IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/gjhsjl/v11y2019i10p89.html

Why Did the Policy to Convert Hospitals Into Facilities Not Work in Japan?

Author

Listed:
  • Yuka Mine
  • Masayuki Yokoi
  • Takao Tashiro

Abstract

The government of Japan formulated measures to significantly reduce the number of hospital beds for long-term care in 2006. In particular, long-term care hospital beds covered by long-term care insurance (sanatorium medical facilities) were to be abolished in 2012, and existing sanatorium medical facilities were to be converted into long-term care insurance services such as geriatric health services facilities. However, the conversion did not progress in spite of various support measures, and the deadline for abolishment was extended. In order to clarify the reason for this, we selected 28 hospitals with 402 or more long-term care beds and 28 health services facilities with 158 or more beds and examined their management philosophies and analyzed the keywords included. The most popular keyword was “community” in both hospitals and facilities. Hospitals had a significantly higher rate of 60.7% (P< 0.05) of including “trust” or “feeling of relief” in their management philosophies. Facilities had higher rates of including any of the terms “return” or “independence” or “home” (32.1%, P= 0.051), and also of including either “service” or “care” (46.1%, P< 0.05). In conclusion, it is suggested that hospitals with long-term care beds differentiate themselves from neighboring facilities in that they are able to simply accept the situation and be responsible for terminal care whenever inpatients may have difficulty returning home. In addition, it seemed difficult for hospitals to convert into health service facilities, the aim of which is to enable residents to return home.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuka Mine & Masayuki Yokoi & Takao Tashiro, 2019. "Why Did the Policy to Convert Hospitals Into Facilities Not Work in Japan?," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(10), pages 1-89, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:11:y:2019:i:10:p:89
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/gjhs/article/download/0/0/40421/41612
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/gjhs/article/view/0/40421
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Office of Health Economics, 2007. "The Economics of Health Care," For School 001490, Office of Health Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dolan, Paul & Metcalf, Robert, 2008. "Comparing willingness-to-pay and subjective well-being in the context of non-market goods," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 28504, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Petrolia, Daniel & Interis, Matthew & Hwang, Joonghyun, 2015. "Single-Choice, Repeated-Choice, and Best-Worst Elicitation Formats: Do Results Differ and by How Much?," Working Papers 212479, Mississippi State University, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    3. Christian Lorenz, 2012. "Triangulating health expenditure estimates from different data sources in developing countries," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, January.
    4. Christopher C. Afendulis & Michael E. Chernew & Daniel P. Kessler, 2013. "The Effect of Medicare Advantage on Hospital Admissions and Mortality," NBER Working Papers 19101, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. James F. Burgess & Matthew L. Maciejewski & Chris L. Bryson & Michael Chapko & John C. Fortney & Mark Perkins & Nancy D. Sharp & Chuan‐Fen Liu, 2011. "Importance of health system context for evaluating utilization patterns across systems," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(2), pages 239-251, February.
    6. McDonald, Rebecca & Powdthavee, Nattavudh, 2018. "The Shadow Prices of Voluntary Caregiving: Using Panel Data of Well-Being to Estimate the Cost of Informal Care," IZA Discussion Papers 11545, IZA Network @ LISER.
    7. Normann Lorenz, 2014. "Using quantile regression for optimal risk adjustment," Research Papers in Economics 2014-11, University of Trier, Department of Economics.
    8. Hristov, Hristov & Kuhar, Ales, 2013. "Young Urban Adults' Preferences for Wine Attributes: An Exploratory Study of the Republic of Macedonia Wine Market Applying the Best-Worst Scaling," 2013 Conference: Tools for decision support in agriculture and rural development, April 18-19, 2013, Krško, Slovenia 183907, Slovenian Association of Agricultural Economists (DAES).
    9. Verónica Amarante & Marco Manacorda & Edward Miguel & Andrea Vigorito, 2016. "Do Cash Transfers Improve Birth Outcomes? Evidence from Matched Vital Statistics, Program, and Social Security Data," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 8(2), pages 1-43, May.
    10. Hope Corman & Dhaval Dave & Nancy E. Reichman, 2018. "Evolution of the Infant Health Production Function," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 85(1), pages 6-47, July.
    11. Trottmann, Maria & Zweifel, Peter & Beck, Konstantin, 2012. "Supply-side and demand-side cost sharing in deregulated social health insurance: Which is more effective?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 231-242.
    12. Cinzia Di Novi & Rowena Jacobs & Matteo Migheli, 2015. "The Quality of Life of Female Informal Caregivers: From Scandinavia to the Mediterranean Sea," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 31(3), pages 309-333, August.
    13. Colombier, Carsten & Weber, Werner, 2009. "Projecting health-care expenditure for Switzerland: further evidence against the 'red-herring' hypothesis," MPRA Paper 26747, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Nov 2009.
    14. V. Srinivasan & G. Shainesh & Anand K. Sharma, 2015. "An approach to prioritize customer-based, cost-effective service enhancements," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(14), pages 747-762, October.
    15. Marianne P. Bitler & Madeline Zavodny, 2014. "Medicaid: A Review of the Literature," NBER Working Papers 20169, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Seungchul Lee & Robert Rosenman, 2013. "Reimbursement and Investment: Prospective Payment and For-Profit Hospitals’ Market Share," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 503-518, December.
    17. Arjen Hussem & Casper Ewijk & Harry Rele & Albert Wong, 2016. "The Ability to Pay for Long-Term Care in the Netherlands: A Life-cycle Perspective," De Economist, Springer, vol. 164(2), pages 209-234, June.
    18. Deirdre Shaw & Robert McMaster & Terry Newholm, 2016. "Care and Commitment in Ethical Consumption: An Exploration of the ‘Attitude–Behaviour Gap’," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 136(2), pages 251-265, June.
    19. Cebula, Richard, 2007. "Small Firm Size and Health Insurance: A Private Enterprise Perspective," MPRA Paper 50939, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 10 Apr 2007.
    20. Murthy, Vasudeva N.R. & Okunade, Albert A., 2009. "The core determinants of health expenditure in the African context: Some econometric evidence for policy," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 57-62, June.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:11:y:2019:i:10:p:89. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.