IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijefaa/v12y2020i1p43.html

Corporate Governance Features and Efficiency: Evidence from the Saudi Arabian Banks

Author

Listed:
  • Adel Bogari

Abstract

The aim of this article is to examine the effect of the Corporate Governance features as measured by the Independence of the board of directors, the board size and the ownership structure (private ownership/State ownership and foreign ownership) on the banking efficiency of Saudi Arabian banks. A data set of the twelve biggest banks for the period 2000 to 2017 is used. As for banking efficiency scores, the methodology is based on the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). It allows for Technical Efficiency, Pure Technical Efficiency and Scale Efficiency scores. The results of this study point to the significant role of The Independence (INDEP) variable supported by a positive and significant effect on efficiency in all regressions, indicating a positive relationship with the Technical Efficiency (TE) and the Pure Technical Efficiency (PTE). In the contrary, the independence of the board directors has a negative and significant effect on scale efficiency (SE). According to Board Size variable, results related to this later reveal a negative and a significant effect on technical efficiency (TE), Pure Technical Efficiency (PTE) and Scale Efficiency (SE) in all regressions. Finally, as for the ownership structure variables, results confirm that Private Ownership (OWEN-P) provides positive and significant effects on both the Technical and the Scale Efficiency. This effect seems to be turn to be negative and significant when it is correlated to the Pure Technical Efficiency. State Ownership (OWEN-S) impacts positively and significantly the Technical Efficiency, the Pure Technical Efficiency and Scale Efficiency separately. As for the Foreign Ownership (OWEN-F) variable, except for the Pure Technical Efficiency (PTE), we note a positive and significant effect on the Technical and Scale Efficiency. This study implies better Corporate Governance practices should be supported to improve the overall efficiency and its components. This includes in particular, the Board Size and the Ownership structure variables.

