IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i20p5779-d277858.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Enablers of Strategic Orientation for Technology-Driven Business Innovation Ecosystems

Author

Listed:
  • Ta-Kai Yang

    (Department of International Business Administration, Chinese Culture University, Taipei City 106, Taiwan)

  • Min-Ren Yan

    (College of Business, Chinese Culture University, Taipei City 106, Taiwan)

Abstract

The present study explores the impacts of corporate strategic orientation on innovation ecosystems through the perspective of systems thinking. Multiple-cases method was adopted to analyze three representative companies of different industries. In terms of academic contribution, the results of this study verify an innovation ecosystem model in a generalized manner, and find that market orientation, interaction orientation, and entrepreneurial orientation generate a positively reinforcing effect on the paths of the innovation ecosystem model in all phases, thus, diversifying the available literature of innovative ecosystems. In terms of practical contribution, this study presents a dynamic context of the development of new business, and describes the links between innovative activities and the market. Enterprises can refer to the proposed framework as well as strategic architecture in this study to effectively transform innovative activities into market performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Ta-Kai Yang & Min-Ren Yan, 2019. "Exploring the Enablers of Strategic Orientation for Technology-Driven Business Innovation Ecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-19, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:20:p:5779-:d:277858
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/20/5779/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/20/5779/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. S. Arunachalam & Sridhar N. Ramaswami & Pol Herrmann & Doug Walker, 2018. "Innovation pathway to profitability: the role of entrepreneurial orientation and marketing capabilities," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 744-766, July.
    2. A. Caruana & M.T. Ewing & Ramaseshan, 2002. "Effects of some Environmental Challenges and Centralization on the Entrepreneurial Orientation and Performance of Public Sector Entities," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 43-58.
    3. Ireland, R. Duane & Webb, Justin W., 2009. "Crossing the great divide of strategic entrepreneurship: Transitioning between exploration and exploitation," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 52(5), pages 469-479, September.
    4. Rajah Rasiah & Xinxin Kong & Yeo Lin, 2010. "Innovation and learning in the integrated circuits industry in Taiwan and China," Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 225-246.
    5. Amnon Frenkel & Shlomo Maital, 2014. "Mapping National Innovation Ecosystems," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 15408.
    6. JinHyo Joseph Yun & DongKyu Won & KyungBae Park & JeongHo Yang & Xiaofei Zhao, 2017. "Growth of a platform business model as an entrepreneurial ecosystem and its effects on regional development," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(5), pages 805-826, May.
    7. Hilton Barrett & Art Weinstein, 1998. "The Effect of Market Orientation and Organizational Flexibility on Corporate Entrepreneurship," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 23(1), pages 57-70, October.
    8. Ron Adner & Rahul Kapoor, 2010. "Value creation in innovation ecosystems: how the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 306-333, March.
    9. Min-Ren Yan, 2015. "Project-Based Market Competition and Policy Implications for Sustainable Developments in Building and Construction Sectors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-26, November.
    10. Fiona Sussan & Ki-Chan Kim & Ravi R. Chinta & John Laurence Enriquez, 2017. "Trade-off between creativity and productivity in technology-based SMEs performance: policy implications in South Korea," Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 510-524, July.
    11. G. Tomas M. Hult & David J. Ketchen, 2001. "Does market orientation matter?: a test of the relationship between positional advantage and performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(9), pages 899-906, September.
    12. Avlonitis, George J. & Salavou, Helen E., 2007. "Entrepreneurial orientation of SMEs, product innovativeness, and performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 60(5), pages 566-575, May.
    13. Birger Wernerfelt, 1984. "A resource‐based view of the firm," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(2), pages 171-180, April.
    14. Kenta Goto, 2013. "Social networks, informal trade credit and its effects on business growth: evidence from the local garment trade in Vietnam," Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 382-395.
    15. Morris, Michael H. & Paul, Gordon W., 1987. "The relationship between entrepreneurship and marketing in established firms," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 2(3), pages 247-259.
    16. Kwaku Atuahene-Gima & Anthony Ko, 2001. "An Empirical Investigation of the Effect of Market Orientation and Entrepreneurship Orientation Alignment on Product Innovation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(1), pages 54-74, February.
    17. C. Brooke Dobni & George Luffman, 2003. "Determining the scope and impact of market orientation profiles on strategy implementation and performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(6), pages 577-585, June.
    18. Yun, JinHyo Joseph & Won, DongKyu & Jeong, EuiSeob & Park, KyungBae & Yang, JeongHo & Park, JiYoung, 2016. "The relationship between technology, business model, and market in autonomous car and intelligent robot industries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 142-155.
    19. Danny Miller, 1983. "The Correlates of Entrepreneurship in Three Types of Firms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(7), pages 770-791, July.
    20. Auh, Seigyoung & Menguc, Bulent, 2005. "Balancing exploration and exploitation: The moderating role of competitive intensity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(12), pages 1652-1661, December.
    21. Annabelle Gawer & Rebecca Henderson, 2007. "Platform Owner Entry and Innovation in Complementary Markets: Evidence from Intel," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(1), pages 1-34, March.
    22. Min-Ren Yan & Kuo-Ming Chien & Lin-Ya Hong & Tai-Ning Yang, 2018. "Evaluating the Collaborative Ecosystem for an Innovation-Driven Economy: A Systems Analysis and Case Study of Science Parks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-13, March.
