IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v68y2022i7p4772-4785.html

Online Assortment Optimization with Reusable Resources

Author

Listed:
  • Xiao-Yue Gong

    (Operations Research Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139)

  • Vineet Goyal

    (Industrial Engineering and Operations Research, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027)

  • Garud N. Iyengar

    (Industrial Engineering and Operations Research, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027)

  • David Simchi-Levi

    (Institute for Data, Systems, and Society, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Operations Research Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139)

  • Rajan Udwani

    (Industrial Engineering and Operations Research, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720)

  • Shuangyu Wang

    (Institute for Data, Systems, and Society, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Operations Research Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139)

Abstract

We consider an online assortment optimization problem where we have n substitutable products with fixed reusable capacities c 1 , … , c n . In each period t , a user with some preferences (potentially adversarially chosen) who offers a subset of products, S t , from the set of available products arrives at the seller’s platform. The user selects product j ∈ S t with probability given by the preference model and uses it for a random number of periods, t ˜ j , that is distributed i.i.d. according to some distribution that depends only on j generating a revenue r j ( t ˜ j ) for the seller. The goal of the seller is to find a policy that maximizes the expected cumulative revenue over a finite horizon T . Our main contribution is to show that a simple myopic policy (where we offer the myopically optimal assortment from the available products to each user) provides a good approximation for the problem. In particular, we show that the myopic policy is 1/2-competitive, that is, the expected cumulative revenue of the myopic policy is at least half the expected revenue of the optimal policy with full information about the sequence of user preference models and the distribution of random usage times of all the products. In contrast, the myopic policy does not require any information about future arrivals or the distribution of random usage times. The analysis is based on a coupling argument that allows us to bound the expected revenue of the optimal algorithm in terms of the expected revenue of the myopic policy. We also consider the setting where usage time distributions can depend on the type of each user and show that in this more general case there is no online algorithm with a nontrivial competitive ratio guarantee. Finally, we perform numerical experiments to compare the robustness and performance of myopic policy with other natural policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiao-Yue Gong & Vineet Goyal & Garud N. Iyengar & David Simchi-Levi & Rajan Udwani & Shuangyu Wang, 2022. "Online Assortment Optimization with Reusable Resources," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(7), pages 4772-4785, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:68:y:2022:i:7:p:4772-4785
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2021.4134
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4134
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4134?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James Cruise & Matthieu Jonckheere & Seva Shneer, 2020. "Stability of JSQ in queues with general server-job class compatibilities," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 95(3), pages 271-279, August.
    2. Train,Kenneth E., 2009. "Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521766555, Enero-Abr.
    3. Negin Golrezaei & Hamid Nazerzadeh & Paat Rusmevichientong, 2014. "Real-Time Optimization of Personalized Assortments," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(6), pages 1532-1551, June.
    4. Carri W. Chan & Vivek F. Farias, 2009. "Stochastic Depletion Problems: Effective Myopic Policies for a Class of Dynamic Optimization Problems," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 333-350, May.
    5. Guillermo Gallego & Huseyin Topaloglu, 2014. "Constrained Assortment Optimization for the Nested Logit Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(10), pages 2583-2601, October.
    6. Paat Rusmevichientong & Mika Sumida & Huseyin Topaloglu, 2020. "Dynamic Assortment Optimization for Reusable Products with Random Usage Durations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(7), pages 2820-2844, July.
