IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/sjobre/v70y2018i3d10.1007_s41471-017-0043-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ambivalenzen in organisationalen Veränderungen
[Ambivalence in Organizational Change]

Author

Listed:
  • Sevda Helpap

    (Technische Universität Hamburg)

  • Sigrid Bekmeier-Feuerhahn

    (Leuphana Universität Lüneburg)

  • Luisa Pinkernelle

    (Leuphana Universität Lüneburg)

Abstract

Zusammenfassung Praxis und Forschung erkennen den hohen Stellenwert von Kommunikation in organisationalen Veränderungen an, dennoch ist bislang unklar, wie Mitarbeitereinstellungen durch Kommunikation beeinflusst werden. Insbesondere die Entstehung und Wirkung von ambivalenten Einstellungen werden vernachlässigt. Diese Studie geht der Frage nach, wie sich die Change-Kommunikation auf positive, negative und ambivalente Einstellungen auswirkt. Anhand einer qualitativen Szenariostudie werden die Einstellungsausprägungen von 168 Mitarbeitern verglichen, die eine partizipative oder eine programmatische Change-Kommunikation erfahren haben. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass bei Mitarbeitern mit ambivalenten Einstellungen die wahrgenommene Unsicherheit besonders hoch ist und dass Ambivalenzen durch eine programmatische Kommunikation begünstigt wird. Zudem werden unterschiedliche Ambivalenztypen identifiziert, wobei insbesondere die kognitive und kognitiv-emotionale Ambivalenz bei den betroffenen Mitarbeitern stark ausgeprägt ist. Abschließend werden theoretische und praktische Implikationen der Studie aufgezeigt.

Suggested Citation

  • Sevda Helpap & Sigrid Bekmeier-Feuerhahn & Luisa Pinkernelle, 2018. "Ambivalenzen in organisationalen Veränderungen [Ambivalence in Organizational Change]," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 70(3), pages 209-241, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:70:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s41471-017-0043-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s41471-017-0043-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41471-017-0043-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s41471-017-0043-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nils Plambeck & K. Weber, 2009. "CEO Ambivalence and Responses to Strategic Issues," Post-Print hal-00464009, HAL.
    2. Raelin, Joseph A., 2012. "Dialogue and deliberation as expressions of democratic leadership in participatory organizational change," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 25(1), pages 7-23.
    3. N. Sharon Hill & Myeong-Gu Seo & Jae Hyeung Kang & M. Susan Taylor, 2012. "Building Employee Commitment to Change Across Organizational Levels: The Influence of Hierarchical Distance and Direct Managers' Transformational Leadership," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(3), pages 758-777, June.
    4. Sally Maitlis & Scott Sonenshein, 2010. "Sensemaking in Crisis and Change: Inspiration and Insights From Weick (1988)," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(3), pages 551-580, May.
    5. Nils Plambeck & Klaus Weber, 2009. "CEO Ambivalence and Responses to Strategic Issues," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(6), pages 993-1010, December.
    6. Dennis A. Gioia & Kumar Chittipeddi, 1991. "Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(6), pages 433-448, September.
    7. Karl E. Weick & Kathleen M. Sutcliffe & David Obstfeld, 2005. "Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(4), pages 409-421, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Blake E. Ashforth & Kristie M. Rogers & Michael G. Pratt & Camille Pradies, 2014. "Ambivalence in Organizations: A Multilevel Approach," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(5), pages 1453-1478, October.
    2. Florence Allard-Poesi, 2015. "Dancing in the Dark: Making Sense of Managerial Roles during Strategic Conversations," Working Papers hal-01145772, HAL.
    3. Lionel Garreau & Serge Perrot, 2012. "Comprendre la dynamique de la socialisation organisationnelle: Une approche par le sensemaking," Post-Print halshs-00949067, HAL.
    4. Florence Allard-Poesi, 2015. "Dancing in the dark: Making sense of managerial roles during strategic conversations," Post-Print hal-01490734, HAL.
    5. Lionel Garreau & Serge Perrot, 2012. "Comprendre la dynamique de la socialisation organisationnelle : une approche par le sensemaking," Post-Print halshs-01054809, HAL.
    6. Loréa Baïada-Hirèche & Lionel Garreau, 2014. "Exploring the dynamics of ethical judgment : the sensemaking-based evolution model," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) halshs-01009708, HAL.
    7. Schuler, Benedikt Alexander & Orr, Kevin & Hughes, Jeffrey, 2023. "My colleagues (do not) think the same: Middle managers’ shared and separate realities in strategy implementation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    8. Tae Jun Bae & James O. Fiet, 2021. "Imprinting Perspective on the Sustainability of Commitments to Competing Institutional Logics of Social Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-27, February.
    9. Loréa Baïada-Hirèche & Lionel Garreau, 2014. "Exploring the dynamics of ethical judgment : the sensemaking-based evolution model," Post-Print halshs-01009708, HAL.
    10. Joep P. Cornelissen, 2012. "Sensemaking Under Pressure: The Influence of Professional Roles and Social Accountability on the Creation of Sense," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 118-137, February.
    11. Niyati Kataria & Glen Kreiner & Elaine Hollensbe & Mathew L Sheep & Jeff Stambaugh, 2018. "The catalytic role of emotions in sensemaking: Evidence from the blogosphere," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 43(3), pages 456-475, August.
    12. Allard-Poesi, Florence, 2015. "Dancing in the dark: Making sense of managerial roles during strategic conversations," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 338-350.
    13. Genevieve Musca & Linda Rouleau & Caroline Facq-Mellet & Frédérique Sitri & Sarah de Vogüé, 2018. "From boat to bags: The role of material chronotopes in adaptive sensemaking," Post-Print hal-01928127, HAL.
    14. Alexandra Galbin, 2021. "Sensemaking in Social Construction of Organization. A Powerful Resource in Pandemic Context," Postmodern Openings, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 12(1), pages 308-318, March.
    15. Gino Cattani & Daniel Sands & Joe Porac & Jason Greenberg, 2018. "Competitive Sensemaking in Value Creation and Capture," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(4), pages 632-657, December.
    16. Ronit Yitshaki & Fredric Kropp & Benson Honig, 2022. "The Role of Compassion in Shaping Social Entrepreneurs’ Prosocial Opportunity Recognition," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(2), pages 617-647, August.
    17. Kent D. Miller & Shu-Jou Lin, 2015. "Analogical reasoning for diagnosing strategic issues in dynamic and complex environments," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(13), pages 2000-2020, December.
    18. Mary Ann Glynn & Lee Watkiss, 2020. "Of Organizing and Sensemaking: From Action to Meaning and Back Again in a Half‐Century of Weick’s Theorizing," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(7), pages 1331-1354, November.
    19. Masashi Goto, 2021. "Accepting the Future as Unforeseeable: Sensemaking by Professionals in the Rise of Artificial Intelligence," Discussion Paper Series DP2021-05, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University.
    20. Eero Vaara & Andrea Whittle, 2022. "Common Sense, New Sense or Non‐Sense? A Critical Discursive Perspective on Power in Collective Sensemaking," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(3), pages 755-781, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:70:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s41471-017-0043-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.