IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v52y2004i4p546-562.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Valuation and Optimal Operation of Electric Power Plants in Competitive Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Matt Thompson

    (Queen's School of Business, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L 3N6)

  • Matt Davison

    (Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5B8)

  • Henning Rasmussen

    (Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5B8)

Abstract

We present an algorithm for the valuation and optimal operation of hydroelectric and thermal power generators in deregulated electricity markets. Real options theory is used to derive nonlinear partial-integro-differential equations (PIDEs) for the valuation and optimal operating strategies of both types of facilities. The equations are designed to incorporate a wide class of spot price models that can exhibit the same time-dependent, mean-reverting dynamics and price spikes as those observed in most electricity markets. Particular attention is paid to the operational characteristics of real power generators. For thermal power plants, these characteristics include variable start-up times and costs, control response time lags, minimum generating levels, nonlinear output functions, and structural limitations on ramp rates. For hydroelectric units, head effects and environmental constraints are addressed. We illustrate the models with numerical examples of a pump storage facility and a thermal power plant. This PIDE framework can achieve high levels of computational speed and accuracy while incorporating a wide range of spot price dynamics and operational characteristics.

Suggested Citation

  • Matt Thompson & Matt Davison & Henning Rasmussen, 2004. "Valuation and Optimal Operation of Electric Power Plants in Competitive Markets," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(4), pages 546-562, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:52:y:2004:i:4:p:546-562
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.1040.0117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.1040.0117
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.1040.0117?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oliveira, P. & McKee, S. & Coles, C., 1993. "Optimal scheduling of a hydro thermal power generation system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 71(3), pages 334-340, December.
    2. Philpott, A. B. & Craddock, M. & Waterer, H., 2000. "Hydro-electric unit commitment subject to uncertain demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(2), pages 410-424, September.
    3. Samer Takriti & Benedikt Krasenbrink & Lilian S.-Y. Wu, 2000. "Incorporating Fuel Constraints and Electricity Spot Prices into the Stochastic Unit Commitment Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 48(2), pages 268-280, April.
    4. Les Clewlow & Chris Strickland, 1999. "A Multi-Factor Model for Energy Derivatives," Research Paper Series 28, Quantitative Finance Research Centre, University of Technology, Sydney.
    5. Chung-Li Tseng & Graydon Barz, 2002. "Short-Term Generation Asset Valuation: A Real Options Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 50(2), pages 297-310, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matt Thompson, 2013. "Optimal Economic Dispatch and Risk Management of Thermal Power Plants in Deregulated Markets," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(4), pages 791-809, August.
    2. Jiang, Ruiwei & Zhang, Muhong & Li, Guang & Guan, Yongpei, 2014. "Two-stage network constrained robust unit commitment problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(3), pages 751-762.
    3. Philip J. Neame & Andrew B. Philpott & Geoffrey Pritchard, 2003. "Offer Stack Optimization in Electricity Pool Markets," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 51(3), pages 397-408, June.
    4. Fleten, Stein-Erik & Kristoffersen, Trine Krogh, 2007. "Stochastic programming for optimizing bidding strategies of a Nordic hydropower producer," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(2), pages 916-928, September.
    5. Wim Ackooij & Jérôme Malick, 2016. "Decomposition algorithm for large-scale two-stage unit-commitment," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 587-613, March.
    6. Eduardo Faria & Stein-Erik Fleten, 2011. "Day-ahead market bidding for a Nordic hydropower producer: taking the Elbas market into account," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 75-101, April.
    7. Fan, Lei & Pan, Kai & Guan, Yongpei, 2019. "A strengthened mixed-integer linear programming formulation for combined-cycle units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(3), pages 865-881.
    8. Wim Ackooij & Jérôme Malick, 2016. "Decomposition algorithm for large-scale two-stage unit-commitment," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 238(1), pages 587-613, March.
    9. Chiarella, Carl & Kang, Boda & Nikitopoulos, Christina Sklibosios & Tô, Thuy-Duong, 2013. "Humps in the volatility structure of the crude oil futures market: New evidence," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 989-1000.
    10. Tseng, Chung-Li & Zhu, Wei & Dmitriev, Alexandre, 2009. "Variable capacity utilization, ambient temperature shocks and generation asset valuation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 888-896, November.
    11. Takashima, Ryuta & Goto, Makoto & Kimura, Hiroshi & Madarame, Haruki, 2008. "Entry into the electricity market: Uncertainty, competition, and mothballing options," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 1809-1830, July.
    12. Dunguo Mou, 2018. "Wind Power Development and Energy Storage under China’s Electricity Market Reform—A Case Study of Fujian Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-20, January.
    13. Seiji Harikae & James S. Dyer & Tianyang Wang, 2021. "Valuing Real Options in the Volatile Real World," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(1), pages 171-189, January.
    14. Möst, Dominik & Keles, Dogan, 2010. "A survey of stochastic modelling approaches for liberalised electricity markets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(2), pages 543-556, December.
    15. Alexis Tantet & Philippe Drobinski, 2021. "A Minimal System Cost Minimization Model for Variable Renewable Energy Integration: Application to France and Comparison to Mean-Variance Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-38, August.
    16. Lee, Shun-Chung, 2011. "Using real option analysis for highly uncertain technology investments: The case of wind energy technology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(9), pages 4443-4450.
    17. Fuss, Sabine & Szolgayová, Jana & Khabarov, Nikolay & Obersteiner, Michael, 2012. "Renewables and climate change mitigation: Irreversible energy investment under uncertainty and portfolio effects," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 59-68.
    18. Lee, Shun-Chung & Shih, Li-Hsing, 2010. "Renewable energy policy evaluation using real option model -- The case of Taiwan," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(Supplemen), pages 67-78, September.
    19. Hlouskova, Jaroslava & Kossmeier, Stephan & Obersteiner, Michael & Schnabl, Alexander, 2005. "Real options and the value of generation capacity in the German electricity market," Review of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(3-4), pages 297-310.
    20. Max F. Schöne & Stefan Spinler, 2017. "A four-factor stochastic volatility model of commodity prices," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 135-165, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:52:y:2004:i:4:p:546-562. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.