IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v23y2021i6p1398-1412.html

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as a Strategic Agent in the Pediatric Vaccine Market: An Analytical Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Kayla Cummings

    (Operations Research Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139)

  • Banafsheh Behzad

    (College of Business, California State University, Long Beach, Long Beach, California 90840)

  • Susan Martonosi

    (Department of Mathematics, Harvey Mudd College, Claremont, California 91711)

Abstract

Problem definition : Pediatric vaccine markets in the United States are vulnerable to the development of monopolies due to few manufacturers and high research and development costs. This work addresses how the government can ensure the cost-effective procurement of pediatric vaccines by all U.S. children from private manufacturers. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) significant patronage of pediatric vaccines affords them leverage in negotiating public-sector prices that prevent the formation of monopolies, but existing vaccine pricing literature excludes the CDC as a rational player. Academic/practical relevance : We combine optimization and game theoretic techniques to address cost-effective immunization of all U.S. children. Methodology : Our optimization model from the CDC’s perspective minimizes negotiated government costs while ensuring adequate national vaccination levels, linking dynamics in public and private sectors, and incorporating competitive manufacturer behavior. The optimization model embeds an extant game theoretic price model to capture competitive interactions among manufacturers in the private sector, where they compete independently of the CDC. The model is validated in an extended case study of the Infanrix–Daptacel vaccine duopoly. Results : The study indicates that dissimilar products advantageously segment markets with asymmetric manufacturers. Furthermore, markets are at lower risk when high-capacity manufacturers have moderate target profits, especially in cases of high demand and asymmetry. We demonstrate that our model can help restabilize a market that experiences a vaccine shortage and that the CDC might mitigate the same shortage using strategies that depend on which manufacturer is limited. We also underline scenarios in which the CDC may be able to prevent monopolies through financial incentives to manufacturers. The results support a paradigm shift from annual contracts to ongoing negotiations, which would enable the CDC to exercise control over high-risk markets. Managerial implications : Our study demonstrates an analytical approach for managerial government officials to influence pediatric vaccine prices via the procurement of public-sector goods.

