IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ibrjnl/v11y2018i6p11-20.html

Intention to Purchase Chapters of Online Literature: A Pilot Study in Thailand

Author

Listed:
  • Duangkamol Chuengprapa
  • Nitaya Wongpinunwatana

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the factors that influence the intention to purchase chapters of online literature. This study is based on descriptive research using an online survey. The results indicate that six factors (favorable attitude from social norms, functional dependence on platform, emotional attachment to content creator, perceived benefit, perceived sacrifice, and perceived value) can be used to predict the intention to purchase online literature. The findings of this research will help practitioners by providing a guideline to improve products and services. This research combines the value intention model, status quo bias theory, and integration of attachment theory and socio-technical systems, and as far as the author knows, these theories have never before been studied together.

Suggested Citation

  • Duangkamol Chuengprapa & Nitaya Wongpinunwatana, 2018. "Intention to Purchase Chapters of Online Literature: A Pilot Study in Thailand," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(6), pages 11-20, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ibrjnl:v:11:y:2018:i:6:p:11-20
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ibr/article/view/75267/41518
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ibr/article/view/75267
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Namjoo Choi, 2013. "Information systems attachment: An empirical exploration of its antecedents and its impact on community participation intention," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 64(11), pages 2354-2365, November.
    2. Samuelson, William & Zeckhauser, Richard, 1988. "Status Quo Bias in Decision Making," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 7-59, March.
    3. Namjoo Choi, 2013. "Information systems attachment: An empirical exploration of its antecedents and its impact on community participation intention," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 64(11), pages 2354-2365, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, You & Li, Xiaolin & Cai, Jiali, 2021. "How attachment affects user stickiness on live streaming platforms: A socio-technical approach perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    2. Jianwen Yan & Siwei Zhang & Siqi Zhang, 2023. "Emotional Attachment in Social E-Commerce: The Role of Social Capital and Peer Influence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-14, March.
    3. Simon, Françoise, 2016. "Consumer adoption of No Junk Mail stickers: An extended planned behavior model assessing the respective role of store flyer attachment and perceived intrusiveness," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 12-21.
    4. Zhou, Tao & Zhang, Chunlei, 2024. "Examining generative AI user addiction from a C-A-C perspective," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    5. Philippe Fevrier & Sebastien Gay, 2005. "Informed Consent Versus Presumed Consent The Role of the Family in Organ Donations," HEW 0509007, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Turner, Robert & Willmarth, Blake, 2014. "Valuation of Cultural and Natural Resources in North Cascades National Park: Results from a Tournament-Style Contingent Choice Survey," Working Papers 2014-01, Department of Economics, Colgate University, revised 23 Jan 2014.
    7. Lisa A. Robinson & James K. Hammitt, 2011. "Behavioral Economics and Regulatory Analysis," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(9), pages 1408-1422, September.
    8. Wiebke Roß & Jens Weghake, 2018. "Wa(h)re Liebe: Was Online-Dating-Plattformen über zweiseitige Märkte lehren," TUC Working Papers in Economics 0017, Abteilung für Volkswirtschaftslehre, Technische Universität Clausthal (Department of Economics, Technical University Clausthal).
    9. Qi Nan Zhai, 2015. "Asset Pricing Under Ambiguity and Heterogeneity," PhD Thesis, Finance Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney, number 16, July-Dece.
    10. Ninko Kostovski & Marjan Bojadjiev & Hari Lokvenec, 2017. "Decision Support Systems For New Project Development In Fast Moving Consumer Goods Industries," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 5, pages 4-14, October.
    11. Bryce, Cormac & Dowling, Michael & Lucey, Brian, 2020. "The journal quality perception gap," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(5).
    12. Xingrong Hou & Jianmin Zeng & Hong Chen & Li Su, 2019. "The endowment effect in the genes: An exploratory study," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 14(3), pages 293-298, May.
    13. van Rooij, Maarten C.J. & Kool, Clemens J.M. & Prast, Henriette M., 2007. "Risk-return preferences in the pension domain: Are people able to choose?," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(3-4), pages 701-722, April.
    14. Aarushi Dhingra & Gianluca Fiorentini & Ayman Fouda & Naomi Moy, 2026. "Tough versus soft regulations to promote generic medications in Italy," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 27(2), pages 453-477, March.
    15. Jeffrey R. Brown & Nellie Liang & Scott Weisbenner, 2007. "Individual Account Investment Options and Portfolio Choice: Behavioral Lessons from 401(k) Plans," NBER Chapters, in: Public Policy and Retirement, Trans-Atlantic Public Economics Seminar (TAPES), pages 1992-2013, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Zachary Grossman, 2014. "Strategic Ignorance and the Robustness of Social Preferences," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(11), pages 2659-2665, November.
    17. Boyce, Christopher & Czajkowski, Mikołaj & Hanley, Nick, 2019. "Personality and economic choices," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 82-100.
    18. Paula Alejandra Algarra Saavedra3, 2023. "Escasez de órganos: impacto del uso de opciones predeterminadas para la donación en países en vía de desarrollo," Documentos de trabajo 20775, Escuela de Gobierno - Universidad de los Andes.
    19. Dynarski, Susan M. & Scott–Clayton, Judith E., 2006. "The Cost of Complexity in Federal Student Aid: Lessons From Optimal Tax Theory and Behavioral Economics," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 59(2), pages 319-356, June.
    20. Guy Barokas & Hila Hindy Ling & Arie Sherman & Tal Shavit, 2026. "Trapped in the Familiar: Longitudinal Influence of Status-Quo Bias on Emotional Well-being during War," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 1-27, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ibrjnl:v:11:y:2018:i:6:p:11-20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.