IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/manrev/v73y2023i2d10.1007_s11301-022-00258-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Associations of employees’ identification and citizenship behavior in organization: a systematic review and a meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Andrey V. Sidorenkov

    (Southern Federal University)

  • Eugene F. Borokhovski

    (Concordia University)

  • Dmitry V. Vorontsov

    (Southern Federal University)

Abstract

The article provides an overview of the research on the association between identifications (ID) of employees and their organizational citizenship behavior (OCB), and reports findings of a meta-analysis of empirically observed correlations (k = 149) between the two. Our analyses distinguished among six ID levels (personal, interpersonal, micro-group, group, sub-organizational, and organizational) and five OCB types identified as directed toward: individual performance, other individuals, relationships, organizational (group) performance, and maintaining rules and regulations. In addition, we systematically collected, analyzed, and reported data on geography of research, field of organization’s activity, respondents’ demographic characteristics, methods of measuring ID and OCB. In particular, we found that organizational identification is more often considered as a correlate of OCB than group and interpersonal identifications are, the cases of correlation between either sub-organizational or micro-group identifications with the OCB measures are exceedingly rare, whereas no empirical investigation of the association between personal identification and OCB could be found. The overall weighted average effect size indicates moderate positive relationships between employees’ identifications and their citizenship behaviors. Subsequent analyses of moderator variables discovered various degrees of strength of association between ID and OCB, depending on their specific combinations, so that the same level of identification could have uneven correlations with different types of OCB and vice versa. The associations between identifications and OCB strongly depend on how the latter is assessed: trough employees’ self-reports, supervisors’ evaluation, or colleagues’ assessment. Our review also addresses gaps and limitations in the existing empirical literature and discusses directions for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrey V. Sidorenkov & Eugene F. Borokhovski & Dmitry V. Vorontsov, 2023. "Associations of employees’ identification and citizenship behavior in organization: a systematic review and a meta-analysis," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(2), pages 695-729, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:manrev:v:73:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s11301-022-00258-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s11301-022-00258-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11301-022-00258-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11301-022-00258-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eric Lamm & Jennifer Tosti-Kharas & Cynthia King, 2015. "Empowering Employee Sustainability: Perceived Organizational Support Toward the Environment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 128(1), pages 207-220, April.
    2. Sana Mumtaz & Chris Rowley, 2020. "The relationship between leader–member exchange and employee outcomes: review of past themes and future potential," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 70(1), pages 165-189, February.
    3. Jianhua Ge & Xuemei Su & Yan Zhou, 2010. "Organizational socialization, organizational identification and organizational citizenship behavior," Nankai Business Review International, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 1(2), pages 166-179, June.
    4. Olkkonen, Maria-Elena & Lipponen, Jukka, 2006. "Relationships between organizational justice, identification with organization and work unit, and group-related outcomes," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 100(2), pages 202-215, July.
    5. Jongseok Cha & Young Chang & Tae-Yeol Kim, 2014. "Person–Organization Fit on Prosocial Identity: Implications on Employee Outcomes," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 123(1), pages 57-69, August.
    6. Niklas Nolzen, 2018. "The concept of psychological capital: a comprehensive review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 68(3), pages 237-277, August.
    7. Jie Li & Qiaozhuan Liang & Zhenzhen Zhang & Xiao Wang, 2018. "Leader humility and constructive voice behavior in China: a dual process model," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 39(6), pages 840-854, September.
    8. Jianhua Ge & Xuemei Su & Yan Zhou, 2010. "Organizational socialization, organizational identification and organizational citizenship behavior," Nankai Business Review International, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 1(2), pages 166-179, June.
    9. Carnevale, Joel B. & Huang, Lei & Paterson, Ted, 2019. "LMX-differentiation strengthens the prosocial consequences of leader humility: An identification and social exchange perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 287-296.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lianying Zhang & Xiaocan Li & Ziqing Liu, 2022. "Fostering Constructive Deviance by Leader Moral Humility: The Mediating Role of Employee Moral Identity and Moderating Role of Normative Conflict," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(2), pages 731-746, October.