Suggested Citation

  • Kayla Cummings & Banafsheh Behzad & Susan Martonosi, 2021. "Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as a Strategic Agent in the Pediatric Vaccine Market: An Analytical Approach," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(6), pages 1398-1412, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:23:y:2021:i:6:p:1398-1412
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2020.0902
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2020.0902
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2020.0902?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jean Tirole, 1988. "The Theory of Industrial Organization," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262200716, December.
    2. Robbins, Matthew J. & Lunday, Brian J., 2016. "A bilevel formulation of the pediatric vaccine pricing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(2), pages 634-645.
    3. Matthew Robbins & Sheldon Jacobson & Edward Sewell, 2010. "Pricing strategies for combination pediatric vaccines and their impact on revenue: Pediarix® or Pentacel®?," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 54-64, March.
    4. Brian Lunday & Matthew J. Robbins, 2016. "Informing pediatric vaccine procurement policy via the pediatric formulary design, pricing, and production problem," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(12), pages 1112-1126, December.
    5. Matthew J. Robbins & Sheldon H. Jacobson & Uday V. Shanbhag & Banafsheh Behzad, 2014. "The Weighted Set Covering Game: A Vaccine Pricing Model for Pediatric Immunization," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 183-198, February.
    6. Banafsheh Behzad & Sheldon H. Jacobson & Matthew J. Robbins, 2015. "A symmetric capacity-constrained differentiated oligopoly model for the United States pediatric vaccine market with linear demand," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(11), pages 1252-1266, November.
    7. Banafsheh Behzad & Sheldon H. Jacobson, 2016. "Asymmetric Bertrand-Edgeworth-Chamberlin Competition with Linear Demand: A Pediatric Vaccine Pricing Model," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(1), pages 71-84, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luyi Gui, 2026. "A Market-Based Mechanism for Global Vaccine Procurement Coalitions," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 100-116, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lunday, Brian J. & Robbins, Matthew J., 2019. "Collaboratively-developed vaccine pricing and stable profit sharing mechanisms," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 102-113.
    2. Maxime C. Cohen & Alexandre Jacquillat & Haotian Song, 2023. "Price Discrimination and Inventory Allocation in Bertrand Competition," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 148-167, January.
    3. Robbins, Matthew J. & Lunday, Brian J., 2016. "A bilevel formulation of the pediatric vaccine pricing problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(2), pages 634-645.
    4. Matthew J. Robbins & Sheldon H. Jacobson & Uday V. Shanbhag & Banafsheh Behzad, 2014. "The Weighted Set Covering Game: A Vaccine Pricing Model for Pediatric Immunization," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 183-198, February.
    5. Xu, Danni & Wang, Fan & Zhuo, Xiaopo & Liu, Yaoqi, 2024. "The performance of government subsidy schemes in a competitive vaccine market considering consumers' free-riding behavior," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    6. Duijzer, Lotty Evertje & van Jaarsveld, Willem & Dekker, Rommert, 2018. "Literature review: The vaccine supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(1), pages 174-192.
    7. Yang, Guang & Tian, Lin & Cai, Mei & Cao, Jie & Gong, Zaiwu, 2025. "Vertically probabilistic selling mechanism under asymmetric quality-tier competition: An analytical exploration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).
    8. E. Villemeur & Helmuth Cremer & Bernard Roy & Joëlle Toledano, 2007. "Worksharing, access and bypass: the structure of prices in the postal sector," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 67-85, August.
    9. Jianqiang Zhang & Weijun Zhong & Shue Mei, 2012. "Competitive effects of informative advertising in distribution channels," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 561-584, September.
    10. Donna, Javier D. & Pereira, Pedro & Trindade, Andre & Yoshida, Renan C., 2020. "Direct-to-Consumer Sales by Manufacturers and Bargaining," MPRA Paper 105773, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Francisco B. Galarza & Gabriella Wong, 2017. "The Impact of Price Information on Consumer Behavior: An Experiment," Working Papers 106, Peruvian Economic Association.
    12. Kaplow, Louis & Shapiro, Carl, 2007. "Antitrust," Handbook of Law and Economics, in: A. Mitchell Polinsky & Steven Shavell (ed.), Handbook of Law and Economics, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 15, pages 1073-1225, Elsevier.
    13. Kessing, Sebastian G. & Konrad, Kai A. & Kotsogiannis, Christos, 2006. "Federal tax autonomy and the limits of cooperation," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(2), pages 317-329, March.
    14. Etienne Billette de Villemeur & Kevin Guittet, 2004. "Optimal structure of air transport services when environnemental costs are taken into account," Post-Print hal-01022242, HAL.
    15. Aurora García‐Gallego & Nikolaos Georgantzís, 2009. "Market Effects of Changes in Consumers' Social Responsibility," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(1), pages 235-262, March.
    16. Simon P. Anderson & Régis Renault, 2011. "Price Discrimination," Chapters, in: André de Palma & Robin Lindsey & Emile Quinet & Roger Vickerman (ed.), A Handbook of Transport Economics, chapter 22, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    17. Leonard J. Mirman & Egas M. Salgueiro & Marc Santugini, 2013. "Integrating Real and Financial Decisions of the Firm," Cahiers de recherche 1333, CIRPEE.
    18. Kuosmanen, Natalia & Valmari, Nelli, 2023. "Renewal of Companies Through Product Switching," ETLA Working Papers 104, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    19. Alexander, Corinne E., 2002. "The Role Of Seed Company Supplied Information In Farmers' Decisions," 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA 19617, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    20. Kathryn E. Spier, 2003. "“Tied to the Mast”: Most-Favored-Nation Clauses in Settlement Contracts," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 32(1), pages 91-120, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:23:y:2021:i:6:p:1398-1412. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.