    7. Jose Blanchet & Guillermo Gallego & Vineet Goyal, 2016. "A Markov Chain Approximation to Choice Modeling," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(4), pages 886-905, August.
    8. Kalyan Talluri & Garrett van Ryzin, 2004. "Revenue Management Under a General Discrete Choice Model of Consumer Behavior," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(1), pages 15-33, January.
    9. James M. Davis & Guillermo Gallego & Huseyin Topaloglu, 2014. "Assortment Optimization Under Variants of the Nested Logit Model," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(2), pages 250-273, April.
    10. Retsef Levi & Ana Radovanović, 2010. "Provably Near-Optimal LP-Based Policies for Revenue Management in Systems with Reusable Resources," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(2), pages 503-507, April.
    11. R. L. Plackett, 1975. "The Analysis of Permutations," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 24(2), pages 193-202, June.
    12. Will Ma & David Simchi-Levi, 2020. "Algorithms for Online Matching, Assortment, and Pricing with Tight Weight-Dependent Competitive Ratios," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(6), pages 1787-1803, November.
    13. Qian Liu & Garrett van Ryzin, 2008. "On the Choice-Based Linear Programming Model for Network Revenue Management," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 10(2), pages 288-310, October.
    14. Daniel McFadden & Kenneth Train, 2000. "Mixed MNL models for discrete response," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(5), pages 447-470.
    15. Fernando Bernstein & A. Gürhan Kök & Lei Xie, 2015. "Dynamic Assortment Customization with Limited Inventories," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 538-553, October.
    16. Michael O. Ball & Maurice Queyranne, 2009. "Toward Robust Revenue Management: Competitive Analysis of Online Booking," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(4), pages 950-963, August.
    17. A. Gürhan Kök & Marshall L. Fisher & Ramnath Vaidyanathan, 2015. "Assortment Planning: Review of Literature and Industry Practice," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Narendra Agrawal & Stephen A. Smith (ed.), Retail Supply Chain Management, edition 2, chapter 0, pages 175-236, Springer.
    18. Yiwei Chen & Retsef Levi & Cong Shi, 2017. "Revenue Management of Reusable Resources with Advanced Reservations," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(5), pages 836-859, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohammad Reza Aminian & Vahideh Manshadi & Rad Niazadeh, 2025. "Markovian Search with Ex-Ante Constraints: Theory and Applications to Socially Aware Algorithmic Hiring," Papers 2501.13346, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2025.
    2. Woonghee Tim Huh & Joseph Paat & Maurice Queyranne, 2026. "Performance of the Offer-Everything Policy," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 74(1), pages 141-160, January.
    3. Shiri, Davood & Akbari, Vahid & Hassanzadeh, Ali, 2024. "The Capacitated Team Orienteering Problem: An online optimization framework with predictions of unknown accuracy," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    4. Jinpeng Liang & Guodong Lyu & Chung-Piaw Teo & Ziyou Gao, 2023. "Online Passenger Flow Control in Metro Lines," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 71(2), pages 768-775, March.
    5. Ali Aouad & Daniela Saban, 2023. "Online Assortment Optimization for Two-Sided Matching Platforms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(4), pages 2069-2087, April.
    6. David Simchi-Levi & Zeyu Zheng & Feng Zhu, 2025. "Offline Planning and Online Learning Under Recovering Rewards," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(1), pages 298-317, January.
    7. David Simchi-Levi & Zeyu Zheng & Feng Zhu, 2025. "On Greedy-Like Policies in Online Matching with Reusable Network Resources and Decaying Rewards," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(10), pages 8908-8926, October.
    8. Legros, Benjamin & van Leeuwaarden, J.S.H. & Fransoo, Jan C., 2025. "Managing reusable resources with usage time limits," Other publications TiSEM 10a58c0a-9a6c-49a4-8a41-d, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    9. Vineet Goyal & Garud Iyengar & Rajan Udwani, 2025. "Asymptotically Optimal Competitive Ratio for Online Allocation of Reusable Resources," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 73(4), pages 1897-1915, July.
    10. Yiding Feng & Rad Niazadeh, 2025. "Batching and Optimal Multistage Bipartite Allocations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(5), pages 4108-4130, May.
