IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ist/ibsibr/v53y2024i2p161-183.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Model Proposal for Evaluation of Technology Development Process: Conceptualisation and Scale Development

Author

Listed:
  • Fethi Aslan

Abstract

Traditional approaches based on intuitive decisions of executivies, teams, or individuals often prove inadequate in managing complex technology development processes. Theoretical models proposed for successful technology development processes emphasize the necessity of standardized processes. However, empirical evidence regarding the applications and results of these models is limited. In this context, a model has been developed to examine how standardized technology development processes are implemented at the organizational level in companies. This model is defined by a scale that includes dimensions of technical research, business research, development, and performance. The proposed model is based on data obtained from companies with the highest R&D expenditure in Turkey. The findings provide evidence that a structured technology development process at the corporate level is necessary for success. It has been revealed that technical and business research phases are particularly determining factors in the development process. Additionally, it has been determined that the correct implementation of these processes has a positive impact on the performance of the process.

Suggested Citation

  • Fethi Aslan, 2024. "Model Proposal for Evaluation of Technology Development Process: Conceptualisation and Scale Development," Istanbul Business Research, Istanbul University Business School, vol. 53(2), pages 161-183, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:ist:ibsibr:v:53:y:2024:i:2:p:161-183
    DOI: 10.26650/ibr.2024.53.1338316
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/9FC5A4AAFB7A4AA1819E1FCAADAB59FE
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://iupress.istanbul.edu.tr/en/journal/ibr/article/model-proposal-for-evaluation-of-technology-development-process-conceptualisation-and-scale-development
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26650/ibr.2024.53.1338316?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. C. Brooke Dobni & George Luffman, 2003. "Determining the scope and impact of market orientation profiles on strategy implementation and performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(6), pages 577-585, June.
    2. Angelo Kenneth S. Romasanta & Peter Sijde & Jacqueline Muijlwijk-Koezen, 2020. "Innovation in pharmaceutical R&D: mapping the research landscape," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(3), pages 1801-1832, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ta-Kai Yang & Min-Ren Yan, 2019. "Exploring the Enablers of Strategic Orientation for Technology-Driven Business Innovation Ecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-19, October.
    2. Norida Basnan & Mohd Fairuz Md. Salleh & Azlina Ahmad & Ismail Upawi & Azizah Mohd Harun, 2016. "Information Needs for Accountability Reporting: Perspectives of Stakeholders of Malaysian Public Universities," Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 12(3), pages 68-82, JUNE.
    3. Robb, Anna & Rohrschneider, Marc & Booth, Alex & Carter, Peggy & Walker, Richard & Andrews, Georgina, 2022. "Enhancing organisational innovation capability – A practice-oriented insight for pharmaceutical companies," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    4. Lukas, Bryan A. & Whitwell, Gregory J. & Hill, Paul, 2007. "Export planning orientation and its antecedents: Evidence from exporting IT products," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(12), pages 1282-1289, December.
    5. Dobni, C. Brooke & Sand, Christopher, 2018. "Strategy shift: Integrating strategy and the firm’s capability to innovate," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(5), pages 797-808.
    6. Hasliza Abdul Halim & Noor Hazlina Ahmad & Theresa C. F. Ho & T. Ramayah, 2017. "The Outsourcing Dilemma on Decision to Outsource Among Small and Medium Enterprises in Malaysia," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 18(2), pages 348-364, April.
    7. Gonzalez-Benito, Oscar & Gonzalez-Benito, Javier, 2008. "Implications of market orientation on the environmental transformation of industrial firms," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(4), pages 752-762, February.
    8. Antonio CORREIA de BARROS & Hortensia BARANDAS & Paulo Alexandre PIRES, 2009. "Applying Artificial Neural Networks to Evaluate Export Performance: A Relational Approach," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 10(4), pages 713-734, October.
    9. Lu Lin Zhou & James Onuche Ayegba & Emmanuel Onu Ayegba & Peace Maina Ayegba & Zhang Xin Jie, 2021. "Impact of dynamic capacities on the performance of food and beverage enterprises in Lagos, Nigeria," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-24, December.
    10. Heredia Pérez, Jorge A. & Geldes, Cristian & Kunc, Martin H. & Flores, Alejandro, 2023. "The effect of local institutions on the competitive strategies of exporters. The case of emerging economies in Latin America," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    11. Emerson Wagner Mainardes & Helena Alves & Mario Raposo, 2010. "An Exploratory Research on the Stakeholders of a University," Journal of Management and Strategy, Journal of Management and Strategy, Sciedu Press, vol. 1(1), pages 76-88, December.
    12. Yinghong Susan Wei & Hugh O’Neill & Nan Zhou, 2020. "How Does Perceived Integrity in Leadership Matter to Firms in a Transitional Economy?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 167(4), pages 623-641, December.
    13. Chulmo Koo & Jaeki Song & Yong Jin Kim & Kichan Nam, 2007. "Do e-business strategies matter? The antecedents and relationship with firm performance," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 9(2), pages 283-296, July.
    14. Dobni, C. Brooke, 2006. "The innovation blueprint," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 49(4), pages 329-339.
    15. Emerson W. Mainardes & João Ferreira e Gerson Ontini, 2010. "Vantagens Competitivas em Instituições de Ensino Superior: proposta e teste de um modelo," Working Papers de Gestão, Economia e Marketing (Management, Economics and Marketing Working Papers) td06_2010, Universidade da Beira Interior, Departamento de Gestão e Economia (Portugal).
    16. Rahul Kumar Sett, 2018. "Market orientation − firm performance link in a dynamic environment: looking inside the black box," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 8(3), pages 163-179, December.
    17. Stavroula Spyropoulou & Constantine S. Katsikeas & Dionysis Skarmeas & Neil A. Morgan, 2018. "Strategic goal accomplishment in export ventures: the role of capabilities, knowledge, and environment," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 109-129, January.
    18. Ravindra Jain & Cherry Jain & Prachi Jain, 2013. "Integrated Framework of Antecedents and Effects of Market Orientation," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 38(4), pages 425-445, November.
    19. Wirtz, Jochen & Kowalkowski, Christian & Jaakkola, Elina & Holmlund, Maria & Ulaga, Wolfgang & Ahmed, Tanvir, 2025. "Customer experience management in B2B markets: CXM value propositions and archetypical CXM strategies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    20. Sven Kunisch & Julian Birkinshaw & Michael Boppel & Kira Choi, 2023. "Why do firms launch corporate change programs?," Post-Print hal-04325790, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ist:ibsibr:v:53:y:2024:i:2:p:161-183. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Istanbul University Press Operational Team (Ertuğrul YAŞAR) (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/isisttr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.