IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ororsc/v37y2026i2p616-637.html

Tight, Loose, or Denied Holding: How Interpersonal Holding Shapes Innovators’ Responses to Innovation Obstacles

Author

Listed:
  • Luke N. Hedden

    (Department of Management, Miami Herbert Business School, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida 33146)

  • Beth S. Schinoff

    (Department of Business Administration, Alfred Lerner College of Business & Economics, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware 19716)

  • Ned Wellman

    (Department of Management and Entrepreneurship, W. P. Carey School of Business, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287)

  • Rebecca Blanchard

    (Zamierowski Institute for Experiential Learning, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas 66160)

Abstract

Innovating at work often requires persistence through distressing obstacles and failures. When innovators experience such distress, they may engage colleagues for interpersonal holding—a process in which the colleague (i.e., “holder”) helps contain the innovator’s distress and provides new ways of understanding the obstacle that incited that distress. Prior research has made great strides in explaining what holding processes share in common across different individuals and in different contexts. However, through an inductive study based on 91 semistructured interviews with 74 innovators in a large hospital system, we find significant variation in the dynamics of interpersonal holding. Our analysis uncovered three distinct “interpersonal holding trajectories”—tight holding, loose holding, and denied holding trajectories. At the heart of these trajectories are distinct interpersonal holding episodes. Each episode varies by how holders engage with the innovators’ distress and the obstacles that caused the distress. These distinct episodes uniquely reinforced (or not) our informants’ innovator identities, ultimately influencing divergent responses to the obstacles that they faced. By building theory from the perspective of those who seek holding, our findings highlight important divergences in how interpersonal holding may unfold and identify important implications for innovators and their organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Luke N. Hedden & Beth S. Schinoff & Ned Wellman & Rebecca Blanchard, 2026. "Tight, Loose, or Denied Holding: How Interpersonal Holding Shapes Innovators’ Responses to Innovation Obstacles," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(2), pages 616-637, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:37:y:2026:i:2:p:616-637
    DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2023.17966
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2023.17966
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/orsc.2023.17966?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beth S. Schinoff & Julianna Pillemer & Kristie M. Rogers & Jennifer Louise Petriglieri, 2025. "Blurring Boundaries in Coworker Relationships: How a Nonwork Setting Becomes a Relational Holding Environment," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(6), pages 2061-2086, November.
    2. Van de Ven, Andrew R., 1986. "Central Problems in the Management of Innovation," Agricultural Research Policy Seminar 139708, University of Minnesota Extension.
    3. Andrew H. Van de Ven, 1986. "Central Problems in the Management of Innovation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(5), pages 590-607, May.
    4. Matthew Beane & Callen Anthony, 2024. "Inverted Apprenticeship: How Senior Occupational Members Develop Practical Expertise and Preserve Their Position When New Technologies Arrive," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 405-431, March.
    5. Travis J. Grosser & David Obstfeld & Emily W. Choi & Meredith Woehler & Virginie Lopez-Kidwell & Giuseppe (Joe) Labianca & Stephen P. Borgatti, 2018. "A Sociopolitical Perspective on Employee Innovativeness and Job Performance: The Role of Political Skill and Network Structure," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(4), pages 612-632, August.
    6. Weiss, Howard M. & Rupp, Deborah E., 2011. "Experiencing Work: An Essay on a Person-Centric Work Psychology," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(1), pages 83-97, March.
    7. Erin Reid, 2015. "Embracing, Passing, Revealing, and the Ideal Worker Image: How People Navigate Expected and Experienced Professional Identities," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(4), pages 997-1017, August.
    8. Robert D. Dewar & Jane E. Dutton, 1986. "The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations: An Empirical Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(11), pages 1422-1433, November.
    9. William A. Kahn, 2025. "Through the Narrows: The Meaning and Enactment of Interpersonal Holding," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(1), pages 340-360, January.
