IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/afr111/v3y2014i3p71.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Financial Restatements, Information Asymmetry, and Market Liquidity

Author

Listed:
  • KwangJoo Koo
  • Daewon Kim

Abstract

This paper examine whether firms experience different liquidity effects from earnings restatements before and after the implementation of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) by analyzing various measures of liquidity surrounding the announcement day in the period of 1997-2005. Â The study is based on the premise that SOX was intended to improve the transparency and reliability of reported information. We find that the spreads measured in cents detect an abnormality in liquidity due to a general downward trend in the spreads during the period. Dividing the period into three sub-periods because the SOX reinforce more accountability and more confidence for public financial information, we find virtually all declines in liquidity come from the pre-SOX period, which conversely explains that, no significant change in liquidity in the post-Sox period. Decrease in liquidity is influenced by restatements due to revenue recognition, those prompted by party other than auditors. The results show that firms experience more severe liquidity consequences following restatements announced before SOX. Therefore, information asymmetry should be less problematic, and liquidity should be less adversely affected, for restatements announced after SOX.

Suggested Citation

  • KwangJoo Koo & Daewon Kim, 2014. "Financial Restatements, Information Asymmetry, and Market Liquidity," Accounting and Finance Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 3(3), pages 1-71, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:jfr:afr111:v:3:y:2014:i:3:p:71
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/afr/article/download/4939/3151
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/afr/article/view/4939
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amihud, Yakov, 2002. "Illiquidity and stock returns: cross-section and time-series effects," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 31-56, January.
    2. Rafael La Porta & Florencio Lopez‐De‐Silanes & Andrei Shleifer & Robert Vishny, 2002. "Investor Protection and Corporate Valuation," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 57(3), pages 1147-1170, June.
    3. Aigbe Akhigbe & Ronald Kudla & Jeff Madura, 2005. "Why are some corporate earnings restatements more damaging?," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(5), pages 327-336.
    4. Bacidore, Jeffrey M. & Battalio, Robert H. & Jennings, Robert H., 2002. "Depth improvement and adjusted price improvement on the New York stock exchange," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 5(2), pages 169-195, April.
    5. Nilabhra Bhattacharya & Hemang Desai & Kumar Venkataraman, 2013. "Does Earnings Quality Affect Information Asymmetry? Evidence from Trading Costs," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 482-516, June.
    6. Amihud, Yakov & Mendelson, Haim, 1986. "Asset pricing and the bid-ask spread," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 223-249, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shai Levi & Xiao-Jun Zhang, 2015. "Do Temporary Increases in Information Asymmetry Affect the Cost of Equity?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(2), pages 354-371, February.
    2. Jianhao Su, 2020. "Corporate Governance, Noise Trading and Liquidity of Stocks," Papers 2001.06275, arXiv.org.
    3. Anton Astakhov & Tomas Havranek & Jiri Novak, 2019. "Firm Size And Stock Returns: A Quantitative Survey," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5), pages 1463-1492, December.
    4. Joachim Gassen & Hollis A. Skaife & David Veenman, 2020. "Illiquidity and the Measurement of Stock Price Synchronicity," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(1), pages 419-456, March.
    5. Kryzanowski, Lawrence & Zhang, Ying, 2013. "Financial restatements by Canadian firms cross-listed and not cross-listed in the U.S," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 74-96.
    6. Amiram, Dan & Owens, Edward & Rozenbaum, Oded, 2016. "Do information releases increase or decrease information asymmetry? New evidence from analyst forecast announcements," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 121-138.
    7. Bardos, Katsiaryna Salavei, 2011. "Quality of financial information and liquidity," Review of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 49-62, May.
    8. Xing, Xuejing & Anderson, Randy I. & Hu, Yan, 2016. "What׳s a name worth? The impact of a likeable stock ticker symbol on firm value," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 63-80.
    9. Oleh Danyliv & Bruce Bland & Daniel Nicholass, 2014. "Convenient liquidity measure for Financial markets," Papers 1412.5072, arXiv.org.
    10. Pan, Lee-Hsien & Lin, Chien-Ting & Lee, Shih-Cheng & Ho, Kung-Cheng, 2015. "Information ratings and capital structure," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 17-32.
    11. Li, Ting & Zaiats, Nataliya, 2017. "Information environment and earnings management of dual class firms around the world," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 1-23.
    12. Huang, Hung-Yi & Ho, Kung-Cheng, 2020. "Liquidity, earnings management, and stock expected returns," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    13. Atawnah, Nader & Balachandran, Balasingham & Duong, Huu Nhan & Podolski, Edward J., 2018. "Does exposure to foreign competition affect stock liquidity? Evidence from industry-level import data," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 44-67.
    14. Chakrabarti, Amit & Krishnan, Kaveri, 2021. "Change in Illiquidity of Family Firms with Institutional Pressure: Evidence from India," American Business Review, Pompea College of Business, University of New Haven, vol. 24(2), pages 173-197, November.
    15. Hope, Ole-Kristian & Wang, Jingjing, 2018. "Management deception, big-bath accounting, and information asymmetry: Evidence from linguistic analysis," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 33-51.
    16. Pastor, Lubos & Stambaugh, Robert F., 2003. "Liquidity Risk and Expected Stock Returns," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 111(3), pages 642-685, June.
    17. Chen, Jian & Jiang, Fuwei & Liu, Yangshu & Tu, Jun, 2017. "International volatility risk and Chinese stock return predictability," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 183-203.
    18. Loukil, Nadia & Yousfi, Ouidad, 2010. "Firm's information environment and stock liquidity: evidence from Tunisian context," MPRA Paper 28699, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Feb 2011.
    19. Andres, Christian & Cumming, Douglas & Karabiber, Timur & Schweizer, Denis, 2014. "Do markets anticipate capital structure decisions? — Feedback effects in equity liquidity," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 133-156.
    20. Xuanjuan Chen & Jing-Zhi Huang & Zhenzhen Sun & Tong Yao & Tong Yu, 2020. "Liquidity Premium in the Eye of the Beholder: An Analysis of the Clientele Effect in the Corporate Bond Market," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(2), pages 932-957, February.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:afr111:v:3:y:2014:i:3:p:71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.