IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v25y2023i6p2298-2313.html

Multi-purchase Behavior: Modeling, Estimation, and Optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Theja Tulabandhula

    (Information and Decision Sciences, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60607)

  • Deeksha Sinha

    (Operations Research Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139)

  • Saketh Reddy Karra

    (Information and Decision Sciences, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60607)

  • Prasoon Patidar

    (Software and Societal Systems, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213)

Abstract

Problem definition : We study the problem of modeling purchase of multiple products and using it to display optimized recommendations for online retailers and e-commerce platforms. Rich modeling of users and fast computation of optimal products to display given these models can lead to significantly higher revenues and simultaneously enhance the user experience. Methodology/results : We present a parsimonious multi-purchase family of choice models called the BundleMVL-K family and develop a binary search based iterative strategy that efficiently computes optimized recommendations for this model. We establish the hardness of computing optimal recommendation sets and derive several structural properties of the optimal solution that aid in speeding up computation. This is one of the first attempts at operationalizing multi-purchase class of choice models. We show one of the first quantitative links between modeling multiple purchase behavior and revenue gains. The efficacy of our modeling and optimization techniques compared with competing solutions is shown using several real-world data sets on multiple metrics such as model fitness, expected revenue gains, and run-time reductions. For example, the expected revenue benefit of taking multiple purchases into account is observed to be ∼ 5 % in relative terms for the Ta Feng and UCI shopping data sets compared with the multinomial choice model for instances with ∼1,500 products. Additionally, across six real-world data sets, the test log-likelihood fits of our models are on average 17% better in relative terms. Managerial implications : Our work contributes to the study of multi-purchase decisions, analyzing consumer demand, and the retailers optimization problem. The simplicity of our models and the iterative nature of our optimization technique allows practitioners meet stringent computational constraints while increasing their revenues in practical recommendation applications at scale, especially in e-commerce platforms and other marketplaces.

