IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormksc/v45y2026i4p699-715.html

Frontiers: ChatGPT Referrals to E-Commerce Websites: How Do LLMs Compare Against Traditional Channels?

Author

Listed:
  • Maximilian Kaiser

    (University of Hamburg, 20148 Hamburg, Germany; and Grips Intelligence, 10119 Berlin, Germany)

  • Christian Schulze

    (Frankfurt School of Finance & Management, 60322 Frankfurt am Main, Germany)

Abstract

We investigate organic large language model traffic (oLLM) versus traditional digital channels in e-commerce. Analyzing 12 months of first-party data from 973 websites with $20 billion combined revenue, we examine more than 50,000 transactions from ChatGPT referrals alongside 164 million transactions from traditional channels. Using regression models that account for data sparsity, we assess financial metrics (conversion rate, average order value, revenue per session) and engagement metrics (bounce rate, session duration, page views). Results are consistent across extensive robustness checks. One year after launch, oLLM exhibits conversion rates and revenue per session above paid social but below all other traditional channels. Product complexity moderates the effects: oLLM’s financial outcomes and traffic shares are stronger in complex product categories. Engagement metrics show favorable bounce rates but lower session duration and page views. Temporal analysis shows increasing conversion rates but declining average order values, yielding only moderate revenue-per-session gains over time. Cross-website analyses support growing consumer LLM proficiency as the underlying mechanism. The descriptive study positions oLLM as a new and developing channel. With low volumes and modest revenue per session, oLLM currently serves niche informational needs of proficient consumers and does not yet function as a broad conversion channel.