    11. Mengxin Wang & Heng Zhang & Paat Rusmevichientong & Max Shen, 2025. "Optimizing Offline Product Design and Online Assortment Policy: Measuring the Relative Impact of Each Decision," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(5), pages 4266-4286, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Julia Heger & Robert Klein, 2024. "Assortment optimization: a systematic literature review," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 46(4), pages 1099-1161, December.
    2. Kameng Nip & Zhenbo Wang & Zizhuo Wang, 2021. "Assortment Optimization under a Single Transition Choice Model," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(7), pages 2122-2142, July.
    3. Woonghee Tim Huh & Joseph Paat & Maurice Queyranne, 2026. "Performance of the Offer-Everything Policy," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 74(1), pages 141-160, January.
    4. Antoine Désir & Vineet Goyal & Danny Segev & Chun Ye, 2020. "Constrained Assortment Optimization Under the Markov Chain–based Choice Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(2), pages 698-721, February.
    5. Paat Rusmevichientong & Mika Sumida & Huseyin Topaloglu, 2020. "Dynamic Assortment Optimization for Reusable Products with Random Usage Durations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(7), pages 2820-2844, July.
    6. Ali Aouad & Jacob Feldman & Danny Segev, 2023. "The Exponomial Choice Model for Assortment Optimization: An Alternative to the MNL Model?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(5), pages 2814-2832, May.
    7. Ali Aouad & Daniela Saban, 2023. "Online Assortment Optimization for Two-Sided Matching Platforms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(4), pages 2069-2087, April.
    8. Ali Aouad & Danny Segev, 2023. "The Stability of MNL-Based Demand Under Dynamic Customer Substitution and Its Algorithmic Implications," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 71(4), pages 1216-1249, July.
    9. Strauss, Arne K. & Klein, Robert & Steinhardt, Claudius, 2018. "A review of choice-based revenue management: Theory and methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(2), pages 375-387.
    10. Xi Chen & Chao Shi & Yining Wang & Yuan Zhou, 2021. "Dynamic Assortment Planning Under Nested Logit Models," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(1), pages 85-102, January.
    11. Yicheng Bai & Omar El Housni & Paat Rusmevichientong & Huseyin Topaloglu, 2025. "Coordinated Inventory Stocking and Assortment Customization," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 73(6), pages 2953-2971, November.
    12. Shipra Agrawal & Vashist Avadhanula & Vineet Goyal & Assaf Zeevi, 2019. "MNL-Bandit: A Dynamic Learning Approach to Assortment Selection," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 1453-1485, September.
    13. Wang, Mengmeng & Zhang, Xun & Li, Xiaolong, 2023. "Multiple-purchase choice model: estimation and optimization," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    14. Jingwei Zhang & Will Ma & Huseyin Topaloglu, 2025. "Technical Note—Leveraging the Degree of Dynamic Substitution in Assortment and Inventory Planning," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 73(3), pages 1248-1259, May.
    15. Yicheng Bai & Jacob Feldman & Danny Segev & Huseyin Topaloglu & Laura Wagner, 2024. "Assortment Optimization Under the Multi-Purchase Multinomial Logit Choice Model," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 72(6), pages 2631-2664, November.
    16. Çömez-Dolgan, Nagihan & Fescioglu-Unver, Nilgun & Cephe, Ecem & Şen, Alper, 2021. "Capacitated strategic assortment planning under explicit demand substitution," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(3), pages 1120-1138.
    17. Guillermo Gallego & Gerardo Berbeglia, 2021. "The Limits of Personalization in Assortment Optimization," Papers 2109.14861, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2024.
    18. Antoine Désir & Vineet Goyal & Jiawei Zhang, 2022. "Technical Note—Capacitated Assortment Optimization: Hardness and Approximation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 70(2), pages 893-904, March.
    19. Mehrani, Saharnaz & Sefair, Jorge A., 2022. "Robust assortment optimization under sequential product unavailability," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(3), pages 1027-1043.
    20. Yufeng Cao & Paat Rusmevichientong & Huseyin Topaloglu, 2023. "Revenue Management Under a Mixture of Independent Demand and Multinomial Logit Models," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 71(2), pages 603-625, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:68:y:2022:i:7:p:4772-4785. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.