    10. Elisabeth Yang & Julia DiBenigno, 2025. "Opportunistic Change During a Punctuation: How and When the Front Lines Can Drive Bursts of Incremental Change," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(1), pages 40-64, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ma Asunción Esteso-Blasco & María Gil-Marqués & Juan Sapena, 2021. "Leadership in Economy of Communion Companies. Contribution to the Common Good through Innovation," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 77-101, April.
    2. Mahmoud Fallatah, 2019. "Offshoring and Organizational Innovation: The Moderating Roles of Absorptive Capacity and Inter-Functional Integration," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(10), pages 57-63, October.
    3. Gopalakrishnan, S. & Damanpour, F., 1997. "A review of innovation research in economics, sociology and technology management," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 15-28, February.
    4. Bernardo Batiz-Lazo & Kassa Woldesenbet, 2006. "The dynamics of product and process innovations in UK banking," International Journal of Financial Services Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(4), pages 400-421.
    5. Iansiti, Marco, 1995. "Technology integration: Managing technological evolution in a complex environment," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 521-542, July.
    6. Bilal Bourkha & Adam Dewitte & Jeremy Tantely Ranjatoelina, 2015. "Organiser l'imitation d'un business model innovant : quatre propositions pour les entreprises," Working Papers hal-01202625, HAL.
    7. Dedy Dewanto Soeprapto, 2021. "Correlation between knowledge exchange & combination (KEC) and leader member exchange (LMX)," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 10(4), pages 169-182, June.
    8. Wang, Guangping & Miao, C. Fred, 2015. "Effects of sales force market orientation on creativity, innovation implementation, and sales performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(11), pages 2374-2382.
    9. Bouncken, Ricarda B. & Kraus, Sascha, 2013. "Innovation in knowledge-intensive industries: The double-edged sword of coopetition," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(10), pages 2060-2070.
    10. Léonard Boussioux & Jacqueline N. Lane & Miaomiao Zhang & Vladimir Jacimovic & Karim R. Lakhani, 2024. "The Crowdless Future? Generative AI and Creative Problem-Solving," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(5), pages 1589-1607, September.
    11. Samar Hayat Khan & Abdul Majid & Muhammad Yasir, 2014. "Impact of Human Capital on the Organization’s Innovative Capabilities: Case of Telecom Sector in Pakistan," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 6(2), pages 88-95.
    12. Stephen J. Mezias & Mary Ann Glynn, 1993. "The three faces of corporate renewal: Institution, revolution, and evolution," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(2), pages 77-101, February.
    13. Justin J. P. Jansen & Frans A. J. Van Den Bosch & Henk W. Volberda, 2006. "Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, and Performance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(11), pages 1661-1674, November.
    14. Delgado-Verde, Miriam & Martín-de Castro, Gregorio & Amores-Salvadó, Javier, 2016. "Intellectual capital and radical innovation: Exploring the quadratic effects in technology-based manufacturing firms," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 35-47.
    15. Rosenbusch, Nina & Brinckmann, Jan & Bausch, Andreas, 2011. "Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 441-457, July.
    16. Chang, Dae Ryun & Cho, Hang, 2008. "Organizational memory influences new product success," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(1), pages 13-23, January.
    17. Dedy Dewanto Soeprapto, 2021. "Determining the key success factors in the organization of BP Tapera," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 10(6), pages 42-55, September.
    18. Bilal Bourkha & Adam Dewitte & Jérémy Tantely Ranjatoelina, 2016. "Organizing the imitation of an innovative business model: four propositions to operationalize a strategy of imitation [Organiser l'imitation d'un business model innovant : Quatre propositions pour les entreprises]," Post-Print hal-01987155, HAL.
    19. Manuel Alfonso Garzón Castrillón & Alberto Ibarra Mares, 2013. "Innovación empresarial, difusión, definiciones y tipología. Una revisión de literatura," Dimensión Empresarial, Universidad Autónoma del Caribe.
    20. Dedy Dewanto, 2020. "The characteristic of Leader-member Exchange (LMX) relationship between leader and follower: A case in construction industry," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 9(6), pages 77-90, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:37:y:2026:i:2:p:616-637. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.