Suggested Citation

  • Maximilian Kaiser & Christian Schulze, 2026. "Frontiers: ChatGPT Referrals to E-Commerce Websites: How Do LLMs Compare Against Traditional Channels?," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(4), pages 699-715, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:45:y:2026:i:4:p:699-715
    DOI: 10.1287/mksc.2025.0489
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2025.0489
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mksc.2025.0489?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Garrett A. Johnson & Scott K. Shriver & Shaoyin Du, 2020. "Consumer Privacy Choice in Online Advertising: Who Opts Out and at What Cost to Industry?," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(1), pages 33-51, January.
    2. Ron Berman, 2018. "Beyond the Last Touch: Attribution in Online Advertising," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(5), pages 771-792, September.
    3. Ming-Hui Huang & Roland T Rust, 2025. "The GenAI Future of Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 52(1), pages 4-17.
    4. Michael Dinerstein & Liran Einav & Jonathan Levin & Neel Sundaresan, 2018. "Consumer Price Search and Platform Design in Internet Commerce," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 108(7), pages 1820-1859, July.
    5. Xueming Luo & Siliang Tong & Zheng Fang & Zhe Qu, 2019. "Frontiers: Machines vs. Humans: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Disclosure on Customer Purchases," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(6), pages 937-947, November.
    6. Alexander Bleier & Maik Eisenbeiss, 2015. "Personalized Online Advertising Effectiveness: The Interplay of What, When, and Where," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(5), pages 669-688, September.
    7. de Haan, Evert & Wiesel, Thorsten & Pauwels, Koen, 2016. "The effectiveness of different forms of online advertising for purchase conversion in a multiple-channel attribution framework," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 491-507.
    8. Jeremy Yang & Noah Yonack & Kate Zyskowski & Denis Yarats & Johnny Ho & Jerry Ma, 2025. "The Adoption and Usage of AI Agents: Early Evidence from Perplexity," Papers 2512.07828, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2025.
    9. John G. Lynch , Jr. & Dan Ariely, 2000. "Wine Online: Search Costs Affect Competition on Price, Quality, and Distribution," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 83-103, April.
    10. Glenn Ellison & Sara Fisher Ellison, 2009. "Search, Obfuscation, and Price Elasticities on the Internet," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 77(2), pages 427-452, March.
    11. Aaron Chatterji & Thomas Cunningham & David J. Deming & Zoe Hitzig & Christopher Ong & Carl Yan Shan & Kevin Wadman, 2025. "How People Use ChatGPT," NBER Working Papers 34255, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Miller, Klaus M. & Skiera, Bernd, 2024. "Economic consequences of online tracking restrictions: Evidence from cookies," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 241-264.
    13. Anindya Ghose & Sha Yang, 2009. "An Empirical Analysis of Search Engine Advertising: Sponsored Search in Electronic Markets," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(10), pages 1605-1622, October.
    14. Martin Reisenbichler & Thomas Reutterer & David A. Schweidel & Daniel Dan, 2022. "Frontiers: Supporting Content Marketing with Natural Language Generation," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(3), pages 441-452, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qiaoni Shi & Kai Zhu & Kai Gu, 2026. "Answering Without Referring: How AI Search Rewrites the Web's Economic Bargain," Papers 2607.07652, arXiv.org.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tianshu Sun & Zhe Yuan & Chunxiao Li & Kaifu Zhang & Jun Xu, 2024. "The Value of Personal Data in Internet Commerce: A High-Stakes Field Experiment on Data Regulation Policy," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(4), pages 2645-2660, April.
    2. Anuj Kapoor & Madhav Kumar, 2025. "Frontiers: Generative AI and Personalized Video Advertisements," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(4), pages 733-747, July.
    3. Anindya Ghose & Avi Goldfarb & Sang Pil Han, 2013. "How Is the Mobile Internet Different? Search Costs and Local Activities," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 613-631, September.
    4. Bayer, Emanuel & Srinivasan, Shuba & Riedl, Edward J. & Skiera, Bernd, 2020. "The impact of online display advertising and paid search advertising relative to offline advertising on firm performance and firm value," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 789-804.
    5. Wei Zhou & Zidong Wang, 2020. "Competing for Search Traffic in Query Markets: Entry Strategy, Platform Design, and Entrepreneurship," Working Papers 20-12, NET Institute.
    6. Hana Choi & Carl F. Mela & Santiago R. Balseiro & Adam Leary, 2020. "Online Display Advertising Markets: A Literature Review and Future Directions," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 31(2), pages 556-575, June.
    7. Zhang, Weiyi & Wang, Yong, 2025. "The impact of different recommendation algorithms on consumer search behavior and merchants competition," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    8. Avi Goldfarb, 2014. "What is Different About Online Advertising?," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 44(2), pages 115-129, March.
    9. Francesco Cerigioni & Simone Galperti, 2021. "Listing specs: The effect of framing attributes on choice," Economics Working Papers 1775, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    10. Nadine Schröder & Carsten D. Schultz & Friederike Paetz & Alicja Grzadziel & Melanie Clegg, 2025. "Unraveling the Influence: Exploring the Role of User Generated Content Along the Customer Journey and Understanding Its Relevance for Research and Practice," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 77(3), pages 457-496, September.
    11. Jun Tao & Qian Chen & James W. Snyder & Arava Sai Kumar & Amirhossein Meisami & Lingzhou Xue, 2025. "A Graphical Point Process Framework for Understanding Removal Effects in Multi-Touch Attribution," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(9), pages 7312-7332, September.
    12. Miller, Klaus M. & Skiera, Bernd, 2024. "Economic consequences of online tracking restrictions: Evidence from cookies," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 241-264.
    13. Gao, Fujuan & Fenoaltea, Enrico Maria & Zhang, Yi-Cheng, 2023. "Market failure in a new model of platform design with partially informed consumers," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 619(C).
    14. Qu, Chuang & Liu, Hanzhen & Wang, Sai, 2025. "Is ranking position equal to pricing power?—Evidence from Chinese e-commerce platforms," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    15. Franz Hackl & Michael Hölzl‐Leitner & Rudolf Winter‐Ebmer & Christine Zulehner, 2021. "Successful retailer strategies in price comparison platforms," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(5), pages 1284-1305, July.
    16. Michael R. Baye & John Morgan, 2005. "Red Queen Pricing Effects in E-Retail Markets," Working Papers 2005-07, Indiana University, Kelley School of Business, Department of Business Economics and Public Policy.
    17. Brüns, Jasper David & Meißner, Martin, 2024. "Do you create your content yourself? Using generative artificial intelligence for social media content creation diminishes perceived brand authenticity," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    18. Casner, Ben, 2020. "Seller curation in platforms," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    19. Mengzhou Zhuang & Eric (Er) Fang & Jongkuk Lee & Xiaoling Li, 2021. "The Effects of Price Rank on Clicks and Conversions in Product List Advertising on Online Retail Platforms," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 1412-1430, December.
    20. Garrett Johnson & Julian Runge & Eric Seufert, 2022. "Privacy-Centric Digital Advertising: Implications for Research," Customer Needs and Solutions, Springer;Institute for Sustainable Innovation and Growth (iSIG), vol. 9(1), pages 49-54, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:45:y:2026:i:4:p:699-715. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.