IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v27y2025i1p161-180.html

Estimating Demand with Unobserved No-Purchases on Revenue-Managed Data

Author

Listed:
  • Anran Li

    (Department of Decisions, Operations and Technology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong)

  • Kalyan Talluri

    (Department of Analytics and Operations, Imperial College Business School, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom)

  • Müge Tekin

    (Department of Technology and Operations Management, Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University, 3062 PA Rotterdam, Netherlands)

Abstract

Problem definition : This paper studies the joint estimation of the consumer arrival rate and choice model parameters when “no-purchasers” (customers who considered the product but did not purchase) are not observable. Estimating this unconstrained demand even with the simplest discrete-choice model such as the multinomial logit (MNL) becomes challenging as we do not know the fraction that have chosen the outside option (i.e., not purchased). Methods have been proposed to use market share to pin down the parameter associated with the outside option. However, market share data are difficult to obtain in many situations, and in some industries, such as fashion retail, have little meaning as the items are difficult to compare. In this paper, we point out an additional difficulty that can arise in practice: Many firms monitor sales and optimize their prices and assortments within the sale period as part of their revenue management (RM) process, based on partially observed demand. This can potentially cause a revenue management induced endogeneity as the data used for estimation is the result of optimization (in turn based on prior data) to set controls. As we demonstrate, methods that work well on randomly generated assortments may do badly on optimized assortment data. Methodology/results : In this paper, we propose a robust method when the firm cannot observe no-purchases and has no market share information, and the data have been revenue-managed. We develop a two-step generalized method-of-moments (GMM) procedure that is based on a modified moment condition, and importantly, does not require instrumental variables (IVs), a significant advantage in practice. Managerial implications : In Monte Carlo simulations, the performance of our method matches existing methods when the controls are generated randomly, and is robust under all conditions, whether RM-induced endogeneity is present or not. On a large real-world data set from the fashion industry, subject to stock-outs and markdown pricing along with unknown management controls, our method provides robust estimates compared with existing methods without requiring any input on market shares, which is especially difficult to pin down at a category and season/collection level.

