IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormksc/v42y2023i3p614-633.html

Overage Charge or Loyalty Discount: When Should Extra Consumptions Be Penalized or Rewarded?

Author

Listed:
  • Liang Guo

    (CUHK Business School, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, China)

Abstract

It is prevalent in many markets that customers are provided menus of tariffs with usage-dependent marginal prices. One instance of such a nonlinear pricing scheme is additional payments on excess consumptions (e.g., overage charge, late fee, and add-on charge for ancillary features or services). Conversely, firms may offer loyalty credit for repeated purchases or consumptions (e.g., quantity discount contracts and redemption points or mileage in reward programs). Interestingly, both increasing and diminishing marginal prices may exist across and within markets but not concurrently on a menu. In this paper, we present a new perspective on whether and when firms should penalize or reward extra consumptions. We consider the standard problem of how a monopoly firm may design a menu of tariffs to sequentially screen consumers with multiple-period consumptions who are heterogenous in consumption value distribution and demand frequency. To relinquish less information rent to the high-type consumers, the optimal design should involve a tariff with increasing (diminishing) marginal price when the demand frequency of the high-value consumers is above or sufficiently lower (slightly lower) than that of the low-value consumers. This general pattern continues to hold under alternative settings on consumer heterogeneity and on uncertainty resolution about multiple-unit demand.

Suggested Citation

  • Liang Guo, 2023. "Overage Charge or Loyalty Discount: When Should Extra Consumptions Be Penalized or Rewarded?," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(3), pages 614-633, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:42:y:2023:i:3:p:614-633
    DOI: 10.1287/mksc.2022.1391
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2022.1391
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mksc.2022.1391?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Byung-Do Kim & Mengze Shi & Kannan Srinivasan, 2001. "Reward Programs and Tacit Collusion," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(2), pages 99-120, June.
    2. Eric Maskin & John Riley, 1984. "Monopoly with Incomplete Information," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 15(2), pages 171-196, Summer.
    3. Jacques Cremer, 1984. "On the Economics of Repeat Buying," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 15(3), pages 396-403, Autumn.
    4. Michael D. Grubb, 2015. "Consumer Inattention and Bill-Shock Regulation," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 82(1), pages 219-257.
    5. Jiwoong Shin & K. Sudhir, 2010. "A Customer Management Dilemma: When Is It Profitable to Reward One's Own Customers?," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(4), pages 671-689, 07-08.
    6. K. Sridhar Moorthy, 1984. "Market Segmentation, Self-Selection, and Product Line Design," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(4), pages 288-307.
    7. Michael D. Grubb, 2009. "Selling to Overconfident Consumers," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 99(5), pages 1770-1807, December.
    8. Gadi Fibich & Roy Klein & Oded Koenigsberg & Eitan Muller, 2017. "Optimal Three-Part Tariff Plans," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(5), pages 1177-1189, October.
    9. Mussa, Michael & Rosen, Sherwin, 1978. "Monopoly and product quality," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 301-317, August.
    10. Anja Lambrecht & Katja Seim & Bernd Skiera, 2007. "Does Uncertainty Matter? Consumer Behavior Under Three-Part Tariffs," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(5), pages 698-710, 09-10.
    11. Byung-Do Kim & Mengze Shi & Kannan Srinivasan, 2004. "Managing Capacity Through Reward Programs," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(4), pages 503-520, April.
    12. Pascal Courty & Li Hao, 2000. "Sequential Screening," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 67(4), pages 697-717.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qi Zhang & Guohao Li & Zhengyu Bai & Xuanzhi Yang, 2026. "Membership‐Based Price Welfare Strategies in Retail Platforms: Coupons Versus Discounts," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 47(3), pages 779-802, April.
    2. Ying Bao & Peter Landry & Mengze Shi, 2025. "Forgetful Consumers and Consumption Tracking," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(3), pages 2311-2331, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hui Xiong & Ying-Ju Chen, 2013. "Product Line Design with Deliberation Costs: A Two-Stage Process," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 10(3), pages 225-244, September.
    2. Preyas S. Desai & Devavrat Purohit & Bo Zhou, 2018. "Allowing Consumers to Bundle Themselves: The Profitability of Family Plans," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(6), pages 953-969, November.
    3. Carbajal, Juan Carlos & Ely, Jeffrey C., 2016. "A model of price discrimination under loss aversion and state-contingent reference points," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 11(2), May.
    4. Phuong Ho, 2023. "Nonlinear pricing, biased consumers, and regulatory policy," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 138(2), pages 149-164, March.
    5. Chen, Jiawei & Jiang, Lai & Syed Shah, Saad Andalib, 2022. "An empirical model of the effects of “bill shock” regulation in mobile telecommunication markets," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    6. Jaesoo Kim & Dongsoo Shin, 2016. "Price Discrimination with Demarketing," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(4), pages 773-807, December.
    7. Bing Jing, 2017. "Behavior-Based Pricing, Production Efficiency, and Quality Differentiation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(7), pages 2365-2376, July.
    8. Bang, Se Hoon & Kim, Jaesoo, 2013. "Price discrimination via information provision," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 215-224.
    9. Herweg, Fabian, 2010. "Uncertain Demand, Consumer Loss Aversion, and Flat-Rate Tariffs," Discussion Paper Series of SFB/TR 15 Governance and the Efficiency of Economic Systems 330, Free University of Berlin, Humboldt University of Berlin, University of Bonn, University of Mannheim, University of Munich.
    10. Gadi Fibich & Roy Klein & Oded Koenigsberg & Eitan Muller, 2017. "Optimal Three-Part Tariff Plans," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(5), pages 1177-1189, October.
    11. Buqu Gao & Liang Guo, 2025. "Optimal Contracts for Time-Inconsistent Consumers with Heterogeneous Beliefs," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(1), pages 861-878, January.
    12. Kopalle, Praveen K. & Pauwels, Koen & Akella, Laxminarayana Yashaswy & Gangwar, Manish, 2023. "Dynamic pricing: Definition, implications for managers, and future research directions," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 99(4), pages 580-593.
    13. Liang Guo, 2025. "Selling Data to Marketers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(10), pages 8823-8841, October.
    14. Pietro Dall'Ara & Elia Sartori, 2026. "Screening in digital monopolies," Papers 2602.13014, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2026.
    15. Soheil Ghili & K. Sudhir & Nitish Jain & Ankur Garg, 2025. "Second-degree Price Discrimination: Theoretical Analysis, Experiment Design, and Empirical Estimation," Papers 2507.13426, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2025.
    16. Haowen Deng & Yifan Dou & Zenan Wu & Cheng Zhang, 2025. "Player-vs.-Player Game Design and Pricing: A Tournament Design Perspective," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 36(3), pages 1461-1477, September.
    17. Bose, Subir, 2014. "Monopolistic screening and uninformed buyers," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 348-353.
    18. Hui Xiong & Ying-Ju Chen, 2014. "Product Line Design with Seller-Induced Learning," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(3), pages 784-795, March.
    19. Inderst, Roman & Peitz, Martin, 2012. "Informing consumers about their own preferences," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 417-428.
    20. Mark Armstrong, 2016. "Nonlinear Pricing," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 8(1), pages 583-614, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:42:y:2023:i:3:p:614-633. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.