IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ibrjnl/v9y2016i12p32-40.html

Long-term Dynamics of Employee Identification with an Organizational Unit

Author

Listed:
  • Kenji Matsuo

Abstract

This study presents the first framework for understanding the long-term dynamics of employee identification with an organizational unit. Similar research generally adopts cross-sectional quantitative methods that insufficiently explain the long-term dynamics of identification. Following studies that find stronger identification with lower-level groups than with an entire organization, we examine the case of a marine hull unit of a Japanese property-casualty insurer. We suggest that employees initially identify with the unit because of “occupational ability recognition” and “affective recognition”. We identify that these factors are necessary and sufficient conditions for identification with the unit. When they are absent, dis-identification occurs. If identification based on these factors is maintained, “value preferences” become dimensions of identification. Members prefer the unit values of interesting work, professional utility, and career attainment. When employees are dissatisfied with the unit’s values, ambivalent identification occurs. Ultimately, mature employees may express a “value proposition orientation”. They identify with the unit by consciously relating their value proposition and the unit.

Suggested Citation

  • Kenji Matsuo, 2016. "Long-term Dynamics of Employee Identification with an Organizational Unit," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(12), pages 32-40, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ibrjnl:v:9:y:2016:i:12:p:32-40
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ibr/article/view/63361/34423
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ibr/article/view/63361
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Olkkonen, Maria-Elena & Lipponen, Jukka, 2006. "Relationships between organizational justice, identification with organization and work unit, and group-related outcomes," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 100(2), pages 202-215, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Raymond Loi & Hang-Yue Ngo, 2010. "Mobility norms, risk aversion, and career satisfaction of Chinese employees," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 237-255, June.
    2. Yan Liu & Christopher Berry, 2013. "Identity, Moral, and Equity Perspectives on the Relationship Between Experienced Injustice and Time Theft," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 118(1), pages 73-83, November.
    3. CLAIRE A. SIMMERS & ADELA J. McMURRAY, 2019. "Organisational Justice And Managing Workplace Innovation: How Important Are Formal Procedures?," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(03), pages 1-21, April.
    4. Hang-yue Ngo & Raymond Loi & Sharon Foley & Xiaoming Zheng & Lingqing Zhang, 2013. "Perceptions of organizational context and job attitudes: The mediating effect of organizational identification," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 149-168, March.
    5. Ana Lisbona & Abel Las-Hayas & Francisco J. Palací & Miguel Bernabé & Francisco J. Morales & Alexander Haslam, 2020. "Team Efficiency in Organizations: A Group Perspective on Initiative," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-17, March.
    6. Mariam Farooq & Omer Farooq & Walid Cheffi, 2019. "How Do Employees Respond to the CSR Initiatives of their Organizations: Empirical Evidence from Developing Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-14, May.
    7. Andrey V. Sidorenkov & Eugene F. Borokhovski & Dmitry V. Vorontsov, 2023. "Associations of employees’ identification and citizenship behavior in organization: a systematic review and a meta-analysis," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(2), pages 695-729, June.
    8. Chun, Jinseok S. & Brockner, Joel & De Cremer, David, 2018. "How temporal and social comparisons in performance evaluation affect fairness perceptions," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 1-15.
    9. Long Lam & Raymond Loi & Carol Leong, 2013. "Reliance and disclosure: How supervisory justice affects trust in supervisor and extra-role performance," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 231-249, March.
    10. Giessner, S.R., 2011. "Is the Merger Necessary? The Interactive Effect of Perceived Necessity and Sense of Continuity on Post-Merger Identification," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2011-017-ORG, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    11. Rupp, Deborah E. & Shao, Ruodan & Jones, Kisha S. & Liao, Hui, 2014. "The utility of a multifoci approach to the study of organizational justice: A meta-analytic investigation into the consideration of normative rules, moral accountability, bandwidth-fidelity, and social exchange," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 123(2), pages 159-185.
    12. Mertins Vanessa & Albert Max, 2015. "Does Participation Increase Outcome Acceptance? Evidence from a Power-to-take Experiment," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 235(6), pages 584-607, December.
    13. Serhat Erat & Hakan Kitapçı & Kültigin Akçin, 2020. "Managerial Perception and Organizational Identity: A Comparative Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-16, March.
    14. Hilal BARAN & Ceren GİDERLER, 2017. "A Study on Determining the Influence of Organizational Identification on Organizational Justice and Organizational Silence," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 7(3), pages 242-258, March.
    15. Hongwei He & Weichun Zhu & Xiaoming Zheng, 2014. "Procedural Justice and Employee Engagement: Roles of Organizational Identification and Moral Identity Centrality," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 122(4), pages 681-695, July.
    16. Matherne, Curtis & Waterwall, Brian & Ring, J. Kirk & Credo, Keith, 2017. "Beyond organizational identification: The legitimization and robustness of family identification in the family firm," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 8(3), pages 170-184.
    17. Ambra Galeazzo & Andrea Furlan & Andrea Vinelli, 2017. "The organizational infrastructure of continuous improvement – an empirical analysis," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 33-46, June.
    18. Patel, Charmi & Budhwar, Pawan & Varma, Arup, 2012. "Overall justice, work group identification and work outcomes: Test of moderated mediation process," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 213-222.
    19. Lyngdoh, Teidorlang & Liu, Annie H. & Sridhar, Guda, 2018. "Applying positive psychology to selling behaviors: A moderated–mediation analysis integrating subjective well-being, coping and organizational identity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 142-153.
    20. Samuel Fernández-Salinero & Yolanda Navarro Abal & Gabriela Topa, 2019. "On the Relationship between Perceived Conflict and Interactional Justice Influenced by Job Satisfaction and Group Identity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-11, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ibrjnl:v:9:y:2016:i:12:p:32-40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.