Suggested Citation

  • Anran Li & Kalyan Talluri & Müge Tekin, 2025. "Estimating Demand with Unobserved No-Purchases on Revenue-Managed Data," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 161-180, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:27:y:2025:i:1:p:161-180
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2021.0291
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2021.0291
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2021.0291?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gustavo Vulcano & Garrett van Ryzin & Richard Ratliff, 2012. "Estimating Primary Demand for Substitutable Products from Sales Transaction Data," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(2), pages 313-334, April.
    2. Tarek Abdallah & Gustavo Vulcano, 2021. "Demand Estimation Under the Multinomial Logit Model from Sales Transaction Data," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(5), pages 1196-1216, September.
    3. Wooldridge, Jeffrey M., 1997. "Multiplicative Panel Data Models Without the Strict Exogeneity Assumption," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(5), pages 667-678, October.
    4. Jeffrey P. Newman & Mark E. Ferguson & Laurie A. Garrow & Timothy L. Jacobs, 2014. "Estimation of Choice-Based Models Using Sales Data from a Single Firm," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 16(2), pages 184-197, May.
    5. Shivaram Subramanian & Pavithra Harsha, 2021. "Demand Modeling in the Presence of Unobserved Lost Sales," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 3803-3833, June.
    6. Peter P. Belobaba, 1989. "OR Practice—Application of a Probabilistic Decision Model to Airline Seat Inventory Control," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 37(2), pages 183-197, April.
    7. Kalyan Talluri, 2009. "A finite-population revenue management model and a risk-ratio procedure for the joint estimation of population size and parameters," Economics Working Papers 1141, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    8. Blundell, Richard & Griffith, Rachel & Windmeijer, Frank, 2002. "Individual effects and dynamics in count data models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 108(1), pages 113-131, May.
    9. Rainer Winkelmann, 2008. "Econometric Analysis of Count Data," Springer Books, Springer, edition 0, number 978-3-540-78389-3, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sanghoon Cho & Mark Ferguson & Pelin Pekgün & Andrew Vakhutinsky, 2023. "Estimating Personalized Demand with Unobserved No-Purchases Using a Mixture Model: An Application in the Hotel Industry," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(4), pages 1245-1262, July.
    2. Ningyuan Chen & Ming Hu, 2023. "Frontiers in Service Science: Data-Driven Revenue Management: The Interplay of Data, Model, and Decisions," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(2), pages 79-91, June.
    3. Shivaram Subramanian & Pavithra Harsha, 2021. "Demand Modeling in the Presence of Unobserved Lost Sales," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 3803-3833, June.
    4. Garrett van Ryzin & Gustavo Vulcano, 2015. "A Market Discovery Algorithm to Estimate a General Class of Nonparametric Choice Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(2), pages 281-300, February.
    5. Ali Hortaçsu & Olivia R. Natan & Hayden Parsley & Timothy Schwieg & Kevin R. Williams, 2023. "Demand estimation with infrequent purchases and small market sizes," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 14(4), pages 1251-1294, November.
    6. Yoshitsugu Kitazawa, 2010. "Size of economic activity and occurrence of fatal traffic accidents: a count panel data analysis on Fukuoka prefecture in Japan," Discussion Papers 41, Kyushu Sangyo University, Faculty of Economics.
    7. Fukushi, Mitsuyoshi & Delgado, Felipe & Raveau, Sebastián & Santos, Bruno F., 2022. "CHAIRS: A choice-based air transport simulator applied to airline competition and revenue management," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 297-315.
    8. Hagedoorn, John & Wang, Ning, 2010. "Is there complementarity or substitutability between internal and external R&D strategies?," MERIT Working Papers 2010-005, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    9. Jun Li & Serguei Netessine & Sergei Koulayev, 2018. "Price to Compete … with Many: How to Identify Price Competition in High-Dimensional Space," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(9), pages 4118-4136, September.
    10. Guillermo Gallego & Haengju Lee, 2020. "Callable products with dependent demands," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 67(3), pages 185-200, April.
    11. Karsten Schweikert & Manuel Huth & Mark Gius, 2021. "Detecting a copycat effect in school shootings using spatio‐temporal panel count models," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 39(4), pages 719-736, October.
    12. Stiebale, Joel, 2016. "Cross-border M&As and innovative activity of acquiring and target firms," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 1-15.
    13. Jun Li & Nelson Granados & Serguei Netessine, 2014. "Are Consumers Strategic? Structural Estimation from the Air-Travel Industry," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(9), pages 2114-2137, September.
    14. Morakinyo O Adetutu & Kayode A Odusanya & Eleni Stathopoulou & Thomas G Weyman-Jones, 2023. "Environmental regulation, taxes, and activism," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 75(2), pages 460-489.
    15. Su, Hsin-Ning & Moaniba, Igam M., 2017. "Does innovation respond to climate change? Empirical evidence from patents and greenhouse gas emissions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 49-62.
    16. Stéphane Bonhomme & Kevin Dano & Bryan S. Graham, 2023. "Identification in a binary choice panel data model with a predetermined covariate," CeMMAP working papers 17/23, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    17. Yoshitsugu Kitazawa, 2012. "An improved theoretical ground for the linear feedback model and a new indicator," Discussion Papers 58, Kyushu Sangyo University, Faculty of Economics.
    18. Nesta, Lionel & Vona, Francesco & Nicolli, Francesco, 2014. "Environmental policies, competition and innovation in renewable energy," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 396-411.
    19. Joan Costa‐Font & Cristina Vilaplana‐Prieto, 2020. "‘More than one red herring'? Heterogeneous effects of ageing on health care utilisation," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(S1), pages 8-29, October.
    20. Zizhuo Wang & Chaolin Yang & Hongsong Yuan & Yaowu Zhang, 2021. "Aggregation Bias in Estimating Log‐Log Demand Function," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(11), pages 3906-3922, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:27:y:2025:i:1:p:161-180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.