IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Loyalty Program Liabilities and Point Values


  • So Yeon Chun

    (INSEAD, 77305 Fontainebleau, France)

  • Dan A. Iancu

    (Graduate School of Business at Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305)

  • Nikolaos Trichakis

    (MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142)


Problem definition : Loyalty programs (LPs) introduce a new currency—the points—through which customers transact with firms. Such points represent a promise for future service, and their monetary value thus counts as a liability on the issuing firms’ balance sheets. Consequently, adjusting the value of points has a first-order effect on profitability and performance and emerges as a core operating decision. We study the problem of optimally setting the points’ value in view of their associated liabilities. Academic/practical relevance : Firms across numerous industries increasingly utilize LPs. The sheer magnitude of LPs coupled with recent changes in accounting rules have turned the associated liabilities into significant balance-sheet items, amounting to billions of dollars. Managers (from chief financial officers to chief marketing officers) struggle with the problem of adjusting the points’ value in view of these liabilities. Academic work is primarily aimed at understanding LPs as marketing tools, without studying the liability angle. Methodology : We develop a multiperiod model and use dynamic programming techniques and comparative statics analysis. Results : We show that the optimal policies depend on a new financial metric, given by the sum of the firm’s realized cash flows and outstanding deferred revenue, which we refer to as the profit potential . The total value of loyalty points is set to hit a particular target, which increases with the profit potential. We find that loyalty programs can act as buffers against uncertainty, with the value of points increasing (decreasing) under strong (weak) operating performance and increasing with uncertainty. Managerial implications : Setting the point values and adjusting operating decisions in view of LP liabilities should be done by tracking the firm’s profit potential. Loyalty programs can act as hedging tools against uncertainty in future operating performance, which provides a new rationale for their existence, even in the absence of competition.

Suggested Citation

  • So Yeon Chun & Dan A. Iancu & Nikolaos Trichakis, 2020. "Loyalty Program Liabilities and Point Values," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(2), pages 257-272, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:22:y:2020:i:2:p:257-272
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2018.0748

