IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/assjnl/v14y2018i4p18.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of Hope and Self-efficacy on Nurses’ Subjective Well-being

Author

Listed:
  • Ruiming Liu
  • Pan Zeng
  • Peng Quan

Abstract

Although subjective well-being is considered important for nurses, the relationship between hope, self-efficacy, and subjective well-being among nurses has rarely been assessed. This study purposes to explore the relationships between hope, self-efficacy, and subjective well-being. The analysis relies on data from 1757 female nurses in 3 hospitals in China. Nurses completed a demographic form, General Self-efficacy Scale, Hope Scale, General Well-Being Schedule. A mediate model of the hypothesized relationships between the constructs was tested. Significant direct relationships of hope, self-efficacy, and subjective well-being were displayed. Mediation analyses reveal that the impact of self-efficacy on subjective well-being is partially mediated by two components of hope, agency and pathways. Hope was shown to be a key mediator for the relationships between self-efficacy and subjective well-being. These findings advance current understandings on the hopeful thinking in nurses.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruiming Liu & Pan Zeng & Peng Quan, 2018. "The Role of Hope and Self-efficacy on Nurses’ Subjective Well-being," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:assjnl:v:14:y:2018:i:4:p:18
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ass/article/download/73170/40956
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ass/article/view/73170
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:assjnl:v:14:y:2018:i:4:p:18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.