    2. Andrey V. Sidorenkov & Ekaterina S. Salnikova & Dmitry V. Vorontsov & Alexey A. Klimov, 2020. "Dimensions of Identification in the Workgroup and Employees’ Contributions to Collaborative Activities," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, November.
    3. Neelam Kaushal & Neeraj Kaushik & Brijesh Sivathanu, 2021. "Workplace ostracism in various organizations: a systematic review and bibliometric analysis," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(4), pages 783-818, October.
    4. Maria Järlström & Essi Saru & Sinikka Vanhala, 2018. "Sustainable Human Resource Management with Salience of Stakeholders: A Top Management Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(3), pages 703-724, October.
    5. Raymond Loi & Hang-Yue Ngo, 2010. "Mobility norms, risk aversion, and career satisfaction of Chinese employees," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 237-255, June.
    6. Bo Shao & Pablo Cardona & Isabel Ng & Raymond N. C. Trau, 2017. "Are prosocially motivated employees more committed to their organization? The roles of supervisors’ prosocial motivation and perceived corporate social responsibility," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 34(4), pages 951-974, December.
    7. Saskia Crucke & Marie Servaes & Tom Kluijtmans & Shana Mertens & Eveline Schollaert, 2022. "Linking environmentally‐specific transformational leadership and employees' green advocacy: The influence of leadership integrity," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(2), pages 406-420, March.
    8. Sana Mumtaz & Chris Rowley, 2020. "The relationship between leader–member exchange and employee outcomes: review of past themes and future potential," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 70(1), pages 165-189, February.
    9. Hang-yue Ngo & Raymond Loi & Sharon Foley & Xiaoming Zheng & Lingqing Zhang, 2013. "Perceptions of organizational context and job attitudes: The mediating effect of organizational identification," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 149-168, March.
    10. Małgorzata Okręglicka & Prabhat Mittal & Valentinas Navickas, 2023. "Exploring the Mechanisms Linking Perceived Organizational Support, Autonomy, Risk Taking, Competitive Aggressiveness and Corporate Sustainability: The Mediating Role of Innovativeness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-23, March.
    11. Ma Ying & Naveed Ahmad Faraz & Fawad Ahmed & Ali Raza, 2020. "How Does Servant Leadership Foster Employees’ Voluntary Green Behavior? A Sequential Mediation Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-21, March.
    12. Maria Luisa Giancaspro & Antonino Callea & Amelia Manuti, 2022. "“I Like It like That”: A Study on the Relationship between Psychological Capital, Work Engagement and Extra-Role Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    13. Ge Yan & Liang Meng & Bo Li & Jiamin Li, 2023. "How Can Managers Promote Employee Sustainability? A Study on the Impact of Servant Leadership on Emotional Labor," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-19, July.
    14. Ana Lisbona & Abel Las-Hayas & Francisco J. Palací & Miguel Bernabé & Francisco J. Morales & Alexander Haslam, 2020. "Team Efficiency in Organizations: A Group Perspective on Initiative," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-17, March.
    15. Annum Tariq Maan & Ghulam Abid & Tahira Hassan Butt & Fouzia Ashfaq & Saira Ahmed, 2020. "Perceived organizational support and job satisfaction: a moderated mediation model of proactive personality and psychological empowerment," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-12, December.
    16. Leonel Prieto & Muhammad Ruhul Amin & Arman Canatay, 2022. "Examining Social Sustainability in Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-43, September.
    17. Zhiyong Han & Qun Wang & Xiang Yan, 2019. "How Responsible Leadership Motivates Employees to Engage in Organizational Citizenship Behavior for the Environment: A Double-Mediation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-13, January.
    18. Chun, Jinseok S. & Brockner, Joel & De Cremer, David, 2018. "How temporal and social comparisons in performance evaluation affect fairness perceptions," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 1-15.
    19. Tahir Farid & Sadaf Iqbal & Jianhong Ma & Sandra Castro-González & Amira Khattak & Muhammad Khalil Khan, 2019. "Employees’ Perceptions of CSR, Work Engagement, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Mediating Effects of Organizational Justice," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-16, May.
    20. Pascal Paillé & Nicolas Raineri & Olivier Boiral, 2019. "Environmental Behavior On and Off the Job: A Configurational Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(1), pages 253-268, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:manrev:v:73:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s11301-022-00258-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.