Suggested Citation

  • Theja Tulabandhula & Deeksha Sinha & Saketh Reddy Karra & Prasoon Patidar, 2023. "Multi-purchase Behavior: Modeling, Estimation, and Optimization," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(6), pages 2298-2313, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:25:y:2023:i:6:p:2298-2313
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2020.0238
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2020.0238
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2020.0238?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gerardo Berbeglia & Agustín Garassino & Gustavo Vulcano, 2022. "A Comparative Empirical Study of Discrete Choice Models in Retail Operations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(6), pages 4005-4023, June.
    2. Jacob Feldman & Dennis J. Zhang & Xiaofei Liu & Nannan Zhang, 2022. "Customer Choice Models vs. Machine Learning: Finding Optimal Product Displays on Alibaba," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 70(1), pages 309-328, January.
    3. D. R. Cox, 1972. "The Analysis of Multivariate Binary Data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 21(2), pages 113-120, June.
    4. Puneet Manchanda & Asim Ansari & Sunil Gupta, 1999. "The “Shopping Basket”: A Model for Multicategory Purchase Incidence Decisions," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(2), pages 95-114.
    5. Train,Kenneth E., 2009. "Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521747387, Enero-Abr.
    6. Jose Blanchet & Guillermo Gallego & Vineet Goyal, 2016. "A Markov Chain Approximation to Choice Modeling," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(4), pages 886-905, August.
    7. R. L. Plackett, 1975. "The Analysis of Permutations," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 24(2), pages 193-202, June.
    8. McCardle, Kevin F. & Rajaram, Kumar & Tang, Christopher S., 2007. "Bundling retail products: Models and analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(2), pages 1197-1217, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Ping & An, Qingxian & Liang, Liang, 2025. "Consumer preference estimation based on intertemporal choice data: A chance constrained data envelopment analysis method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 325(3), pages 487-499.
    2. Zuo-Jun Max Shen & Shuo Sun & Yongzhi Qi & Hao Hu & Ningxuan Kang & Jianshen Zhang & Xin Wang & Xiaoming Lin, 2025. "JD.com Improves Fulfillment Efficiency with Data-Driven Integrated Assortment Planning and Inventory Allocation," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 55(5), pages 386-398, September.
    3. Xiaobo Li & Hongyuan Lin & Fang Liu, 2024. "Should Only Popular Products Be Stocked? Warehouse Assortment Selection for E-Commerce Companies," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 26(4), pages 1372-1386, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ningyuan Chen & Ming Hu, 2023. "Frontiers in Service Science: Data-Driven Revenue Management: The Interplay of Data, Model, and Decisions," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(2), pages 79-91, June.
    2. Theja Tulabandhula & Deeksha Sinha & Saketh Reddy Karra & Prasoon Patidar, 2020. "Multi-Purchase Behavior: Modeling, Estimation and Optimization," Papers 2006.08055, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2023.
    3. Kim, Chul & Jun, Duk Bin & Park, Sungho, 2018. "Capturing flexible correlations in multiple-discrete choice outcomes using copulas," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 34-59.
    4. Richards, Timothy J. & Hamilton, Stephen F. & Yonezawa, Koichi, 2018. "Retail Market Power in a Shopping Basket Model of Supermarket Competition," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 94(3), pages 328-342.
    5. Shipra Agrawal & Vashist Avadhanula & Vineet Goyal & Assaf Zeevi, 2019. "MNL-Bandit: A Dynamic Learning Approach to Assortment Selection," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 1453-1485, September.
    6. Xiao-Yue Gong & Vineet Goyal & Garud N. Iyengar & David Simchi-Levi & Rajan Udwani & Shuangyu Wang, 2022. "Online Assortment Optimization with Reusable Resources," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(7), pages 4772-4785, July.
    7. Will Ma, 2023. "When Is Assortment Optimization Optimal?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(4), pages 2088-2105, April.
    8. Yuyang Tan & Hao Gong & Chunxiang Guo, 2025. "Bi-Objective Optimization of Product Selection and Ranking Considering Sequential Search," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, August.
    9. Antoine Désir & Vineet Goyal & Danny Segev & Chun Ye, 2020. "Constrained Assortment Optimization Under the Markov Chain–based Choice Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(2), pages 698-721, February.
    10. Ali Aouad & Danny Segev, 2021. "Display Optimization for Vertically Differentiated Locations Under Multinomial Logit Preferences," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 3519-3550, June.
    11. Bonnet, Céline & Richards, Timothy J., 2016. "Models of Consumer Demand for Differentiated Products," TSE Working Papers 16-741, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    12. Guillermo Gallego & Haengju Lee, 2020. "Callable products with dependent demands," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 67(3), pages 185-200, April.
    13. Kameng Nip & Zhenbo Wang & Zizhuo Wang, 2021. "Assortment Optimization under a Single Transition Choice Model," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(7), pages 2122-2142, July.
    14. Bhat, Chandra R., 2008. "The multiple discrete-continuous extreme value (MDCEV) model: Role of utility function parameters, identification considerations, and model extensions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 274-303, March.
    15. Shouchang Chen & Zhenzhen Yan & Yun Fong Lim, 2024. "Managing the Personalized Order-Holding Problem in Online Retailing," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 47-65, January.
    16. Ali Aouad & Jacob Feldman & Danny Segev, 2023. "The Exponomial Choice Model for Assortment Optimization: An Alternative to the MNL Model?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(5), pages 2814-2832, May.
    17. Fernando Bernstein & Yuan Guo, 2023. "Managing Customer Search: Assortment Planning for a Subscription Box Service," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(5), pages 1623-1642, September.
    18. Guiyun Feng & Xiaobo Li & Zizhuo Wang, 2017. "Technical Note—On the Relation Between Several Discrete Choice Models," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(6), pages 1516-1525, December.
    19. Hongzhang Shao & Anton J. Kleywegt, 2020. "Joint Estimation of Discrete Choice Model and Arrival Rate with Unobserved Stock-out Events," Papers 2003.02313, arXiv.org.
    20. Sasanka Adikari & Norou Diawara, 2024. "Utility in Time Description in Priority Best–Worst Discrete Choice Models: An Empirical Evaluation Using Flynn’s Data," Stats, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-18, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:25:y:2023:i:6:p:2298-2313. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.