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL:
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Fudenberg, Drew & Tirole, Jean, 1995. "A Theory of Income and Dividend Smoothing Based on Incumbency Rents," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 103(1), pages 75-93, February.
    2. Mara Lederman, 2007. "Do enhancements to loyalty programs affect demand? The impact of international frequent flyer partnerships on domestic airline demand," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 38(4), pages 1134-1158, December.
    3. Dechow, Patricia M., 1994. "Accounting earnings and cash flows as measures of firm performance : The role of accounting accruals," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 3-42, July.
    4. Chunlei Tang, 2021. "Introduction," Springer Books, in: Data Capital, chapter 0, pages 1-32, Springer.
    5. Guoming Lai & Wenqiang Xiao & Jun Yang, 2012. "Supply Chain Performance Under Market Valuation: An Operational Approach to Restore Efficiency," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(10), pages 1933-1951, October.
    6. Anton Ovchinnikov & Béatrice Boulu-Reshef & Phillip E. Pfeifer, 2014. "Balancing Acquisition and Retention Spending for Firms with Limited Capacity," Post-Print hal-01261385, HAL.
    7. Aharon Ben‐Tal & Marc Teboulle, 2007. "An Old‐New Concept Of Convex Risk Measures: The Optimized Certainty Equivalent," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 17(3), pages 449-476, July.
    8. Teck H. Ho & Christopher S. Tang, 2004. "Introduction to the Special Issue on Marketing and Operations Management Interfaces and Coordination," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(4), pages 429-430, April.
    9. Nicholas C. Petruzzi & Maqbool Dada, 1999. "Pricing and the Newsvendor Problem: A Review with Extensions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(2), pages 183-194, April.
    10. Guoming Lai & Wenqiang Xiao, 2018. "Inventory Decisions and Signals of Demand Uncertainty to Investors," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 113-129, February.
    11. Dorotic, Matilda & Verhoef, Peter C. & Fok, Dennis & Bijmolt, Tammo H.A., 2014. "Reward redemption effects in a loyalty program when customers choose how much and when to redeem," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 339-355.
    12. Tang, Christopher S., 2010. "A review of marketing-operations interface models: From co-existence to coordination and collaboration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(1), pages 22-40, May.
    13. Roychowdhury, Sugata, 2006. "Earnings management through real activities manipulation," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 335-370, December.
    14. Anton Ovchinnikov & Béatrice Boulu-Reshef & Phillip E. Pfeifer, 2014. "Balancing Acquisition and Retention Spending for Firms with Limited Capacity," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(8), pages 2002-2019, August.
    15. Sam Aflaki & Ioana Popescu, 2014. "Managing Retention in Service Relationships," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(2), pages 415-433, February.
    16. Xin Chen & David Simchi-Levi, 2004. "Coordinating Inventory Control and Pricing Strategies with Random Demand and Fixed Ordering Cost: The Infinite Horizon Case," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 698-723, August.
    17. Guoming Lai & Laurens Debo & Lin Nan, 2011. "Channel Stuffing with Short-Term Interest in Market Value," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(2), pages 332-346, February.
    18. Smith, Clifford W. & Stulz, René M., 1985. "The Determinants of Firms' Hedging Policies," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(4), pages 391-405, December.
    19. Nathalie C. McCaughey & Christiaan Behrens, 2011. "Paying for Status? - The effect of frequent flier program member status on air fare choice," Monash Economics Working Papers 04-11, Monash University, Department of Economics.
    20. Xin Chen & David Simchi-Levi, 2004. "Coordinating Inventory Control and Pricing Strategies with Random Demand and Fixed Ordering Cost: The Finite Horizon Case," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(6), pages 887-896, December.
    21. DeFond, Mark L. & Park, Chul W., 1997. "Smoothing income in anticipation of future earnings," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 115-139, July.
    22. Byung-Do Kim & Mengze Shi & Kannan Srinivasan, 2004. "Managing Capacity Through Reward Programs," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(4), pages 503-520, April.
    23. Praveen K. Kopalle & Yacheng Sun & Scott A. Neslin & Baohong Sun & Vanitha Swaminathan, 2012. "The Joint Sales Impact of Frequency Reward and Customer Tier Components of Loyalty Programs," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 216-235, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Li, Chen & Swaminathan, Srinivasan & Kim, Junhee, 2021. "The role of marketing channels in consumers’ promotional point redemption decisions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 314-323.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. So Yeon Chun & Anton Ovchinnikov, 2019. "Strategic Consumers, Revenue Management, and the Design of Loyalty Programs," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(9), pages 3969-3987, September.
    2. Philipp Afèche & Mojtaba Araghi & Opher Baron, 2017. "Customer Acquisition, Retention, and Service Access Quality: Optimal Advertising, Capacity Level, and Capacity Allocation," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 674-691, October.
    3. Chen, Yanyan & Mandler, Timo & Meyer-Waarden, Lars, 2021. "Three decades of research on loyalty programs: A literature review and future research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 179-197.
    4. John M. Abowd & Felipe Balmaceda & David Kaplan., "undated". "Accounting Profits, Market Profits, and the Compensation of Regular Employees," ILADES-UAH Working Papers inv119, Universidad Alberto Hurtado/School of Economics and Business.
    5. Reza Maihami & Behrooz Karimi & Seyyed Mohammad Taghi Fatemi Ghomi, 2017. "Effect of two-echelon trade credit on pricing-inventory policy of non-instantaneous deteriorating products with probabilistic demand and deterioration functions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 257(1), pages 237-273, October.
    6. Anand Mohan Goel, 2003. "Why Do Firms Smooth Earnings?," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 76(1), pages 151-192, January.
    7. Silhan, Peter A., 2014. "Income smoothing from a Census X-12 perspective," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 106-115.
    8. Sharan Jagpal & Feihong Xia, 2019. "Coordinating Marketing and Production with Asymmetric Costs: Theory and Estimation," Customer Needs and Solutions, Springer;Institute for Sustainable Innovation and Growth (iSIG), vol. 6(1), pages 1-12, June.
    9. Ping-Sheng Koh, 2005. "Institutional Ownership and Income Smoothing: Australian Evidence," Accounting Research Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 18(2), pages 93-110, September.
    10. Spagnolo, Giancarlo, 1996. "Multimarket Contact, Concavity, and Collusion: on Extremal Equilibria of Interdependent Supergames," SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance 104, Stockholm School of Economics, revised 30 Nov 1998.
    11. Jian Hu & Junxuan Li & Sanjay Mehrotra, 2019. "A Data-Driven Functionally Robust Approach for Simultaneous Pricing and Order Quantity Decisions with Unknown Demand Function," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 1564-1585, November.
    12. Spagnolo, Giancarlo, 1999. "On Interdependent Supergames: Multimarket Contact, Concavity, and Collusion," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 127-139, November.
    13. Youhua (Frank) Chen & Ye Lu & Minghui Xu, 2012. "Optimal inventory control policy for periodic‐review inventory systems with inventory‐level‐dependent demand," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 59(6), pages 430-440, September.
    14. Boxiao Chen & Xiuli Chao & Hyun-Soo Ahn, 2019. "Coordinating Pricing and Inventory Replenishment with Nonparametric Demand Learning," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(4), pages 1035-1052, July.
    15. Francis de Véricourt & Miguel Sousa Lobo, 2009. "Resource and Revenue Management in Nonprofit Operations," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(5), pages 1114-1128, October.
    16. Xiong‐zhi Wang & Guo‐qing Wang, 2019. "Integrating dynamic pricing and inventory control for fresh‐agri product under consumer choice," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(1), pages 96-111, March.
    17. Shengzhong Huang & Chan Lyu & Xiaojun Lin, 2018. "Is Labor Related to the Duality of Earnings Smoothing?," Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, November.
    18. Wen Chen & Adam J. Fleischhacker & Michael N. Katehakis, 2015. "Dynamic pricing in a dual‐market environment," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 62(7), pages 531-549, October.
    19. Özelkan, Ertunga C. & Lim, Churlzu & Adnan, Ziaul Haq, 2018. "Conditions of reverse bullwhip effect in pricing under joint decision of replenishment and pricing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 207-223.
    20. Sirong Luo & Jianrong Wang, 2017. "A technical note on the dynamic nonstationary inventory-pricing control model with lost sale," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(19), pages 5816-5825, October.


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:22:y:2020:i:2:p:257-272. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: . General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Matthew Walls (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.