Suggested Citation

  • Adel Bogari, 2020. "Corporate Governance Features and Efficiency: Evidence from the Saudi Arabian Banks," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(1), pages 1-43, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijefaa:v:12:y:2020:i:1:p:43
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijef/article/download/0/0/41628/43190
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijef/article/view/0/41628
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ling Zhang & Sheng Zhang & Na Tao, 2016. "Financial System Risk Tolerance Capacity and Economic Growth: Evidence from a Cross-country Analysis," Global Economic Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(2), pages 97-115, June.
    2. Adams, Renée B. & Mehran, Hamid, 2012. "Bank board structure and performance: Evidence for large bank holding companies," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 243-267.
    3. Pillai, Rekha & Al-Malkawi, Husam-Aldin Nizar, 2018. "On the relationship between corporate governance and firm performance: Evidence from GCC countries," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 394-410.
    4. Yermack, David, 1996. "Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 185-211, February.
    5. Arun Upadhyay & Ram Sriram, 2011. "Board Size, Corporate Information Environment and Cost of Capital," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(9-10), pages 1238-1261, November.
    6. Diallo, Boubacar, 2018. "Bank efficiency and industry growth during financial crises," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 11-22.
    7. R. D. Banker & A. Charnes & W. W. Cooper, 1984. "Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(9), pages 1078-1092, September.
    8. Hadri Kusuma & Ariza Ayumardani, 2016. "The Corporate Governance Efficiency And Islamic Bank Performance : An Indonesian Evidence," Polish Journal of Management Studies, Czestochowa Technical University, Department of Management, vol. 13(1), pages 111-120, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hamzeh F. Assous, 2022. "Prediction of Banks Efficiency Using Feature Selection Method: Comparison between Selected Machine Learning Models," Complexity, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2022(1).
    2. Ma, Yunbiao & Shao, Jingcong & Shi, Beibei, 2025. "How air pollution influences corporate credit spreads: A pre-registered report," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adeabah, David & Gyeke-Dako, Agyapomaa & Andoh, Charles, 2018. "Board gender diversity, corporate governance and bank efficiency in Ghana: a two-stage data envelope analysis (DEA) approach," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 19(2), pages 299-320.
    2. Lina Novickytė & Jolanta Droždz, 2018. "Measuring the Efficiency in the Lithuanian Banking Sector: The DEA Application," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-15, March.
    3. Salim, Ruhul & Arjomandi, Amir & Seufert, Juergen Heinz, 2016. "Does corporate governance affect Australian banks' performance?," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 113-125.
    4. Addo, Kwabena Aboah & Hussain, Nazim & Iqbal, Jamshed, 2021. "Corporate Governance and Banking Systemic Risk: A Test of the Bundling Hypothesis," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    5. Jayati Sarkar & Subrata Sarkar, 2018. "Bank Ownership, Board Characteristics and Performance: Evidence from Commercial Banks in India," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-30, February.
    6. Ameni Tarchouna & Bilel Jarraya & Abdelfettah Bouri, 2022. "Do board characteristics and ownership structure matter for bank non-performing loans? Empirical evidence from US commercial banks," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 26(2), pages 479-518, June.
    7. Chunmei Liang & Ming-Hsiang Chen & Di Zhu & Hung Wan Kot & Zhandong Yang, 2022. "Nonlinear effects of board characteristics on China’s hotel firm performance," Tourism Economics, , vol. 28(8), pages 1998-2020, December.
    8. Sakawa, Hideaki & Watanabel, Naoki, 2018. "Board structures and performance in the banking industry: Evidence from Japan," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 308-320.
    9. Süleyman KALE & Mehmet Hasan EKEN, 2022. "Bank Efficiency and Economic Growth in the OECD Countries," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(3), pages 46-66, October.
    10. Miroslav Mateev & Ahmad Sahyouni, 2026. "Corporate governance mechanisms in the banking industry: is there any interplay between ownership concentration and market competition?," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 30(1), pages 93-154, March.
    11. Patrick Van Damme & Mahinda Wijesiri & Michele Meoli, 2016. "Governance and Efficiency of Microfinance Institutions," South Asia Economic Journal, Institute of Policy Studies of Sri Lanka, vol. 17(2), pages 236-247, September.
    12. Li, Li & Song, Frank M., 2013. "Do bank regulations affect board independence? A cross-country analysis," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 2714-2732.
    13. Ahmed Bouteska, 2020. "Do Board Characteristics Affect Bank Performance? Evidence from the Eurozone," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(6), pages 535-548, October.
    14. Muhammad Farooq Shabbir & Hassan Danial Aslam & Elaine Yen Nee Oon & Aamir Amin, 2024. "Optimizing corporate governance: unraveling the interplay of board structure and firm efficiency," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 2396034-239, December.
    15. Elnahass, Marwa & Salama, Aly & Trinh, Vu Quang, 2022. "Firm valuations and board compensation: Evidence from alternative banking models," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    16. Unda, Luisa A. & Ranasinghe, Dinithi, 2021. "To pay or not pay: Board remuneration and insolvency risk in credit unions," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    17. Tarchouna, Ameni & Jarraya, Bilel & Bouri, Abdelfettah, 2017. "How to explain non-performing loans by many corporate governance variables simultaneously? A corporate governance index is built to US commercial banks," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 645-657.
    18. Carmelo Algeri & Luc Anselin & Antonio Fabio Forgione & Carlo Migliardo, 2022. "Spatial dependence in the technical efficiency of local banks," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 101(3), pages 685-716, June.
    19. El Mokdad Ghaithaa & Awdeh Ali, 2025. "Corporate Governance, Bank Stability and Risk-Taking: Differences Between Conventional and Islamic Banks," Review of Middle East Economics and Finance, De Gruyter, vol. 21(1), pages 1-41.
    20. Tasawar Nawaz & Roszaini Haniffa & Mohammad Hudaib, 2021. "On intellectual capital efficiency and shariah governance in Islamic banking business model," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(3), pages 3770-3787, July.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijefaa:v:12:y:2020:i:1:p:43. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.