IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v45y1999i11p1524-1538.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Use of a Neural Factory to Investigate the Effect of Product Line Width on Manufacturing Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Paul M. Swamidass

    (Thomas Walter Center for Technology Management, Tiger Drive, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama 36849-5358)

  • Satish S. Nair

    (Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211)

  • Sanjay I. Mistry

    (John Deere Products Engineering Center, P.O. Box 8000, Waterloo, Iowa 50704)

Abstract

The dual goals of this study are: (1) to develop an empirically valid neural model of U.S. factories in a range of industries producing discrete products, and (2) to use the model to test the effect of changes in product line width on plant performance variables. Accordingly, a neural factory was developed using 59 input and 5 output/performance variables, and was trained using field data collected from 385 U.S. manufacturing plants. The model was validated using a holdout sample before conducting sensitivity tests. The study demonstrates that, through the use of parametric sensitivity analysis, the neural factory could be used to investigate the relationship between inputs and performance of a factory. While the focused factory principle would favor a smaller product line, economies of scope theory would favor a larger product line for the good of the factory; this implies a rather complex relationship between product line width (PLW) and plant performance. The neural factory was used to study the sensitivity of output/performance variables when product line width was varied over a range extending from 10% to 200% of the average values. The sensitivity analysis of the neural factory shows that, as the product line increases, it (1) does not affect cost-of-goods-sold (COGS), (2) decreases return on investment, (3) has a negative effect on the top management's perception of manufacturing performance, (4) increases inventory turns, and (5) increases sales per employee. The explanations for these findings show how complex and intertwined the relationships between PLW and performance variables are. They enhance our understanding of PLW and provide some new directions for future empirical research.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul M. Swamidass & Satish S. Nair & Sanjay I. Mistry, 1999. "The Use of a Neural Factory to Investigate the Effect of Product Line Width on Manufacturing Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(11), pages 1524-1538, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:45:y:1999:i:11:p:1524-1538
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.45.11.1524
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.45.11.1524
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.45.11.1524?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lee J. Krajewski & Barry E. King & Larry P. Ritzman & Danny S. Wong, 1987. "Kanban, MRP, and Shaping the Manufacturing Environment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 39-57, January.
    2. Sunder Kekre & Kannan Srinivasan, 1990. "Broader Product Line: A Necessity to Achieve Success?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(10), pages 1216-1232, October.
    3. Paul M. Swamidass & William T. Newell, 1987. "Manufacturing Strategy, Environmental Uncertainty and Performance: A Path Analytic Model," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 509-524, April.
    4. Kar Yan Tam & Melody Y. Kiang, 1992. "Managerial Applications of Neural Networks: The Case of Bank Failure Predictions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(7), pages 926-947, July.
    5. Baumol, William J & Braunstein, Yale M, 1977. "Empirical Study of Scale Economies and Production Complementarity: The Case of Journal Publication," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 85(5), pages 1037-1048, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yu-Shan Chen & Ke-Chiun Chang, 2009. "Using neural network to analyze the influence of the patent performance upon the market value of the US pharmaceutical companies," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 80(3), pages 637-655, September.
    2. Kai-Lung Hui, 2004. "Product Variety Under Brand Influence: An Empirical Investigation of Personal Computer Demand," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(5), pages 686-700, May.
    3. Lo, Chris K.Y. & Yeung, Andy C.L. & Edwin Cheng, T.C., 2011. "Meta-standards, financial performance and senior executive compensation in China: An institutional perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(1), pages 119-126, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hallgren, Mattias & Olhager, Jan, 2009. "Flexibility configurations: Empirical analysis of volume and product mix flexibility," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 746-756, August.
    2. Thomé, Antonio Márcio T. & Scavarda, Luiz Felipe & Pires, Sílvio R.I. & Ceryno, Paula & Klingebiel, Katja, 2014. "A multi-tier study on supply chain flexibility in the automotive industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 91-105.
    3. Soon-Yau Foong & Razak Idris, 2012. "Leverage, product diversity and performance of general insurers in Malaysia," Journal of Risk Finance, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 13(4), pages 347-361, August.
    4. Amoako-Gyampah, Kwasi & Acquaah, Moses, 2008. "Manufacturing strategy, competitive strategy and firm performance: An empirical study in a developing economy environment," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 575-592, February.
    5. Jonsson, Patrik, 2008. "Exploring problems related to the materials planning user environment," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 383-400, May.
    6. John A. Parnell, 2017. "Cronyism from the Perspective of the Firm: A Cross-National Assessment of Nonmarket Strategy," Journal of Private Enterprise, The Association of Private Enterprise Education, vol. 32(Fall 2017), pages 47-74.
    7. Palocsay, Susan W. & Stevens, Scott P. & Brookshire, Robert G. & Sacco, William J. & Copes, Wayne S. & Buckman, Robert F. & Smith, J. Stanley, 1996. "Using neural networks for trauma outcome evaluation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 93(2), pages 369-386, September.
    8. Zhou, Fanyin & Fu, Lijun & Li, Zhiyong & Xu, Jiawei, 2022. "The recurrence of financial distress: A survival analysis," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 1100-1115.
    9. Sanchez, Susan M. & Moeeni, Farhad & Sanchez, Paul J., 2006. "So many factors, so little time...Simulation experiments in the frequency domain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(1), pages 149-165, September.
    10. Yu-Shan Chen & Ke-Chiun Chang, 2009. "Using neural network to analyze the influence of the patent performance upon the market value of the US pharmaceutical companies," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 80(3), pages 637-655, September.
    11. Claudio Giachetti & Giovanni Battista Dagnino, 2014. "Detecting the relationship between competitive intensity and firm product line length: Evidence from the worldwide mobile phone industry," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(9), pages 1398-1409, September.
    12. Nan Xia & S. Rajagopalan, 2009. "Standard vs. Custom Products: Variety, Lead Time, and Price Competition," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(5), pages 887-900, 09-10.
    13. Beynon, Malcolm J. & Peel, Michael J., 2001. "Variable precision rough set theory and data discretisation: an application to corporate failure prediction," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 29(6), pages 561-576, December.
    14. Haider A. Khan, 2004. "General Conclusions: From Crisis to a Global Political Economy of Freedom," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Global Markets and Financial Crises in Asia, chapter 9, pages 193-211, Palgrave Macmillan.
    15. Peter Cappelli, 1995. "Rethinking Employment," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 33(4), pages 563-602, December.
    16. Sampath Rajagopalan, 2013. "Impact of Variety and Distribution System Characteristics on Inventory Levels at U.S. Retailers," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 15(2), pages 191-204, May.
    17. Arthur Charpentier & Emmanuel Flachaire & Antoine Ly, 2017. "Econom\'etrie et Machine Learning," Papers 1708.06992, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2018.
    18. Zhang, Qingyu & Vonderembse, Mark A. & Cao, Mei, 2009. "Product concept and prototype flexibility in manufacturing: Implications for customer satisfaction," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 194(1), pages 143-154, April.
    19. Kattan, MW & Cooper, RB, 1998. "The predictive accuracy of computer-based classification decision techniques.A review and research directions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 467-482, August.
    20. Maria H. Kim & Graham Partington, 2015. "Dynamic forecasts of financial distress of Australian firms," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 40(1), pages 135-160, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:45:y:1999:i:11:p:1524-1538. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.