IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Zur korrekten Interpretation der Ergebnisse einer log-linearen Regression bei Heteroskedastie. Eine methodische Untersuchung mit einer Anwendung auf die relativen Löhne von Ausländern / Correctly Interpreting the Results from a Log-linear Regression under Heteroskedasticity. Methods and an Application to the Relative Wages of Immigrants

  • Winkelmann Rainer


    (IZA Bonn, Postfach 7240, D-53072 Bonn)

The common estimator for relative adjusted wage differentials based on dummy variables in loglinear regressions is inconsistent in the presence of group-specific heteroskedasticity. The direction and magnitude of the bias are derived. At the same time, a heteroskedasticity-consistent estimator is proposed. The formulas are exact for normally distributed errors and approximations otherwise. An example on the wage determination in the German labor market shows that ignoring the problem of heteroskedasticity will lead to an underestimation of the relative wage gap between Germans and Immigrants, since the wages of immigrants are relatively less dispersed. Evidence from the literature as well as an independent analysis using data from the German Socio-Economic Panel for 1996 yield a downward bias of up to 25 percent. The importance of these results extend beyond the case of dummy variables to the general problem of Computing expectations of retransformed variables.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by De Gruyter in its journal Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik).

Volume (Year): 221 (2001)
Issue (Month): 4 (August)
Pages: 418-431

in new window

Handle: RePEc:jns:jbstat:v:221:y:2001:i:4:p:418-431
Contact details of provider: Web page:

Order Information: Web:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jns:jbstat:v:221:y:2001:i:4:p:418-431. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Peter Golla)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.