IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aea/aejapp/v15y2023i3p341-79.html

What Difference Does a Health Plan Make? Evidence from Random Plan Assignment in Medicaid

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Geruso
  • Timothy J. Layton
  • Jacob Wallace

Abstract

Exploiting the random assignment of Medicaid beneficiaries to managed care plans, we find substantial plan-specific spending effects despite plans having identical cost sharing. Enrollment in the lowest-spending plan reduces spending by at least 25 percent—primarily through quantity reductions—relative to enrollment in the highest-spending plan. Rather than reducing "wasteful" spending, lower-spending plans broadly reduce medical service provision—including the provision of low-cost, high-value care—and worsen beneficiary satisfaction and health. Consumer demand follows spending: a 10 percent increase in plan-specific spending is associated with a 40 percent increase in market share. These facts have implications for the government's contracting problem and program cost growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Geruso & Timothy J. Layton & Jacob Wallace, 2023. "What Difference Does a Health Plan Make? Evidence from Random Plan Assignment in Medicaid," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 15(3), pages 341-379, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:aea:aejapp:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:341-79
    DOI: 10.1257/app.20210843
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/app.20210843
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/app.20210843.appx
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/app.20210843.ds
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1257/app.20210843?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Timothy Layton & Ellen J. Montz & Mark Shepard, 2017. "Health Plan Payment in U.S. Marketplaces: Regulated Competition with a Weak Mandate," NBER Working Papers 23444, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Lee, Ajin, 2025. "How does medicaid managed care affect provider behavior? New evidence from spillovers on private health care," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    3. Layton, Timothy J. & Politzer, Eran, 2025. "The dynamic fiscal costs of outsourcing health insurance - evidence from Medicaid," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    4. Politzer, Eran, 2025. "A change of plans: Switching costs in the procurement of health insurance," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    5. Benjamin R. Handel & Jonathan T. Kolstad, 2021. "The Affordable Care Act After a Decade: Industrial Organization of the Insurance Exchanges," NBER Working Papers 29178, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Calvin Ackley & Abe Dunn & Eli Liebman & Adam Hale Shapiro, 2025. "Are Medicaid and Medicare Patients Treated Equally?," Working Paper Series 2024-14, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.
    7. Amitabh Chandra & Evan Flack & Ziad Obermeyer, 2021. "The Health Costs of Cost-Sharing," NBER Working Papers 28439, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Desai, Sunita M. & Padmanabhan, Prianca & Chen, Alan Z. & Lewis, Ashley & Glied, Sherry A., 2023. "Hospital concentration and low-income populations: Evidence from New York State Medicaid," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    9. Timothy Layton & Alice K. Ndikumana & Mark Shepard, 2017. "Health Plan Payment in Medicaid Managed Care: A Hybrid Model of Regulated Competition," NBER Working Papers 23518, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • G22 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Insurance; Insurance Companies; Actuarial Studies
    • H51 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Government Expenditures and Health
    • I13 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health Insurance, Public and Private
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
    • I38 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - Government Programs; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aea:aejapp:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:341-79. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Michael P. Albert (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aeaaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.