competition and strategic R&D decisions1," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    15. Ryan, Paul & Geoghegan, Will & Hilliard, Rachel, 2018. "The microfoundations of firms’ explorative innovation capabilities within the triple helix framework," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 76, pages 15-27.
    16. Sergey Alexander Anokhin & Manuel Hess & Joakim Wincent, 2025. "Technology sourcing ambidexterity in corporate venture capital: limitations of learning from open innovation," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 64(1), pages 239-258, January.
    17. Quentin Plantec & Pascal Le Masson & Benoit Weil, 2020. "Impact of knowledge search practices on the originality of inventions: a study in the oil & gas industry," Post-Print hal-02613665, HAL.
    18. Yi Liu & Longwei Wang & Changhong Yuan & Yuan Li, 2012. "Information communication, organizational capability and new product development: an empirical study of Chinese firms," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 37(4), pages 416-432, August.
    19. Kuckertz, Andreas & Scheu, Maximilian & Davidsson, Per, 2023. "Chasing mythical creatures – A (not-so-sympathetic) critique of entrepreneurship's obsession with unicorn startups," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 19(C).
    20. Magnus Henrekson & Tino Sanandaji, 2020. "Measuring Entrepreneurship: Do Established Metrics Capture Schumpeterian Entrepreneurship?," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 44(4), pages 733-760, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • L26 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Entrepreneurship
    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • Z10 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jtecht:v:50:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s10961-024-10142-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.