    23. Mary Tripsas, 1997. "Unraveling The Process Of Creative Destruction: Complementary Assets And Incumbent Survival In The Typesetter Industry," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(S1), pages 119-142, July.
    24. Oh, Deog-Seong & Phillips, Fred & Park, Sehee & Lee, Eunghyun, 2016. "Innovation ecosystems: A critical examination," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1-6.
    25. Fernández-Mesa, Anabel & Alegre, Joaquín, 2015. "Entrepreneurial orientation and export intensity: Examining the interplay of organizational learning and innovation," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 148-156.
    26. Qingrui Xu & Jin Chen & Zhangshu Xie & Jingjiang Liu & Gang Zheng & Yong Wang, 2007. "Total Innovation Management: a novel paradigm of innovation management in the 21st century," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 9-25, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xin Cao & Taohua Ouyang & Puzant Balozian & Sixuan Zhang, 2020. "The Role of Managerial Cognitive Capability in Developing a Sustainable Innovation Ecosystem: A Case Study of Xiaomi," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-27, September.
    2. JinHyo Joseph Yun & Xiaofei Zhao & KwangHo Jung & Tan Yigitcanlar, 2020. "The Culture for Open Innovation Dynamics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-21, June.
    3. Yanzhang Gu & Longying Hu & Hongjin Zhang & Chenxuan Hou, 2021. "Innovation Ecosystem Research: Emerging Trends and Future Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-21, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ta-Kai Yang & Min-Ren Yan, 2020. "The Corporate Shared Value for Sustainable Development: An Ecosystem Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-16, March.
    2. Pushpananthan, Gouthanan & Elmquist, Maria, 2022. "Joining forces to create value: The emergence of an innovation ecosystem," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    3. Ravindra Jain & Cherry Jain & Prachi Jain, 2013. "Integrated Framework of Antecedents and Effects of Market Orientation," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 38(4), pages 425-445, November.
    4. Sabin Foltean & Bogdana Glovatchi, 2021. "Business Model Innovation for IoT Solutions: An Exploratory Study of Strategic Factors and Expected Outcomes," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 23(57), pages 392-392.
    5. Strobl, Andreas & Bauer, Florian & Matzler, Kurt, 2020. "The impact of industry-wide and target market environmental hostility on entrepreneurial leadership in mergers and acquisitions," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 55(2).
    6. Rouma Bucktowar & Akin Kocak & Kesseven Padachi, 2015. "Entrepreneurial Orientation, Market Orientation And Networking: Impact On Innovation And Firm Performance," Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship (JDE), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(04), pages 1-22, December.
    7. Chao Zhang & Jiancheng Guan, 2017. "How to identify metaknowledge trends and features in a certain research field? Evidences from innovation and entrepreneurial ecosystem," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 113(2), pages 1177-1197, November.
    8. Bhuian, Shahid N. & Menguc, Bulent & Bell, Simon J., 2005. "Just entrepreneurial enough: the moderating effect of entrepreneurship on the relationship between market orientation and performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 9-17, January.
    9. Brandon William Soltwisch, 2021. "When the Quest for the Best Pays Off: How Maximising Entrepreneurs Improve Performance by Creating Entrepreneurial and Market Oriented Businesses," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 30(2), pages 223-248, September.
    10. Slavo Radosevic & Denis Eylem Yoruk & Richard Woodward, 2010. "Knowledge source preferences as determinants of strategic entrepreneurial orientation," UCL SSEES Economics and Business working paper series 109, UCL School of Slavonic and East European Studies (SSEES).
    11. Andreas Rauch & Johan Wiklund & G.T. Lumpkin & Michael Frese, 2009. "Entrepreneurial Orientation and Business Performance: An Assessment of past Research and Suggestions for the Future," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 33(3), pages 761-787, May.
    12. Suk Bong Choi & Wang Ro Lee & Seung-Wan Kang, 2020. "Entrepreneurial Orientation, Resource Orchestration Capability, Environmental Dynamics and Firm Performance: A Test of Three-Way Interaction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-13, July.
    13. Sahi, Gurjeet Kaur & Gupta, Mahesh C. & Cheng, T.C.E., 2020. "The effects of strategic orientation on operational ambidexterity: A study of indian SMEs in the industry 4.0 era," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    14. Namita Kaushik & R. C. Dangwal, 2023. "Do Entrepreneurial Orientation and Market Orientation Matter for MSMEs Performance? A Systematic Literature Review," Paradigm, , vol. 27(1), pages 78-92, June.
    15. Amaya Rivas, Adriana & Chen, Yen-Chun & Yang, Ta-Kai, 2020. "Entrepreneurial and alliance orientation alignment in new product development," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    16. Carlo Vallini & Christian Simoni, 2009. "Market-Driven Management as Entrepreneurial Approach," Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management, University of Milano-Bicocca, issue 1 Market-.
    17. Chahal, Hardeep & Gupta, Mahesh & Lonial, Subhash & Raina, Swati, 2019. "Operational flexibility-entrepreneurial orientation relationship: Effects and consequences," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 154-167.
    18. Spaniol, Matthew J. & Rowland, Nicholas J., 2022. "Business ecosystems and the view from the future: The use of corporate foresight by stakeholders of the Ro-Ro shipping ecosystem in the Baltic Sea Region," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    19. Pinar Ozcan & Douglas Hannah, 2020. "Social Origins of Great Strategies Advertising Suppliers to Realize Disruptive Social Media Technology," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(3), pages 193-217, September.
    20. Arenal, Alberto & Armuña, Cristina & Feijoo, Claudio & Ramos, Sergio & Xu, Zimu & Moreno, Ana, 2020. "Innovation ecosystems theory revisited: The case of artificial intelligence in China," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(6).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:20:p:5779-:d:277858. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.